Sabey v. Crowther et al
Cody J. Sabey |
Scott Crowther and Board of Pardons |
2:2016cv00893 |
August 22, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Salt Lake |
Clark Waddoups |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO DISMISS-granting 35 Motion to Dismiss ; Motions terminated: 35 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Board of Pardons, Scott Crowther. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 9/14/18. (jmr) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER TO AMEND DEFICIENT PETITION: denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 7 Motion for Service of Process (Prisoner); denying 9 Motion to Seal; denying 9 Motion for Hearing; granting 13 Mo tion for Leave to File; denying 14 Motion for Service of Process (Prisoner); granting 16 Motion for Leave to File; granting 17 Motion for Leave to File; denying 20 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 22 Motion for settlement conferenc e. The Clerks Office shall mail Petitioner a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide witha proper form petition and/or civil-rights complaint for him to complete, according to the directions. Under the terms of this Order, Petitioner is moreover required to amend his petition to proceed further with this action. However, the information contained in each of those motions must be incorporated into one cohesive amended petition. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 07/31/2017. (kpf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.