Canberra Subdivision v. Harper et al
| Canberra Subdivision |
| George E Harper Jr Trust Dated the 18th day of July 2017, The, George E. Harper and Maple Mountain Recovery |
| 2:2018cv00916 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Evelyn J Furse |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Canberra Subdivision as to Maple Mountain Recovery served on 12/21/2018, answer due 1/11/2019. (McDonald, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Canberra Subdivision as to George E Harper Jr Trust Dated the 18th day of July 2017, The served on 12/21/2018, answer due 1/11/2019. (McDonald, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Canberra Subdivision as to George E. Harper served on 12/21/2018, answer due 1/11/2019. (McDonald, Daniel) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE- Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendants in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See Order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 11/28/18. (jmr)
|
| Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Maple Mountain Recovery. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
| Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to George E. Harper. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
| Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to George E Harper Jr Trust Dated the 18th day of July 2017, The. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 11/27/2018. (ncw)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3151494) filed by Canberra Subdivision. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of violation of the Restrictions, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Clark Waddoups (McDonald, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Clark Waddoups. Plaintiff Canberra Subdivision is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
