Quest Solution et al v. Redlpr LLC et al

Plaintiff:	HTS Image Processing, HTS USA and Quest Solution
Defendant:	Redlpr LLC, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Sagy Amit and Riverland Technologies LLC
Case Number:	2:2019cv00437
Filed:	June 24, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge:	Dustin B Pead
Referring Judge:	Clark Waddoups
2 Judge:	Paul M Warner
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Date Filed	Document Text
January 25, 2023	Filing 308 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #306 MOTION for Leave to File Addendum to Motion to Pierce Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
January 12, 2023	Filing 307 Motions No Longer Referred: #306 MOTION for Leave to File Addendum to Motion to Pierce Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by District Court Judge. (tdp)
January 11, 2023	Filing 306 MOTION for Leave to File Addendum to Motion to Pierce Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Amit Declaration and Exhibits, #2 Barker Declaration and Exhibits) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)
November 30, 2022	Filing 304 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to file Sur-Reply is GRANTED #303 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/30/2022.
November 21, 2022	Filing 303 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply (in response to Dkt. 301) and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 ([Proposed] Sur-Reply in response to Dkt. 301), #2 Exhibit 1-A (Declaration), #3 Exhibit 1-B (USPTO filing receipt - US 17/237,044), #4 Exhibit 1-C (Patent specification - US 63/013,523) (redacted), #5 Exhibit 1-D (Patent specification - US 17/237,044) (redacted), #6 Exhibit 1-E (USPTO "first action letter" - US 17/237,044), #7 Exhibit 1-F (Bibliographic Data - US 17/237,044)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
November 14, 2022	Filing 302 NOTICE of Evidentiary Objections (to ECF No. 301) by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #301 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion (Reinitz, Ariel)
November 7, 2022	Filing 301 REPLY to Response to Motion re #298 MOTION to Unseal Case and Memorandum in Support MOTION to Pierce the Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration)(jrj)
November 1, 2022	Filing 300 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #298 MOTION to Unseal Case and Memorandum in Support MOTION to Pierce the Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (declaration - A. Reinitz), #2 Exhibit A-1 (Schedule 14A Proxy Statement), #3 Exhibit A-2 (Annual Report), #4 Exhibit A-3 (USPTO Filing Receipt - US 63/013,523), #5 Exhibit B (declaration - J. Whiteman))(Reinitz, Ariel)
October 24, 2022	Filing 299 Motions No Longer Referred: MOTION to Unseal Case and Pierce the Corporate Veil #298 .
October 18, 2022	Filing 298 MOTION to Unseal Case and Memorandum in Support, MOTION to Pierce the Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 A-Declaration of Sagy Amit in support) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)
July 27, 2022	Filing 297 DOCKET TEXT ORDER terminating #202 Motion to Expedite per 296 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 07/27/2022.
July 27, 2022	Filing 296 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. On March 18, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff's Short Form Discovery Motion #202 ("Motion") subject to certification that Defendants provided all documents responsive to RFP 38 in compliance with the Court's March 10, 2022, Ruling #207 . On March 25, 2022, Defendants filed their certifications [210, 211, 212] and Plaintiff's Motion is now moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 07/27/2022.
July 25, 2022	Filing 295 NOTICE of SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support, #267 Sealed Document,,, #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support, #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and, #290 Sealed Document, #209 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, #174 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Gen. Water Techs. Inc. v. Van Zweden, 2022 UT App 90) (Reinitz, Ariel)
June 30, 2022	Filing 294 Opposition to Dkt. 286 BRIEF re #286 Response (NOT to motion) filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
June 28, 2022	Filing 293 SEALED DOCUMENT re #292 Brief filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Reinitz, Ariel)
June 28, 2022	Filing 292 Response to ECF No. 291 BRIEF filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
June 24, 2022	Filing 291 ORDER VACATING EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND REQUIRING SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION set for 06/28/2022 before Judge Clark Waddoups. See order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 06/24/2022. (kpf)
June 22, 2022	Filing 290 SEALED DOCUMENT re #272 Order, #289 Response (NOT to motion), filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Reinitz, Ariel)
June 22, 2022	Filing 289 Redacted RESPONSE re #272 Order,,(Response to Order to Show Cause) filed by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (declaration), #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Exhibit 1-D, #6 Exhibit 1-E)(Reinitz, Ariel)
June 8, 2022	Filing 288 Plaintiff's RESPONSE re #272 Order filed by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
June 7, 2022	Filing 287 REPLY to Response to Motion re #50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel) Modified on 6/8/2022 to take out unnecessary text (jrj).
