Howell v. Department of the Treasury et al
Patricia Howell |
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service |
2:2019cv00357 |
May 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Cecilia M Romero |
Brooke C Wells |
Taxes |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** RETURN OF SERVICE Executed served on US Attorney General on 6/14/2019 and IRS, Department of Treasury on 5/24/2019, filed by Plaintiff Patricia Howell. (las) |
Filing 4 REASSIGNMENT to Newly Appointed Magistrate Judge. Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells no longer assigned to the case. Case number will now read 2:19-cv00357-CMR. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (jwt) |
Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued as to Internal Revenue Service. (tlh) |
Filing 2 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued as to Department of the Treasury. (tlh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4681086376) (Fee Status: PAID) filed by Patricia Howell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G - Power of Attorney, #8 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.