Burke v. Bigelow
Petitioner: Ryan David Burke
Respondent: Alfred Bigelow
Case Number: 2:2016cv00285
Filed: April 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Sanpete
Presiding Judge: Robert J. Shelby
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS: granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. The petition is DISMISSED with Prejudice. Denying 13 Motion to Strike; Granting 16 Motion to Respond. This case is closed. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 09/18/2017. (kpf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burke v. Bigelow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ryan David Burke
Represented By: Daniel B. Garriott
Represented By: Tahnee L. Hamilton
Represented By: Steven R. Paul
Represented By: Denver C. Snuffer, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Alfred Bigelow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?