June 2, 2022	Filing 286 RESPONSE re #249 Memorandum Decision, filed by Sagy Amit. (jrj)
June 2, 2022	Filing 285 REPLY to Response to Motion re #50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT) filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)
May 27, 2022	Filing 283 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Motion for Summary Judgment held on April 20, 2022 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court Reporter/Transcriber Laura Robinson, RPR, FCRR, CSR, CP, Telephone number (801)328-4800. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. To redact additional information a Motion to Redact must be filed. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 6/17/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/8/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/25/2022. (jrj)
May 26, 2022	Filing 282 EXHIBITS filed by Sagy Amit re #279 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E-Brian Tarbell Declaration Ace Parking, #2 Exhibit F-Amir Borochov Declaration Ohana, #3 Exhibit H1-Hitron Initial contact by AMIT, #4 Exhibit H2-Hitron requestsw LPC cameras for another client, #5 Exhibit H3-Amit reassures Hitron a payment will be made March 2018, #6 Exhibit H4-First request for Dual Head Camera, #7 Exhibit H5-Hitron rendering of Dual head camera sent to Amit and Barker, #8 Exhibit H6-Amit and Hage text messages over the years, #9 Exhibit S0-Levi Silver Email to Plaintiff regarding Reinitz letter, #10 Exhibit S1-Levi Silver Email to Plaintiff regarding Reinitz letter-12192019, #11 Exhibit S2-Notice-Subpeonas Quest RedLPR Ohana and OKYLE)(jrj)
May 26, 2022	Filing 281 EXHIBITS filed by Sagy Amit re #279 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion. Further Exhibits to follow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B2-RE Company Plans, #2 Exhibit B3-RE Chat tomorrow regarding inventory, #3 Exhibit B4-RE ETA UPDATE PO number 3101, #4 Exhibit B5-RE Employee benefits, #5 Exhibit B6-FW Open sales orders-Supply dates 10.4.18, #6 Exhibit B7-RE Employee Benefits, #7 Exhibit Exhibit B8-FW HTS Order...Hialeah PD at Risk, #8 Exhibit B9-RE N70 730nm vs 850nm, #9 Exhibit B10-Amit 1028 Emails and Payments for Trade Shows, #10 Exhibit B11-FW Stevens Institute equipment installation, #11 Exhibit B12-HTS LPI solution at Oklahoma Airport, #12 Exhibit B13-FW O'Donnell Approved, #13 Exhibit B14-GRF LPR, #14 Exhibit B15-Resignation)(jrj)
May 26, 2022	Filing 280 EXHIBITS filed by Sagy Amit re #279 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion. Further exhibits to follow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A1-Amit first email notice of rule 11 violation, #2 Exhibit A2-Amit first email refusing discovery extension, #3 Exhibit A3-Amit first service of 21 days safe harbor, #4 Exhibit A4-Amit requesting depositions and prefiling evidence, #5 Exhibit A5-Amit notifying Reinitz of Bad Faith Settlement use, #6 Exhibit A6-Amit 2nd safe harbor service to all counsel of record, #7 Exhibit A7-Amit 2nd notice of deposition and Reinitz delaying tactics, #8 Exhibit A8-Amit 3rd safe harbor email notifying Reinitz of spoilation of evidence, #9 Exhibit A9-Amit email asking Reinitz to stopy delaying and increasing the costs of bad faith, #10 Exhibit A10-Amit email calling out Reinitz on his abuse of discovery in attempt to increase costs, #11 Exhibit A11-Amit 3rd notice to Reinitz to accept depositions invites, #12 Exhibit A12-Amit email calling out Reinitz on his delays in scheduling depositions, #13 Exhibit A13-Amit email asking Reinitz to produce NDA's, #14 Exhibit A14-Amit email asking Reinitz to produce documents received via subpoena, #15 Exhibit A15-Amit email showing all contracts with plaintiff were signed after defendants resignation, #16 Exhibit A16-Amit email asking for subpeonad documents-3rd request, #17 Exhibit A17-Amit email notifiying Reinitz of his abuse of process and unclean hands, #18 Exhibit A18-Amit 5th email notifying Reinitz of violation of rule 11, #19 Exhibit A19-Reinitz bad faith settlement tactics, #20 Exhibit A10-Amit notifying Reinitz of minimum settlement agreeable by defendants, #21 Exhibit A21-Good faith attempt to settle by defendants, #22 Exhibit A22-Amit 6th email notifying Reinitz of violation of rule 11 and spoilation of evidence, #23 Exhibit A23-Dfts 4th good faith attempt to settle during safe harbor, #24 Exhibit A24-Reinitz objections to produce document received via subpoenas, #25 Exhibit A25-Amit questioning Reinitz on taking deposition on the last day, #26 Exhibit A26-Amit notifying Reinitz of his misconduct throughout litigation, #27 Exhibit A27-Amit notifying Reinitz of perjury during Lustgarten deposition, #28 Exhibit A28-Dfts 5th good faith attempt to settle during safe harbor, #29 Exhibit A29-Amit good faith attempt to peacefully resolve the San Diego action, #30 Exhibit A30-Amit good faith notification of intention to file a RICO claim, #31 Exhibit A31-Dfts 6th good faith attempt to settle before filing RICO claim, #32 Exhibit A32-Reinitz Withdraw as counsel from 3 pending cases on April 21 2022)(jrj)
