Gerow v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Andrew Gerow
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 2:2015cv00894
Filed: December 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Evelyn J. Furse
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - the Court REVERSES and REMANDS this case to the Commissioner. On remand, the Commissioner will specifically consider the evidence from Drs. Clark and Shaefer and how these opinions impact the ALJs findings as to Mr. Gerows RFC and credibility. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 12/19/2016. (las)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gerow v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Gerow
Represented By: Natalie L. Bolli-Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?