Baldwin v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Karen M. Baldwin
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 2:2015cv00079
Filed: February 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: Brooke C. Wells
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Case Closed.; granting 11 Motion to Dismiss. Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to case; adopting Report and Recommendations re 12 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, this case is dismissed. Each party shall bear their own costs. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 12/14/16. (jmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baldwin v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen M. Baldwin
Represented By: Joseph R. Goodman, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?