May 26, 2022	Filing 279 REPLY to Response to Motion re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declaration of Sagy Amit in support of Rule 11 Sanctions, #2 Exhibit B-Declaration of Jeremy Barker in support of Rule 11 Sanctions) Further exhibits will follow.(jrj)
May 26, 2022	Filing 277 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on April 21, 2022 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke, CSR, RPR, RMR, Telephone number 801-521-7238. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. To redact additional information a Motion to Redact must be filed. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 6/16/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/7/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/24/2022. (jrj)
May 25, 2022	Filing 276 APPENDIX to #275 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-E)(Reinitz, Ariel)
May 23, 2022	Filing 275 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Exhibit 1-D, #6 Exhibit 1-F, #7 Exhibit 1-G, #8 Exhibit 1-H, #9 Exhibit 1-I)(Reinitz, Ariel)
May 23, 2022	Filing 272 NOTICE OF HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED ON HTS - REDACTED VERSION FOR RELEASE TO PUBLIC-On or before June 8, 2022, HTS shall inform the court whether it intends to put on evidence at the June 28, 2022 hearing and how many days it needs at the hearing to address the above. See Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 5/23/22. (jrj)
May 17, 2022	Filing 271 Minute Entry Status Conference held on 5/17/2022 for proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Counsel, Mr. Amit, court, and court reporter present by Zoom video conference. Discussion heard on rescheduling the Rule 11 motion hearing, due to delay in preparation of the transcripts. Mr. Ong intends to join the motion on behalf of his clients. Mr. Amit requested a one-week extension to respond to his Rule 11 motion. Court granted the request. Court stayed expert discovery deadline, pending resolution of the Rule 11 motion(s). Set Deadlines/Hearing as to #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support : Replies due by 5/27/2022. Motion Hearing set for 6/28/2022 - 06/29/2022 at 10:00 AM - 04:00 PM [Courtroom TBD] before Judge Clark Waddoups.Court adjourned. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant: Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Kelly Hicken.(Time Start: 11:00, Time End: 11:15, Room Video Conference.)(asb)
May 9, 2022	Filing 270 NOTICE OF HEARING: Status Conference set for 5/17/2022 at 11:00 AM in US District Court-SLCU virtual Court Via Zoom Conference before Judge Clark Waddoups. Video link will be emailed to counsel, the pro se defendant, and the court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others instructed to email utdecf_waddoups@utd.uscourts.gov to obtain video link. (tdp)
May 9, 2022	Filing 269 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The hearing transcript for April 20, 2022 hearing is anticipated to be released tomorrow. The court has been informed, however, that the hearing transcript for the April 21, 2022 hearing will not be available until May 18, 2022. Due to this delay, the court further extends briefing relative to Docket Text Order (ECF No. 245). The following second amended schedule shall apply:1. Plaintiffs shall file an opening brief on or before May 23, 2022;2. Defendants shall file an opposition brief on or before June 2, 2022;3. Plaintiffs shall file a reply brief, if any, on or before June 7, 2022. No attached document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 5/9/2022. (tdp)
May 6, 2022	Filing 268 SEALED DOCUMENT re #116 Sealed Document,, #249 Memorandum Decision,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Reinitz, Ariel)
May 6, 2022	Filing 267 SEALED DOCUMENT re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support, #266 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 261 Order on Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (declaration), #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Exhibit 1-D, #6 Exhibit 1-E, #7 Exhibit 1-F, #8 Exhibit 1-G, #9 Exhibit 1-H, #10 Exhibit 1-I, #11 Exhibit 1-J, #12 Exhibit 1-K, #13 Exhibit 1-L, #14 Exhibit 1-M, #15 Exhibit 1-N, #16 Exhibit 1-O, #17 Exhibit 1-P, #18 Exhibit 1-Q, #19 Exhibit 1-R, #20 Exhibit 1-S, #21 Exhibit 1-T, #22 Exhibit 1-U, #23 Exhibit 1-V)(Reinitz, Ariel)
