Vivint v. Northstar Alarm Services
| Vivint |
| Northstar Alarm Services |
| 2:2016cv00106 |
| February 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Evelyn J. Furse |
| Robert J. Shelby |
| Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
224
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions for Summary Judgment and Granting Motions to Dismiss: The court GRANTS the 220 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Vivints First Cause of Action, DENIES AS MOOT [2 02] NorthStar's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the First Cause of Action, GRANTS the 221 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss in Part Vivint's Fifth Cause of Action 221 , DENIES 157 Vivint's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fifth Cause of Action, and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART 154 NorthStar's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 3/8/19. (dla)
|
|
Filing
153
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: The court ADOPTS IN PART the 142 Report and Recommendation. NorthStar's 113 Motion for Leave to Amend Answer to Assert Counterclaims and Additional Affirmative Defenses is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 3/23/18. (dla)
|
|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM DECISION (redacted) AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT: Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/14/17. (jlw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
