McRae v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Stephen Plato McRae |
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Iron County Correctional Facility, Purgatory Correctional Facility, FNU Cheney, FNU Shafer and FNU Fielding |
2:2017cv00066 |
January 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Iron |
Robert J. Shelby |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND DISMISSAL ORDER - Having comprehensively analyzed the Ehrenhaus factors against the timeline and Plaintiff's lack of responsiveness here, the Court again concludes that dismissal is appropriate. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 03/09/2022. (jl) |
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order. Plaintiff's post-judgment motion is GRANTED, ( 49 ). The dismissal order and judgment are therefore VACATED. ( 46 , 47 .) Within thirty days, Plaintiff must file a third amended complaint curing th e deficiencies recited in the Court's order of November 13, 2019, ( 44 ), or risk dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 01/03/2022. (Attachments: # 1 11/13/2019 Memorandum Decision, # 2 pro-se-litigation packet, # 3 blank federal civil rights complaint). (jl) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER: DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT: denying 49 Motion to Amend/Correct. This action remains closed. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 03/01/2021. (kpf) |
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER: It is therefore ordered that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 1/16/2020. (kpf) |
Filing 44 Memorandum Decision and Order Cure Deficient Second Amended Complaint: It is ordered Plaintiff must within THIRTY DAYS cure the Second Amended Complaint's deficiencies noted above by filing a document entitle, "Third Amended Complaint." All defendants and claims should be included in a third amended complaint, if filed, and will not be treated further by the Court unless properly included. This is the fifth and FINAL order allowing Plaintiff to cure deficiencies. I f a third amended complaint is filed, the Court will screen it for dismissal or service of process. The Clerk's Office shall mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide with a form complaint and habeas petition for Plaintiff to use shoul d he choose to file another amended complaint or habeas corpus petition. If Plaintiff fails to timely cure the above deficiencies according to this Order's instructions, this action will be dismissed without further notice. Plaintiff shall not t ry to serve the third amended complaint on Defendants; instead the Court will perform its screening function and determine itself whether the complaint warrants service. See order for details. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 11/13/2019. (kpf) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER: denying 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel; Denied/finding as moot 7 Motion to Amend/Correct; Denied/finding as moot 10 Motion for preliminary Injunctive relief, Plaintiff must within thirty days cure th e Complaint's deficiencies noted. The Clerk's Office shall mail Paintiff a copy of the Pro Se litigant Guide with a form complaint and habeas petition for plaintiff to use should be choose to file another amended complaint or habeas corpus petition. If Plaintiff fails to timely cure the above deficiencies according to this Orders instructions, this action will be dismissed. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 06/14/2017. (kpf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.