Hyper Scratcher v. 4B Production Enhancement et al
| Hyper Scratcher |
| Robert Ballou, Brian Ballou, 4B Production Enhancement and Tara Ballou |
| 2:2018cv00826 |
| October 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Brooke C Wells |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Tara Ballou. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
| Filing 11 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Brian Ballou. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
| Filing 10 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Robert Ballou. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
| Filing 9 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to 4B Production Enhancement. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hyper Scratcher with Jury Demand. New Defendants: Tara Ballou. filed by Hyper Scratcher. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2) (Madsen, Bradley) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Timothy J. Pearse for Hyper Scratcher. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 11/14/2018. (las)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Timothy J. Pearse , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3144289, filed by Plaintiff Hyper Scratcher. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order for Pro Hac Vice Admission)(Madsen, Bradley) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney J.N. Murdock and Timothy J. Pearse, for Plaintiff Hyper Scratcher. (nl) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Wayne A. Jones, for Plaintiff Hyper Scratcher. (nl) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (nl) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3130475) filed by Hyper Scratcher. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells (Madsen, Bradley) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells. Plaintiff Hyper Scratcher is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
