Federal National Mortgage Association v. Takas
Federal National Mortgage Association |
Kris Takas |
Kris Takas |
Federal National Mortgage Association, CIT Group, Backman Title Services and Ben Carson |
2:2017cv00204 |
March 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Salt Lake |
Paul M. Warner |
Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 4 FNMA and CIT Bank's Motion to Dismiss the First Fourteen Causes of Action in Ms. Takas's Counterclaim, only with respect to the Eighth Cause of Action; granting 33 Mr. Carson 39;s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ; granting as moot 35 Third-Party Defendant Backman Title Services' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to the court's 6/2/2017, Order dismissing all claims against Backman Ti tle Services. Because this Memorandum Decision and Order dismisses all of the claims against federal agencies and pursuant to federal law, the court also REMANDS this action back to the state court to resolve all remaining claims, counterclaims, and third-party claims in this action. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 7/14/17. (dla) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Denying 15 Defendant's and Third Party Plaintiff's Request to Refer this Matter to Mediation with the Court's ADR Program. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 5/5/17. (dla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.