AST Design et al v. Prime Time NYC
Plaintiff: AS Design and AST Design
Defendant: Prime Time NYC
Case Number: 2:2018cv00675
Filed: August 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: David Nuffer
Referring Judge: Paul M Warner
2 Judge: Brooke C Wells
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. So ordered by Judge David Nuffer on 9/27/18 (docket text only - no attached document) (alt)
September 24, 2018 Filing 11 Report on the Final Decision of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (alt)
September 24, 2018 Filing 10 STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT finding that Plaintiffs have valid and enforceable rights in the patents and Defendant has directly infringed, contributorily infringed, and induced others to infringe claims as to the patents. The parties have agreed to settlement of the matter in issue between them and to entry of this consent judgment - CASE CLOSED. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 9/21/18 (alt)
September 24, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #6 Consent to Entry. The document is not a Consent to Entry but a proposed order filed incorrectly. Proposed orders should be filed as attachments to the motion requesting their entry. (alt)
September 18, 2018 Filing 8 After review of the case, case reassigned to District Judge per 7 Docket Text Order. Case randomly assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to the case. (las)
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DOCKET TEXT ORDER FOR CASE TO BE REASSIGNED. Because Defendant has not yet entered an appearance, consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge by all parties is not possible at this time. Further, Plaintiffs have filed #5 Stipulated MOTION for Entry of Judgment and #6 CONSENT TO ENTRY of Stipulated Judgment, which are ripe for decision. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be reassigned to a District Judge through random reassignment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 9/17/2018. (docket text order, no attached document). (abs)
September 14, 2018 Filing 6 ERROR: NOT A CONSENT TO ENTRY - CONSENT TO ENTRY of Stipulated Judgment filed by AS Design, AST Design. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Claim chart for claim 21 of US 9526304, #2 Exhibit B - Claim chart for claim 1 of US 9770076, #3 Exhibit C - Claim chart for claim 1 of US9775413)(McConkie, Roger) Modified on 9/24/2018: added error text (alt)
September 14, 2018 Filing 5 Stipulated MOTION for Entry of Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs AS Design, AST Design. (McConkie, Roger)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE: Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in form of a draft attorney meeting report. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 08/30/2018. (kpf)
August 29, 2018 Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (nl)
August 29, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Prime Time NYC (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3091726) filed by AST Design, AS Design. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent 9,526,304, #2 Exhibit B- U.S. Patent 9,770,076, #3 Exhibit C- U.S. Patent 9,775,413, #4 Exhibit D- 90013994 Reexamination Certificate, #5 Exhibit E- Claim chart for claim 21 of US 9526304, #6 Exhibit F- Claim chart for claim 1 of US 9770076, #7 Exhibit G- Claim chart for claim 1 of US9775413, #8 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner (McConkie, Roger)
August 29, 2018 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner. Plaintiffs AS Design, AST Design is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AST Design et al v. Prime Time NYC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AS Design
Represented By: Roger J. McConkie
Represented By: Brittany Frandsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AST Design
Represented By: Roger J. McConkie
Represented By: Brittany Frandsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prime Time NYC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?