Hampton v. Utah Transit Authority

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Utah District Court Hampton v. Utah Transit Authority

Hampton v. Utah Transit Authority

Plaintiff:	Steven Hampton
Defendant:	Utah Transit Authority
Case Number:	2:2016cv01282
Filed:	December 27, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Utah
Office:	Central Office
County:	Utah
Presiding Judge:	Brooke C. Wells
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 0626
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 26, 2018	Filing 30 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - Mr. Hampton is not entitled to punitive damages under the ADEA. His claim for punitive damages is STRICKEN from the amended complaint. UTAs motion 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 2/26/2018. (jds)
September 7, 2017	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order Denying in Part and Granting in Part the UTA's 5 Motion to Dismiss. The UTA's motion to dismiss the ADEA claim is DENIED. The UTA's motion to dismiss the second age discrimination claim is GRANTED. Dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE. The UTA's motion to dismiss the breach of contract claim is GRANTED. Dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court grants Mr. Hampton leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order if he wishes to do so. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 9/7/17. (dla)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 26, 2018

Filing 30 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - Mr. Hampton is not entitled to punitive damages under the ADEA. His claim for punitive damages is STRICKEN from the amended complaint. UTAs motion 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 2/26/2018. (jds)

September 7, 2017

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order Denying in Part and Granting in Part the UTA's 5 Motion to Dismiss. The UTA's motion to dismiss the ADEA claim is DENIED. The UTA's motion to dismiss the second age discrimination claim is GRANTED. Dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE. The UTA's motion to dismiss the breach of contract claim is GRANTED. Dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court grants Mr. Hampton leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order if he wishes to do so. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 9/7/17. (dla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hampton v. Utah Transit Authority
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Hampton
Represented By:	Peter L. Lattin
Represented By:	Kenneth Parkinson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Utah Transit Authority
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?