Stylebuy.com v. Stylebuy Group
| Stylebuy.com |
| Stylebuy Group |
| 2:2018cv00865 |
| November 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Paul M Warner |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1127 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Notice of Filing Proposed Order by Stylebuy.com re #14 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Attachments: #1 Supplement Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal) (Sumsion, Steven) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Stylebuy.com (Sumsion, Steven) |
| Filing 13 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Stylebuy Group. (jwt) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE REMINDER - All parties are requested to respond within the time frame set forth in the #9 Notice of Presiding Magistrate Assignment, pursuant to General Order 07-001. If you have already consented/objected, please disregard this notice. No judge will be informed of a party's response unless all parties have consented to the assignment of the matter to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Unless consents from all parties are received within fifteen(15) days, the case will be randomly re-assigned to a U.S. District Judge without further notice.# Link to Magistrate Consent Objection form (jwt) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST for Judicial Notice re #10 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Stylebuy Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Certificate of Status, #2 Exhibit B - Certified Copy of Entire Filed at Division of Corporations for Utah)(Burton, H.) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Stylebuy Group. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Burton, H.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Stylebuy Group, Plaintiff Stylebuy.com. Form due by 12/13/2018. (las) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Stylebuy Group, Plaintiff Stylebuy.com. (las) |
| Filing 7 CLERKS ORDER signed by Anne Morgan. Answer deadline updated for Stylebuy Group answer due 12/11/2018. (las) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint,, and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Stylebuy Group. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Attorney H. Dickson Burton added to party Stylebuy Group(pty:dft)(Burton, H.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Limited Appearance of Counsel by Stylebuy Group (Burton, H.) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 11/5/2018. (las)
|
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (nl) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Stylebuy Group (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3137819) filed by Stylebuy.com. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to Complaint, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C to Complaint, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D to Complaint, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E to Complaint, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F to Complaint, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G to Complaint, #9 Exhibit Exhibit H to Complaint, #10 Exhibit Exhibit I to Complaint, #11 Exhibit Exhibit J to Complaint, #12 Exhibit Exhibit K to Complaint, #13 Exhibit Exhibit L to Complaint) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner (Sumsion, Steven) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner. Plaintiff Stylebuy.com is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stylebuy.com v. Stylebuy Group | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stylebuy.com | |
| Represented By: | Cameron Steven Christensen |
| Represented By: | Steven R. Sumsion |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stylebuy Group | |
| Represented By: | H. Dickson Burton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
