Peterson v. Avalon Health Care
Plaintiff: Lacie Peterson
Defendant: Avalon Health Care
Case Number: 2:2015cv00671
Filed: September 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Utah
Presiding Judge: Dee Benson
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER granting 40 Avalon Payson's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 7/31/2017. (blh)
October 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER Sustaining Objections to 27 Magistrate Judge's Order. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 10/6/2016. (blh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. Avalon Health Care
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lacie Peterson
Represented By: Steven R. Sumsion
Represented By: Kevin R. Worthy
Represented By: Jason M. Zundel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Avalon Health Care
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?