Domai v. Ahleen et al
Guy M. Domai |
Dan Ahleen, FNU Fisher and Gateway |
2:2015cv00564 |
August 5, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Utah |
Evelyn J. Furse |
David Nuffer |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 44 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 6/8/18 (alt) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: adopting Report and Recommendations re 31 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 5/2/18 (alt) |
Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint by no later than 6/5/17: failure to do so will result in the entry of judgment in favor of Defendants and closure of the case. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 5/4/17 (alt) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: Plaintiff is to file a Notice by 6/27/16 containing the Defendants' addresses, along with the addresses of the Defendants registered agent or other person authorized to accept service of process. After plaintiff supplies the necessary information, summons will be prepared for USMS service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 6/13/16 (alt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.