Allen v. Utah State Prison et al
| Paul C. Allen |
| Utah State Prison, Scott Crowther, Erik Yorgason, Billie Casper, Joe Hughes, Doug Cook, D. Hardcastle, Lynette I., Jerry Pope and Lucy Aragon |
| 2:2016cv00324 |
| April 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| David Nuffer |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER Requiring Martinez Report and Dispositive Motion. It is hereby ordered that : Defendants must within 90 days file a Martinez Report. denying 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel. See order for details. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/16/2017. (kpf)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER: Plaintiff must within thirty days cure the Complaint's deficiencies noted above. The Clerk's Office shall mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se litigant Guide with a form complaint for Plaintiff to use should he choose to file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to timely cure the above deficiencies according to this ORDERS instructions, this action will be dismissed without further notice. Denying 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive ; denying 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel; finding as moot 11 Motion for Default Judgment; finding as moot 13 Motion for Entry of Default; denying 15 Motion for appointment of new judgment. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 02/06/2017. (kpf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
