Ellis v. Salt Lake City Corporation et al
| Martha Ellis |
| Salt Lake City Corporation, Jackie Biskupski, Brian Dale, Karl Lieb and Robert McMicken |
| 2:2017cv00245 |
| March 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Jill N. Parrish |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
206
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 182 Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider and denying 188 Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Defendants' Appeal as Frivolous. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 12/5/23. (dle)
|
|
Filing
180
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 150 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 3/31/23. (dle)
|
|
Filing
171
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 165 Short Term Discovery Motion to Compel; terminating 165 Motion to Expedite. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 9/27/2022. (alf)
|
|
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH OR LIMIT SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 4/15/2022. (reb)
|
|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 98 Motion to Amend/Correct - Reconsider Order 87 . Motion to Reconsider is GRANTED. The court REINSTATES Plaintiff's Fourth Cause of Action as it relates to her May 2016 demotion. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/10/21. (alf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
