Vigil v. State of Utah
State of Utah |
Paul R. Vigil |
2:2016cv00794 |
July 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Salt Lake |
Clark Waddoups |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS: granting 21 Motion to Dismiss. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk's Office shall mail a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide with a form complaint for Plaintiff to use should he choose to file a civil rights complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this action. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 08/15/2018. (kpf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vigil v. State of Utah | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Paul R. Vigil | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State of Utah | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.