First American Title Insurance et al v. Northwest Title Insurance Agency et al
| First American Title Insurance and First American Title Company |
| Northwest Title Insurance Agency, Michael Smith, Jeff Williams and Kristi Carrell |
| 2:2015cv00229 |
| April 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Dustin B. Pead |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
559
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 520 Motion for New Trial; denying 492 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting in part and denying in part 493 Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for additi onal attorneys fees for post-trial activity is GRANTED in the amount outlined in the Supplemental Declaration of Amy F. Sorenson in Support of First Americans Motion for Award of Attorney Fees and Expenses. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 4/24/2017. (jds)
|
|
Filing
507
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 503 Motion for partial release of garnishment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the funds in the Northwest Chase Bank accounts ending in 1895 and 6068 are not subject to the writ of garnishme nt issued on Chase Bank until at least noon Friday January 27, 2017, provided that funds payable to Northwest Title from those accounts will be disbursed and held separately, accounted to the court and opposing counsel, and may not be used for any pu rpose pending further ruling of the court. If by noon tomorrow, Chase has not filed a response that those accounts are in fact trust accounts, this suspension of the writ will be cancelled and the writ will be in force on those accounts. If, however, such a Chase response is filed the writ suspension shall continue. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on January 26, 2017. (jcw)
|
|
Filing
501
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 494 Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment. Plaintiffs will be stayed from executing the judgment on the condition that defendants post a full bond. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 1/24/17 (alt)
|
|
Filing
475
ORDER denying 471 Motion to Set Aside Verdict for Double Recovery; denying 474 Motion to Set Aside Verdict for Failure to Instruct and Improper Instruction or for Mistrial. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 12/19/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
436
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 344 Motion to Strike all designated deposition testimony of Dennis J. Gilmore. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 12/6/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
416
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 385 Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment.The Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment and reserved portion of the 163 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART by dismissal of the tortious interference claim against Williams and Carrell, and DENIED IN PART by denial of all other relief sought. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on November 27, 2016. (DN)
|
|
Filing
393
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER mooting in part and denying in part 163 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment; granting partial summary judgment under Rule 56(f) but reserving ruling on some issues under Rule 56(f); denying 309 Motion to Reconsider; denying 309 Motion for Certification of Issue to State Supreme Court. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/23/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
331
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 263 Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Report of James S. Jardine. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/1/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
302
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 217 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 10/18/16. (dla)
|
|
Filing
286
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 101 SEALED MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 9/27/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
284
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 255 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 9/20/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
272
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part and denying in part 155 Motion for Spoilation Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 8/31/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
212
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying objections and affirming Magistrate Judge's 178 Order and 197 Order. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 6/2/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
199
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 108 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/20/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
195
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 106 Motion to Compel Complete Answers to 1st Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/19/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
193
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part and denying in part 104 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/18/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
180
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 52 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/11/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 47 Motion to Compel; granting 60 Motion to Compel; granting 61 Motion to Compel; denying 66 Motion to Compel; denying 66 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/9/16 (alt)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 36 Motion to Quash; granting 43 Motion to Quash; granting 44 Motion to Withdraw ; granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion to Quash; granting 46 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 11/9/15 (alt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
