Becker v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation et al
| Lynn D. Becker |
| Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, Uintah and Ouray Tribal Business Committee and Ute Energy Holdings |
| Uintah and Ouray Tribal Business Committee, Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation and Ute Energy Holdings |
| Lynn D. Becker |
| Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, Uintah and Ouray Tribal Business Committee and Ute Energy Holdings |
| Lynn D. Becker and Barry G. Lawrence |
| 2:2016cv00958 |
| September 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Duchesne |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
325
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 303 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 303 Motion for Relief from Judgment Under Rule 60; granting 318 Motion to Stay Judgment pending appeal; granting 318 Motion to Permit Defendants to Post Alternative Security and Offset the Amount of Security Required - the court accepts the Tribe's Becker Litigation Reserve Fund as sufficient security to stay the 2/11/22 judgment, and the court permits the Tribe to temporarily setoff the $236,392.75 judgment by the allowable costs that Mr. Becker owes, $26,868.59. The Tribe shall maintain the Becker Litigation Reserve Fund until further order from the court. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 5/4/22 (alt)
|
|
Filing
315
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 302 Motion to Recover Costs and Damages Against Injunction Bonds: one issued in 2016 by Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and one issued in 2018 by Hartford Fire Insurance Company. Both are now payable to Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 4/4/22 (alt)
|
|
Filing
260
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER -denying as moot 206 Motion to Quash; denying as moot 214 Motion for Protective Order; Motions terminated: 206 MOTION to Quash THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DIRECTED TO SNOW CHRISTENSEN & MARTINEAU and Memorandum in Support filed by Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, Uintah and Ouray Tribal Business Committee, Ute Energy Holdings, 214 MOTION for Protective Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Snow Christensen & Martineau, John P. Jurrius. Becker and Jurrius are ORDERED to, within ten (10) days of the date of this order, tosubmit to the court a sworn and itemized statement showing the actual time expended in such matters and the rate at which fees were computed. See Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 3/31/21. (jrj)
|
|
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM DECISION AMD ORDER REVERSING DENIAL OF AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION-granting 70 Motion for Preliminary Injunction sua sponte; deferring ruling on 73 Motion for Summary Judgmen t ; denying 73 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 73 Motion for Permanent Injunction ; deferring ruling on 74 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 74 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 74 Motion for Permanent Injunctio n ; granting in part and denying in part 108 Motion ; denying as moot 124 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 130 Motion for Protective Order; granting 145 Motion ; granting 147 Motion. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/30/18. (jmr)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying 101 Motion to Reassign Case. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on February 13, 2018. (DN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