May 6, 2022	Filing 266 Redacted MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (declaration) (redacted), #2 Exhibit 1-Q, #3 Exhibit 1-R, #4 Exhibit 1-S)(Reinitz, Ariel)
May 4, 2022	Filing 265 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #263 Motion for Extension of Time. For briefing relative to Docket Text Order (ECF No. 245), the following amended schedule shall apply:1. Plaintiffs shall file an opening brief on or before May 13, 2022;2. Defendants shall file an opposition brief on or before May 27, 2022;3. Plaintiffs shall file a reply brief, if any, on or before June 1, 2022. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 5/4/2022. No attached document. (tdp)
May 3, 2022	Filing 264 Motions No Longer Referred: #263 MOTION for Extension of Time briefing schedule set in Dkt. 249 and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)
May 3, 2022	Filing 263 MOTION for Extension of Time briefing schedule set in Dkt. 249 and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (email re: hearing transcript)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
April 29, 2022	Filing 262 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting in part and denying in part #257 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages.1. The court grants Plaintiffs leave to file an overlength opening brief re ECF No. 245. Such brief shall not exceed 40 pages.2. Plaintiffs also may file an overlength brief in opposition to ECF No. 243. Such brief shall not exceed 28 pages. 3. The court denies Plaintiffs leave to file an overlength reply brief re ECF No. 245 because the request is premature. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 04/29/2022. No attached document. (tdp)
April 29, 2022	Filing 261 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #256 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Documents. At this time, the court will allow Plaintiffs to file the specified documents under seal for in camera review due to their alleged privileged nature. After the court's review, it will determine if the documents should be disclosed to the defendants. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/29/2022. No attached document. (tdp)
April 29, 2022	Filing 260 REPLY to Response to Motion re #256 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support , #257 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
April 29, 2022	Filing 259 Motions No Longer Referred: #256 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support , and #257 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and Memorandum in Support. Motions will be handled by district judge. (tdp)
April 29, 2022	Filing 258 RESPONSE to Motion re #256 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support , #257 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)
April 28, 2022	Filing 257 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
April 28, 2022	Filing 256 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
April 25, 2022	Filing 249 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - The court dismisses Counts III and VI to the extent they are based on factual allegations supporting a misappropriation of trade secrets or otherwise confidential information. Additionally, the court directs the following: The Clerks Office shall lodge the exhibits Mr. Amit submitted on April 13, 2022, with an effective date of April 13, 2022; On or before May 6, 2022, Plaintiffs shall supplement the record with the underlying documents on which they rely in their Trade Secret designation #116 and their opposition to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment and Motions to Dismiss; The briefing schedules set forth above supersede prior dates that were set and shall govern the parties briefing. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/25/22. (jrj)
April 21, 2022	Filing 248 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Counsel and parties present. Argument heard on the pending dispostive motions. Briefing on the preemptive copyright issue and Rule 11 motion: Responses due by 5/9/2022, Replies due by 5/16/2022. Motion Hearing set for 6/9/2022 at 10:00 AM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court adjourned.Motion Hearing held on 4/21/2022 re: 49 50 148 166 204 Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant: Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Becky Janke.(Time Start: 10:00, Time End: 4:40, Room 7.300.)(asb)
