Lopez v. Berryhill
Andrea J. Lopez |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
SSA Notice |
2:2019cv00009 |
January 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Brooke C Wells |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Plaintiff Andrea J. Lopez. (las) |
Filing 12 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Andrea J. Lopez. (las) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer A. Randall on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Randall, Jennifer) |
Filing 10 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (las) |
Filing 9 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Plaintiff Andrea J. Lopez. Form due by 3/15/2019. (las) |
Filing 8 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD received from Social Security Administration filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Vol 01 Certification Page, #2 Exhibit Vol 02 Court Transcript Index, #3 Exhibit Vol 03 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #4 Exhibit Vol 04 Payment Documents and Decisions, #5 Exhibit Vol 05 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #6 Exhibit Vol 06 Non Disability Related Development, #7 Exhibit Vol 07 Disability Related Development Part 1, #8 Exhibit Vol 08 Disability Related Development Part 2, #9 Exhibit Vol 09 Medical Records Part 1, #10 Exhibit Vol 10 Medical Records Part 2, #11 Exhibit Vol 11 Medical Records Part 3, #12 Exhibit Vol 12 Medical Records Part 4, #13 Exhibit Vol 13 Medical Records Part 5, #14 Exhibit Vol 14 Medical Records Part 6, #15 Exhibit Vol 15 Medical Records Part 7, #16 Exhibit Vol 16 Medical Records Part 8, #17 Exhibit Vol 17 Medical Records Part 9, #18 Exhibit Vol 18 Medical Records Part 10, #19 Exhibit Vol 19 Medical Records Part 11, #20 Exhibit Vol 20 Medical Records Part 12, #21 Exhibit Vol 21 Medical Records Part 13, #22 Exhibit Vol 22 Medical Records Part 14)(Berndt, Amanda) |
Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to #3 Complaint, filed by Nancy A. Berryhill. Attorney Amanda A. Berndt added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft)(Berndt, Amanda) |
Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued as to US Attorney for the District of Utah.(tlh) |
Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued as to US Attorney General. (tlh). |
Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration. (tlh). |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill (Originally received by the court on 01/04/2019). (Filing fee $ 400) (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Andrea J. Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeals Action from Social Security, #2 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells (tlh) |
Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 01/7/2019. (tlh) |
Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 01/04/2019) filed by Plaintiff Andrea J. Lopez. (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.