Burke v. Sorensen
Petitioner: Ryan David Burke
Respondent: Dennis Sorensen
Case Number: 2:2013cv00952
Filed: October 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Sanpete
Presiding Judge: Tena Campbell
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER OF DISMISSAL: It is hereby ordered that Ryan Burke's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 8/27/2014. (kpf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burke v. Sorensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ryan David Burke
Represented By: Denver C. Snuffer, Jr.
Represented By: Steven R. Paul
Represented By: Tahnee L. Hamilton
Represented By: Daniel B. Garriott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dennis Sorensen
Represented By: Mark C. Field
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?