Linin v. Neff et al
| Rex Linin |
| Chamberlin Neff and Utah Highway Patrol |
| 2:2015cv00298 |
| April 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Paul M. Warner |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
173
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Granting Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 3/23/22. (alf)
|
|
Filing
138
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 99 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 100 Motion in Limine; granting 101 Motion in Limine; granting 102 Motion in Limine; granting 103 Motion in Limine; denying 105 Mot ion in Limine; denying 106 Motion in Limine; granting 107 Motion in Limine; granting 108 Motion in Limine; granting 109 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 110 Motion in Limine. See order. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 3/18/21. (alf)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order Clarifying this Court's 38 August 2, 2016 Memorandum Decision and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court CLARIFIES its 8/2/2016 Order an d hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 21 . Because this Order moots Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Damages 54 and Defendant's Motion in Limine for the Exclusion of Irrelevant and Unduly Prejudicial Evidence 42 , the Court DENIES both motions. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 9/6/17. (dla)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 41 Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony. It is hereby ordered that Travis Jones is PROHIBITED from offering expert testimony or opinions on the subject matter outlined in his Investigation Report. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 9/1/17. (jlw)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity with regard to his reasonable suspicion determination and the expansion of the traffic stops scope. But Defendant is entitled to qualified immunity on his probable cause determination to arrest Plaintiff for DUI as well as his actions in impounding and inventorying Plaintiffs vehicle. In addition, the court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Plaintiff's claims against Defendant in his official capacity. (jlw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
