Hankishiyev v. ARUP Laboratories et al
||Rafael G. Hankishiyev
||ARUP Laboratories, Tom Topie, David Rogers and Bea Layton
||September 10, 2015
||US District Court for the District of Utah
||Jill N. Parrish
||Dustin B. Pead
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 7, 2017
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART: The Report and Recommendation 115 is ADOPTED IN PART. Plaintiff's Age Discrimination Claim is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION. Defendants' 89 Motion fo r Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs remaining claims. Plaintiff's 90 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (considered as a Cross Motion for Summary Judgment) is DENIED. Plaintiff's 92 Motion to Compel Defendants to Deposit Money is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 9/7/17. (dla)
|November 10, 2015
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/10/15 (alt)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?