Bodyguard Productions v. Netpro, et al.
Bodyguard Productions |
Internet Subscribers 1-9, Jeff Dunn, Natividad Donovan and Netpro |
2:2019cv00324 |
May 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
David Nuffer |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Jeff Dunn. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nl) |
Filing 11 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Natividad Donovan. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nl) |
Filing 10 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Netpro. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nl) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Internet Subscribers 1-9 with Jury Demand. New Defendants: Netpro, Natividad Donovan, Jeff Dunn. Removed Defendants: Internet Subscribers 1-9. filed by Bodyguard Productions. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Copyright Registration, #2 Exhibit B - IP Information) (Zenger, Todd) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Internet Subscribers 5-9, Without Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Bodyguard Productions (Zenger, Todd) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Limited Discovery. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 5/13/19 (alt) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 5/13/19 (alt) |
Filing 5 Report on the Filing of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (nl) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION of Daniel Arheidt in Support re #3 Ex Parte (Not Sealed) MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Bodyguard Productions. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Regional IP Data)(Zenger, Todd) |
Filing 3 Ex Parte (Not Sealed) MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Bodyguard Productions. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Copyright Registration, #2 Exhibit B - Subscriber Data, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Zenger, Todd) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Internet Subscribers 1-9 (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3272538) filed by Bodyguard Productions. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Copyright Registration, #2 Exhibit B - IP Information, #3 Civil Cover Sheet.) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (Zenger, Todd) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Plaintiff Bodyguard Productions is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.