Rusk v. Fidelity Brokerage Services
| Zachary R. E. Rusk |
| Fidelity Brokerage Services |
| 2:2015cv00853 |
| December 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Jill N. Parrish |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
272
ORDER Overruling 271 Objections to 266 Memorandum Decision, Order Dismissing Case, 267 Judgment,filed by Zachary R. E. Rusk. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 5/22/2019. (jwt)
|
|
Filing
266
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION: After consideration of all the relevant factors, due to the extreme and pervasive nature of Rusk's conduct and the fact that lesser sanctions are likely to be, and have been, inef fective, the court hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Rusk's Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this court's inherent authority. All remaining motions in this action are therefore DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 4/30/19. (dla)
|
|
Filing
196
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 166 Fidelitys Motion to Dismiss. The court dismisses the portion of the fourth cause of action that seeks relief for promotions that were denied prior to October 9, 2014. The court denies Fidelitys motion to dismiss in all other respects. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 10/10/2018. (jds)
|
|
Filing
163
ORDER Adopting in Part 151 Report and Recommendation: (1) The court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART 117 Fidelity's motion to dismiss. The court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Second Amended Complaint for a failure to com ply with Rule 8(a)(2). The court further DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the religious discrimination claim under Rule 12(b)(6). The court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the Rehabilitation Act claim under Rule 12(b)(6). (2) The court DENIES 126 Fidelity' ;s motion for summary judgment. (3) The court DENIES Rusk's 159 motion to strike. (4) The court grants leave to file an amended complaint by 4/20/2018. If Rusk does not file an amended complaint by this deadline, the court shall direct the clerk of court to close this case. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 3/29/18. (dla)
|
|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 75 Motion to Appoint Counsel and Motion for Order Requiring Defendant to Maintain Evidence. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 4/24/2017. (eat)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM DECISION finding as moot 6 Motion to Seal Document ; finding as moot 10 Motion to Seal Document ; finding as moot 11 Motion to Seal Document ; finding as moot 12 Motion to Seal Document ; finding as moot 13 M otion to Seal Document. Plaintiff made numerous motions to seal documents that he filed. The documents are typically dozens or hundreds of pages of sundry materials that are irrelevant to any motion pending before the court. These documents often con tain private or sensitive information of others and are in violation of the courts policies and procedures. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2; DUCivR 5.2-1. The court is deeply troubled that Plaintiff often appears to redact or excerpt his own personal information and communications, but does not do so for others. Out of an abundance of caution for the privacy interests of individuals named in thefilings and consistent with the rules and policies of the court, the court hereby ORDERS all exhibits filed by Plaintiff in this action to be SEALED. If required, Plaintiff or others may move for specific exhibits or portions of exhibits to be unsealed. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the local rules, or court orders, or continuing to engage in harassing or other inappropriate conduct may result in filing restrictions and/or sanctions, including terminating sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/31/16. (jlw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rusk v. Fidelity Brokerage Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Zachary R. E. Rusk | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fidelity Brokerage Services | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