April 20, 2022	Filing 247 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Counsel and parties present. Argument heard on the pending motions for summary judgment. Court recessed and will reconvene Thursday, 4/21/2022 at 10:00 a.m.Court adjourned. Motion Hearing held on 4/20/2022 re: #49 #50 #148 #166 #204 . Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant: Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson.(Time Start: 10:00, Time End: 4:15, Room 7.300.)(asb)
April 19, 2022	Filing 246 Motions No Longer Referred: Defendant's Motion for Sanctions #243 will be handled by the District Court.
April 18, 2022	Filing 245 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: Having reviewed the pending Motions to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment, and the record, the court concludes it is necessary to re-open the first Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. #49 and #50 ) and the April 28, 2021 Memorandum Decision (ECF No. #112 ) as to the Non-Trade Secret Claims. On the second day of the hearing (April 21, 2022), the court requests that the parties be prepared to address the following issues:1.To the extent Counts III through VII are not based on trade secret misappropriation, is there evidence creating material issues of fact as to these claims? If so, what is such evidence?2.To the extent Counts III through VII are not based on trade secret misappropriation, are any of them barred by copyright preemption law?3.To the extent Counts III through VII are not based on trade secret misappropriation, are any of them barred by the first to breach rule or economic loss rule? Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/18/2022. No attached document. (tdp)
April 18, 2022	Filing 244 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: #240 Motion to Lodge HTS Purchase Agreement is GRANTED. The [240-1] agreement shall be considered part of the record. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/18/2022. No attached document. (tdp)
April 18, 2022	Filing 243 MOTION for Rule 11 Sanctions and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Recommendations, #2 Exhibit A1-Amit vs. HTS, #3 Exhibit A2-Employment Docs, #4 Exhibit A3-Neev-Niv-Nissenson Signature, #5 Exhibit A4-HTS-Barker Employment, #6 Exhibit A5-Amit and Mayer at BOMA, #7 Exhibit A6-Teamtronics acquires HTS for 4 million, #8 Exhibit A7-Quest HTS Ltr Precision Bell 10-18-2019, #9 Exhibit B-Haim Nissenson Subpoena and HTS V Amit complaint, #10 Exhibit B1-Nissenson v RADA, #11 Exhibit B2-9-30-21-Niv Guy Nissensoh SEC, #12 Exhibit B3-Swiftnet V. MG Telecom, #13 Exhibit B4-Verizon UK Ltd v Swiftnet Ltd, #14 Exhibit B5-NTS Comm vs. State of Texas Franchise Tax, #15 Exhibit B6-Tax Withholding Lien-Niv Nessenson, #16 Exhibit B7-Anney PIV Nissenson Family, #17 Exhibit B8-Nissenson Niv Neev signatures, #18 Exhibit B9-Big Game vast crypto scam) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)
April 15, 2022	Filing 242 SEALED DOCUMENT re 229 Order,,,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Reinitz, Ariel)
April 15, 2022	Filing 241 EXHIBITS filed by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re 229 Order,,,,, #209 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Reinitz, Ariel)
April 15, 2022	Filing 240 MOTION to Lodge HTS Purchase Agreement and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 TA-Quest-HTS Acquisition Agreement) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)
April 14, 2022	Filing 239 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTIONS re: #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support, #204 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support , #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant) Motions Hearing set for 4/20/2022 at 10:00 AM in Rm 7.300 before Judge Clark Waddoups. ***Note: The hearing on the pending motions is not an evidentiary hearing. Instead, the parties may only present oral argument on the motions. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah (tdp)
April 14, 2022	Filing 238 NOTICE VACATING EVIDENTIARY HEARING set for 04/20/2022 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge Waddoups. Part 1 of the hearing scheduled for April 20, 2022 is VACATED. Once the court issues a ruling on the #148 and #204 Motions to Dismiss and the #166 Second Motion for Summary Judgment, if a party concludes the court should hear the motion to unseal documents, the court will set a new date for the evidentiary hearing. (tdp)
