Sorensen v. Polukoff et al
| Sherman G. Sorensen |
| Gerald I. Polukoff, Zabriskie Law Firm, Rhome Zabriskie, Fleming Nolen & Jez and Rand P. Nolen |
| 2:2018cv00067 |
| January 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Brooke C. Wells |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER-denying 133 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment without prejudice; granting 140 Motion for Discovery; Motions terminated: 140 Plaintiff's MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support < i>Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) filed by Sherman G. Sorensen, 133 Defendant's MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Rand P. Nolen, Fleming Nolen & Jez, Zabriskie Law Firm, Gerald I. Polukoff, Rhome Zabriskie. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 11/16/20. (jrj)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 102 Motion to Dismiss. See Order for Details. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 4/7/2020. (las)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 61 Motion for Sanctions; denying 75 Motion for Leave to File a Surreply. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/24/18. (jlw)
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order GRANTING 47 Defendant's Renewed Motion to Dismiss RICO claims. Plaintiff's RICO claims are dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that 55 Conditional Motion for Retentio n of Supplemental Jurisdiction is DENIED. The Court declines to extend supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state-law claims and dismisses them without prejudice. It is furtherORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for for Preliminary Injunction 36 is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 7/31/18. (jlw)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs request for declaratory relief under HIPAA is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs RICO claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the Complaint as to the RICO claim within fourteen (14) days of this Order. Defendants may then renew their Motion to Dismiss as to the RICO claim only. All other arguments addressed in Defendants Motion to Dismiss are taken under advisement. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 4/30/18. (jlw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
