Haws v. Cedar City Police Department
| Ricky Haws |
| Cedar City Police Department |
| 2:2018cv00810 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Evelyn J Furse |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 48 U.S.C. ยง 1985 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING: (Notice generated by EJF Chambers) Status Conference set for 1/8/2019 at 02:00 PM in Rm 7.400 before Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse. Hearing was inadvertently set before Judge Waddoups. The notice now reflects the correct Judge that will be holding the hearing.Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah (lnp) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF HEARING: (Notice generated by EJF Chambers) Status Conference set for 1/8/2019 at 02:00 PM in Rm 7.400 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah (lnp) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. #6 Order sent to Ricky Haws. Returned as No such Address in Salt Lake City, Utah. Address did not match what is on the docket, so clerk re-mailed #6 Order with address on docket, which is in Orem not Salt Lake. (mas) |
Filing 6
ORDER denying #4 Motion for Pro Se Electronic Notification. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 10/25/18. (jmr)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse under 28:636 (b)(1)(B), Magistrate to handle case up to and including R&R on all dispositive matters. No attached document. ORDER REFERRING MOTION #4 MOTION for Pro Se Electronic Notification filed by Ricky Haws Motions referred to Evelyn J. Furse. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 10/25/2018. (tcs)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Se Electronic Notification filed by Plaintiff Ricky Haws. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Electronic Notice Registration Form)(tlh) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Cedar City Police Department (Originally received by the court on 10/17/2018). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Ricky Haws. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Judge Clark Waddoups (tlh) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 10/22/2018. (tlh)
|
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Ricky Haws. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 10/17/2018) (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Haws v. Cedar City Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ricky Haws | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cedar City Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
