Vick v. Twinlab Consolidation
Plaintiff: David Vick
Defendant: Twinlabs Consolidation and Twinlab Consolidation
Case Number: 2:2018cv00903
Filed: November 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jill N Parrish
Referring Judge: Brooke C Wells
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Filing 11 The deadline for submission of Consent/Reassignment Forms has now passed. One or more of the parties did not file, therefore the case is no longer eligible for magistrate assignment. Case randomly assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish. Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells no longer assigned to the case. (las)
December 7, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION to Change Venue and Memorandum in Support or in the Alternative to Compel Arbitration of Plaintiff's Claims and Stay Further Proceedings filed by Defendant Twinlab Consolidation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Offer Letter, #2 Exhibit 2 - General Release)(Burke, Paul)
December 5, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE REMINDER - All parties are requested to respond within the time frame set forth in the #5 Notice of Presiding Magistrate Assignment,, pursuant to General Order 07-001. If you have already consented/objected, please disregard this notice. No judge will be informed of a party's response unless all parties have consented to the assignment of the matter to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Unless consents from all parties are received within fifteen(15) days, the case will be randomly re-assigned to a U.S. District Judge without further notice.# Link to Magistrate Consent Objection form (las)
December 5, 2018 Filing 8 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Twinlab Consolidation. (las)
November 20, 2018 Filing 7 File Received from Fourth District Court - Provo, Utah County consisting of docket sheet and documents filed in state court. (Attachments: #1 State Complaint, #2 Notic of Removal) (las)
November 19, 2018 Filing 6 CLERKS ORDER Granting Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint re #2 Notice of Removal, signed by Anne Morgan. Answer deadline updated for Twinlab Consolidation answer due 12/7/2018. (las)
November 19, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Twinlab Consolidation, Plaintiff David Vick. Form due by 12/4/2018. (tlh) Modified by correcting dft name on 11/19/2018 (rks).
November 19, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Twinlab Consolidation, Plaintiff David Vick. (tlh) Modified by correcting dft name on 11/19/2018 (rks).
November 19, 2018 Filing 3 Ex Parte (Not Sealed) MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Pursuant to DUCivR 77-2(a) filed by Defendant Twinlab Consolidation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dibble, David) Modified by correcting dft name on 11/19/2018 (rks).
November 19, 2018 NAME CORRECTION of Twinlabs Consolidation. Corrected Name: Twinlab Consolidation. Refer to document number: #2 . Name was entered incorrectly at case opening. (rks)
November 16, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 4th District Court Utah County, case number 180401694, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3148514) filed by Twinlab Consolidation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Information Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Removal for State Court, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells (Burke, Paul) Modified by correcting dft name on 11/19/2018 (rks).
November 16, 2018 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells. Defendant Twinlab Consolidation is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (tlh) Modified by correcting dft name on 11/19/2018 (rks).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vick v. Twinlab Consolidation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Twinlabs Consolidation
Represented By: David B. Dibble
Represented By: Paul C. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Twinlab Consolidation
Represented By: David B. Dibble
Represented By: Paul C. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Vick
Represented By: Russell A. Nevers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?