R. et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas et al
| Kerry R. and A. R. |
| First National Bank Medical Benefits Plan and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas |
| 2:2019cv00040 |
| January 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Evelyn J Furse |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Stipulated Motion to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint: Defendants shall have to and including 4/11/2019 in which to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 3/12/19. (dla)
|
| Filing 7 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint, and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, First National Bank Medical Benefits Plan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Evelyn J. Furse.(Petersen, Scott) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas - answer due 3/12/2019. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 2/11/19. (jwt)
|
| Filing 5 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply and Memorandum in Support to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendants Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, First National Bank Medical Benefits Plan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Extending Deadline to Respond to Complaint) Motions referred to Evelyn J. Furse. Attorney Scott M. Petersen added to party Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas (pty:dft), Attorney Scott M. Petersen added to party First National Bank Medical Benefits Plan(pty:dft)(Petersen, Scott) Modified on 2/11/2019 - motion relief adjusted to Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer(jwt). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 2/8/19. (dla)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 2/7/2019. (mjm)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, First National Bank Medical Benefits Plan (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3185173) filed by Kerry R., A. R.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet) Assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby (King, Brian) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby. Plaintiffs A. R., Kerry R. is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
