Barnes v. Norton et al
||Earl L. Barnes
||Shayne Norton, Alan Howard, Roger Peterson, Chad Duford, Sidney Roberts, Steven Turley and Billie Casper
||March 13, 2015
||US District Court for the District of Utah
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 29, 2018
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. Having dismissed Plaintiff's federal claims, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state-law claims of medical-malpractice, and so those are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 03/29/2018. (kpf) Modified on 3/29/2018: corrected text (alt)
|March 29, 2017
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER: It is hereby ordered that: If the State is unable to accept service of process for the dfts identified above, the State shall disclose to the US Marshals Service any information in its records that may hel p in identifying, locating andcompleting service of process upon the named defendants. Such information shall include, but isnot limited to, the defendants' full names and any known aliases, dates of birth, Social Securitynumbers, driver's license numbers, all previous addresses, and last known addresses on file. TheU.S. Marshal shall take all necessary measures to safeguard any personal information providedby the State to ensure that it is not disclosed to anyone other than the U.S. Marshals Service. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 03/29/2017. (kpf)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?