Corel Software v. Microsoft
Corel Software |
Microsoft |
2:2015cv00528 |
July 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Utah |
Jill N. Parrish |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 271 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 230 Microsofts Motion to Stay. This action is STAYED pending resolution of the Reexamination with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/14/2019. (jds) |
Filing 227 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 211 Corels motion to compel discovery from Mr. Gates. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 2/13/2019. (jds) |
Filing 221 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 178 Microsofts short form discovery motion re: reexamination discovery; denying 193 Corels motion for reconsideration of the October 5 Order.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 1/18/2019. (jds) |
Filing 205 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 159 Corel Software, LLCs Motion to Amend Final Infringement Contentions. Corel shall have seven days from the date of this order to serve its amended Final Infringement Contentions. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 11/5/2018. (jds) |
Filing 187 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 171 Microsofts short form discovery motion for a protective order; granting in part and denying in part 173 Corels short form motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 10/5/2018. (jds) |
Filing 177 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDERdenying 145 Motion for Entry of Judgment. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/31/2018. (jds) |
Filing 139 ORDER denying without prejudice 120 Motion to Take Deposition from Bill Gates; granting 134 Motion for Clarification. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 12/22/2016. (srs) |
Filing 127 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 78 Motion to Compel; granting 80 Motion to Stay until such time as the PTO determines whether to institute IPR. Should the PTO reject Microsofts IPR petitions, the stay shall be lifted. Should the PT Oinstitute IPR proceedings on some or all of Microsofts IPR petitions, the stay shall remain inplace until resolution of IPR. The parties shall complete the fact discovery ordered above, butthis matter is STAYED until the court orders otherwise. Wit hin fourteen (14)days of the date of this order, Microsoft shall provide an unredacted copy of the Lucent Licenseand identify its rule 30(b)(6) deponent. The parties shall also meet and confer regarding amutually convenient time for that deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 8/23/16. (jlw) |
Filing 61 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 37 Motion to Change Venue; denying 54 Motion for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Facts. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 2/26/16 (alt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.