United Automobile Insurance v. Stucki & Rencher et al
Plaintiff: United Automobile Insurance
Defendant: Stucki & Rencher and Michael J. Collins
Case Number: 2:2015cv00834
Filed: November 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: Paul M. Warner
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 109 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 97 Motion for Apportionment of Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 7/10/19. (dla)
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 96 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Granting and Denying Defendants' Motions to Compel: 1) Defendants' 73 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses Per the Courts Order and an Order to Show Cause is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth. 2) Defendants' 77 Motion to Compel Full and Complete Responses to Discovery Requests is GRANTED. 3) Defendants' 78 Motion to Compel Supplemental Responses to Discovery Based on UAIC's Deposition Testimony is DENIED. 4) Defendants 79 Motion concerning Richard Parrillo is GRANTED. 5) Attorney fees are GRANTED IN PART as set forth above. 6) All discovery that is part of this order is to be provided within thirty (30) days from the date of this order unless ordered otherwise. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 5/13/19. (dla)
February 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 59 Motion to Compel Deposition of Richard Parrillo. Defendants may renew their motion provided they make a more substantial showing of need that meets the standards of the apex doctrine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 2/23/18. (dla)
October 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants discovery motions 36 Motion for Discovery, 37 Motion for Discovery, and 38 Motion for Discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED 44 Motion to Quash is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 10/2/2017. (jds)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United Automobile Insurance v. Stucki & Rencher et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United Automobile Insurance
Represented By: E. Scott Savage
Represented By: Stephen R. Waldron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stucki & Rencher
Represented By: Clay W. Stucki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Collins
Represented By: Clay W. Stucki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?