April 14, 2022	Filing 237 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Status Conference held on 4/14/2022. Counsel present by Zoom video conference. Court informed counsel that the evidentiary hearing on the sealed documents will not be conducted on April 20-21, 2022. Counsel to be prepared for oral argument on the pending motion for summary judgment and motion to dismiss on April 20-21, 2022. Court adjourned. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Attorney for Defendant: Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson.(Time Start: 3:00, Time End: 3:10, Room Video Conference.)(asb)
April 13, 2022	Filing 236 Proposed Exhibit & Witness List for hearings to be held 4/20/2022 and 4/21/2022 by Sagy Amit. (asb) .
April 13, 2022	Filing 235 Witness and Exhibit List, filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)
April 13, 2022	Filing 234 NOTICE of listing of exhibits Plaintiffs may offer at Apr. 20, 2022 evidentiary hearing by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #218 Order on Motion for ADR, (Reinitz, Ariel)
April 12, 2022	Filing 233 RESPONSE re #232 Notice (Other)/Plaintiff Objection, filed by Sagy Amit. (jrj)
April 12, 2022	Filing 232 NOTICE of Plaintiffs' objections to the voluntary appearance of witnesses at April 20, 2022 evidentiary hearing by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #223 Witness List(Proposed), #218 Order on Motion for ADR, (Reinitz, Ariel)
April 12, 2022	Filing 231 SEALED DOCUMENT re 229 Order, filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)
April 12, 2022	Filing 230 NOTICE of Docket from Mississippi(61CI1:20-cv-00218-JM) filed by Sagy Amit per Order 229 . (jrj)
April 12, 2022	NOTICE OF HEARING (to add courtroom number): Evidentiary Hearing set for 4/20/2022 - 4/21/2022 at 10:00 AM in Rm 7.300 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Motions Hearing re: #204 MOTION to Dismiss; , #148 MOTION to Dismiss; #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment set for 4/20/2022 - 4/21/2022 at 10:00 AM in Rm 7.300 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Courtroom 7.300, Salt Lake City, Utah. (asb)
April 11, 2022	Filing 229 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The court has concluded the following items are needed in connection with Part 2 of the April 20, 2022 hearing:1. Plaintiffs shall provide a copy of the Settlement Agreement and any releases reached between them and Riverland Technologies, LLC in Mississippi Case No. 61CI1:20-cv-218-JE. The document shall be filed under seal without service on the defendants in this matter, and will be reviewed by the court in camera.2. REDLPR, LLC shall provide a copy of the docket list in Mississippi Case No. 61CI1:20-cv-218-JE. Only the docket list, and not the documents themselves, need to be provided.3. Mr. Amit shall provide a copy of the Settlement Agreement and any releases reached between him and the Plaintiffs in California Case No. 37-2018-00044543-CU-BC-CTL. Mr. Amit shall file the document under seal.4. In Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs attached Exhibit 1-K. The Exhibit references three attachments. Plaintiffs shall provide a copy of those three attachments.The requested items shall be filed on the docket, in accordance with the above instructions, on or before April 15, 2022. No attached document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/11/2022. (tdp)
April 11, 2022	Filing 228 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The court grants #226 Motion Requesting In-Person Hearing.The April 20, 2022 hearing has two parts. Part 1 is an evidentiary hearing on whether certain documents, designated in the record as Confidential, should remain under seal. The determination about whether a document is Confidential is different from the determination about whether a document is a trade secret. The evidentiary hearing will focus only on whether the designated documents should remain under seal as Confidential.Part 2 is oral argument on the Motion to Dismiss (ECF Nos. #148 and #204 ) and the Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. #166 ). See Order, at Paragraph 8 (ECF No. #199 ).If two days are needed for the hearing, the parties should be prepared to continue the hearing through April 21, 2022. The court will notify the parties shortly about the courtroom number in which the hearing will be held. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/11/2022. No attached document. (tdp)
April 11, 2022	Filing 227 Motions No Longer Referred: Defendants' Motion Requesting In Person Hearing #226 will be addressed by the District Court.
