Xlear et al v. STS Health
Xlear and Jones Bozeman Family Limited Partnership |
STS Health |
2:2014cv00806 |
November 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Utah |
Brooke C. Wells |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dismissing 49 Counterclaim for failure to prosecute and entering Default against STS Health. By no later than 9/24/19, Plaintiff is to file a motion for default judgment and affidavit re claims that can be made certain by computation. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 9/12/19 (alt) |
Filing 86 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 64 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 4/15/19 (alt) |
Filing 85 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER re Claim Construction: The claims term "an effective amount" is to be construed as "An amount effective to clean the nasopharynx in a human." Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 4/4/19 (alt) |
Filing 82 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 63 Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order. STS is granted leave to file its Supplemental Final Unenforceability and Invalidity Contentions as attached to the Motion with one modification on or before April 27, 2017. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 4/20/2017. (jds) |
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 29 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 12/14/15 (alt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.