Domai v. American Express et al
Guy M. Domai |
American Express, Jeff Shane, Kris Hauser, Steve Tuttle, Ken Chenault, Marianne Stinky and Al Pech |
2:2015cv00542 |
July 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Utah |
Clark Waddoups |
Paul M. Warner |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDERdenying 35 Motion to Set Aside. Motions terminated: 35 MOTION to Set Aside 29 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion for Entry of Default, Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Order on Motion for Extension of Ti filed by Guy M. Domai. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 3/14/22. (jrj) |
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER OF DISMISSAL -denying 33 Motion to Set Aside. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 12/17/19. (jmr) |
Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Case Closed.; granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to case; denying as Moot 18 Motion for Entry of Default; adopting Report and Recommendations re 24 Report and Recommendations.; denying as moot 26 Motion for Extension of Time; denying as moot 28 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 10/17/16. (jmr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.