Madill v. Tidwell et al
| Raymond Scott Madill |
| FNU Hallam and FNU Tidwell |
| Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 2:2018cv00814 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel (Originally received by the court on 10/18/2018) filed by Plaintiff Raymond Scott Madill. (nl) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against FNU Hallam, FNU Tidwell (Originally received by the court on 10/18/2018). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Raymond Scott Madill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-3rd Level Grievances and Responses for All Claims, #2 Envelope 1) Assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby (nl) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial fee: TBD. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this order to file with the Court a certified copy of his inmate trust account statements. Collection of Fees Sent: No Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 10/29/2018. (nl)
|
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 10/18/2018) filed by Plaintiff Raymond Scott Madill. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
