Bouncin Bins Rentals v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance et al
| Bouncin Bins Rentals |
| Nationwide Mutual Insurance and Amco Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv00925 |
| November 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Tena Campbell |
| Brooke C Wells |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Bouncin Bins Rentals. (Bosserman, Hyrum) |
Filing 11
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 12/21/18 (alt)
|
| Filing 10 All Consent/Reassignment Forms have now been received. After review of all forms, Case Reassigned to District Judge per request of one or more party(s). Case randomly assigned to Judge Tena Campbell. Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells no longer assigned to the case. (las) |
| Filing 9 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Bouncin Bins Rentals. (las) |
| Filing 8 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendants Amco Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance. (las) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendants Amco Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance identifying Allied Holdings, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Martin, Byron) |
| Filing 6 File Received from Third District Court - Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County consisting of docket and documents filed in State Court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Return of Service, #3 Return of Service) (las) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Amco Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Plaintiff Bouncin Bins Rentals. Form due by 12/18/2018. (tlh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Amco Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance and Plaintiff Bouncin Bins Rentals. (tlh) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #2 ) filed by Amco Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance. (Martin, Byron) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3156564) filed by Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Amco Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Notice of Service - AMCO, #4 Exhibit C- Notice of Service - Nationwide) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells (Martin, Byron) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells. Defendants Amco Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Insurance are directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
