Beesley v. Brinton et al
| Mark Beesley |
| Gary R. Brinton and Zibalstar |
| 2:2017cv00735 |
| July 3, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Utah |
| Dustin B. Pead |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
509
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part 491 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff, as the prevailing party, is entitled to costs in the amount of $5,710.09 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). Plaintiff is also entitled to a total attorney fee award of $275,919.36, calculated by taking the total requested amount of $375,863.86 and subtracting $2,765 for time spent on the failed mediation, $2,645 for time spent on the short form discovery motion, $665 for the issues related to Ted Hansen's testimony, $83,012.50 for time spent on the Motions in Limine, and $10,857 for having completely redacted various time entries. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 4/17/2025. (mh)
|
Filing
487
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - The court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's 452 Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. The court will concurrently enter a separate written judgment in accordance with Judge Jenkins' final decree. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 1/3/2025. (mh)
|
Filing
439
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 412 Motion for Summary Judgment and 411 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 2/22/24. (dle)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.