Rowe v. DPI Specialty Foods et al
| Thomas Rowe |
| DPI Specialty Foods and Jami Floyd |
| 2:2013cv00708 |
| July 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| David Nuffer |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Libel,Assault,Slander |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
258
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 218 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 8/6/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
254
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 237 Motion to Review Clerks Taxation of Costs; granting 238 Motion to Review Clerks Taxation of Costs. An additional $3,246.87 is awarded to plaintiff and the total amount awarded for costs in this matter is $16,447.37. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 4/20/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
197
MEMORANDUM DECISION ORDER Defendants Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law is GRANTED in part as it relates to the fourth alleged defamatory statement and the punitive damages claim, and RESERVED in part as it relates to the remaining claims. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on August 29 2015. (DN)
|
|
Filing
171
MEMORANDUM DECISION andORDER CORRECTING 169 Order on Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on August 19 2015. (DN)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 6/3/15 (alt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
