K. et al v. United Behavioral Health et al
| David K., Kathleen K. and Amy K. |
| United Behavioral Health and Alcatel-Lucent Medical Expense Plan for Active Management Employees |
| 2:2017cv01328 |
| December 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Dustin B. Pead |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 119 Motion for Attorney Fees. The court reduces Plaintiffs' requested award for attorneys' fees and ORDERS Defendants to pay $67,475 in attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 10/3/2023. (eat)
|
|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 100 Motion for Benefit Award, Prejudgment Interest, Attorney Fees, and Costs. The court reduces Plaintiffs' requested award for attorney fees and ORDERS Defendants to pay Plaintiffs $88,505 in recoverable benefits, 10% per annum in prejudgment interest, $44,955 in attorney fees, and $400 in costs. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 9/7/2021. (eat)
|
|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 75 Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 77 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs' Mot ion is GRANTED as to their First Cause of Action for ERISA violations. The court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion on their Second Cause of Action for Parity Act violations. This means that the court similarly GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defend ants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' First Cause of Action for ERISA violations and GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' Second Cause of Action for violations of the Parity Act. Since Defendants' denials were arbitrary and capricious, the court will not remand the claims to Defendants and instead orders Defendants to pay for A.K.'s treatment at Discovery. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 6/22/2021. (eat)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 64 Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery; and granting in part and denying in part the parties' 68 Stipulated Motion to Stay Amended Scheduling Order. The parties shall submit a proposed scheduling order to the court within 14 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 7/22/2020. (eat)
|
|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 1/17/2020. (eat)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying Defendants' 20 Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively to Transfer Venue in its entirety. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 10/24/2018. (eat)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
