Kamper v. The Hartford
Plaintiff: Michelle Kamper
Defendant: The Hartford
Case Number: 2:2017cv00101
Filed: February 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: Jill N. Parrish
Presiding Judge: Paul M. Warner
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1362
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 30 Report and Recommendations. Denying 17 Ms. Kampers Motion for Decision on the Administrative Record ; granting 22 The Hartfords Motion for Summary Judgment on ERISA Claims. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to case. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 3/20/2018. (jds)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kamper v. The Hartford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Kamper
Represented By: Loren M. Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Hartford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?