Stewart v. Utah Department of Corrections
| Calvin Paul Stewart |
| Utah Department of Corrections |
| 2:2018cv00174 |
| February 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Sanpete |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER:Denying 18 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Dft must within 20 days to file an answer and within 90 days file a Martinez report and summary judgment motion. When served with the Summary Judgment motio n, Plaintiff must submit a response within 30 days of the motion's filing date. Plaintiffs information and convenience, the Court has attached the procedural rules governing summary judgment practice. No time extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 05/07/2021. (kpf)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS: 1. It is ordered that the Clerk of Court Shall mail: A. Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, AO form 398; 2 copies of Waiver of the Service of Summon s, AO form 399; and copies of Amended Complaint, no. 14 and this Order to: Utah Department of Corrections, Att'n: Correctional Program Coordinator- 3rd Floor DPO Suite, 14717 South Minuteman Drive, Draper, Utah 84020 B. Copies of Amen ded Complaint and this Order to Utah Attorney General's Office, Att'n: Litigation Division, Prisoner Litigation Unit, 160 East 300 South, Sixth Floor, PO Box 140856, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-0856. See order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 06/18/2020. (kpf)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENT COMPLAINT: It is ordered that Plaintiff must within thirty days cure the complaint's deficiencies 5 noted by filing a document entitled, "Amended Complaint" 2) The Clerk&# 039;s Office shall mail Plaintiff the Pro Se Litigant Guide with a blank form civil rights complaint which Plaintiff must use if he wishes to pursue with a blank civil rights complaint which Plaintiff must use if he wishes to pursue an amended compla int. 3) If Plaintiff fails to timely cure the above deficiencies according to this Order's instructions, this action will be dismissed without further notice. 4) Plaintiff shall not try to serve the amended complaint of Dfts; instead the Court will perform its screening function and determine itself whether the amended complaint warrants service. No Motion for service of process is needed. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 05/31/2019. (kpf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stewart v. Utah Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Calvin Paul Stewart | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Utah Department of Corrections | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