April 9, 2022	Filing 226 First MOTION Requesting In-Person Hearing filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Ong, Jacob)
April 9, 2022	Filing 225 First REPLY to Response to Motion re #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of Exhibits, #2 Affidavit 7 of Barker, #3 Affidavit 9 of Ong, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 10a, #6 Exhibit 11)(Ong, Jacob)
April 8, 2022	Filing 224 NOTICE of witnesses Plaintiffs will or may call at Apr. 20, 2022 Evidentiary Hearing by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #218 Order on Motion for ADR, (Reinitz, Ariel)
April 8, 2022	Filing 223 Proposed Witness List for April 20th Evidentiary Hearing by Sagy Amit. (jrj)
April 8, 2022	Filing 222 NOTICE of Mediator Selection and Mediation Date by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #218 Order on Motion for ADR, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Reinitz, Ariel)
April 4, 2022	Filing 220 DEPOSITION(s) of Various-See Attachments/Submission taken on Various dates-See Attachments/Submission. filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Barker,Jeremy-011822, #2 Exhibit 2-2-Whiteman,John-021022, #3 Exhibit 3-Hofman,Yoram-022222, #4 Exhibit 4-Lustgarten,Shai-022322)(jrj)
April 1, 2022	Filing 219 DEPOSITION of S. Amit, J. Barker, RedLPR (30(b)(6) by Mr. Barker) taken on March 7-9, 2022 filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Amit deposition transcript), #2 Exhibit B1 (Barker deposition transcript, pt. 1), #3 Exhibit B2 (Barker deposition transcript, pt. 2), #4 Exhibit C (RedLPR 30(b)(6) deposition transcript) (by Mr. Barker))(Reinitz, Ariel)
April 1, 2022	Filing 218 ORDER granting #206 Motion for ADR - Mediation. Plaintiffs shall file on the docket the full transcripts for the depositions of Sagy Amit, Jeremy Barker, and the 30(b)(6) deposition of REDLPR, LLC by 6:00 p.m. today. Plaintiffs shall simultaneously provide a copy to the defendants. See Order for other details and deadlines. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/1/22. (jrj)
March 30, 2022	Filing 217 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: #206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support: Motion Hearing set for 4/1/2022 at 11:00 AM in US District Court-SLCU virtual Court Via Zoom Conference before Judge Clark Waddoups. Video link will be emailed to counsel, the pro se defendant, and the court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others instructed to email utdecf_waddoups@utd.uscourts.gov to obtain video link. (tdp)
March 28, 2022	Filing 216 APPENDIX to #209 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution (Appendix of Evidence). (Reinitz, Ariel)
March 28, 2022	Filing 215 First RESPONSE to Motion re #206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Ong, Jacob)
March 28, 2022	Filing 214 Plaintiff's REPLY to Response to Motion re #206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support (confirming Plaintiffs' agreement with Mr. Amit's stipulations in Dkt. 213) filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
March 28, 2022	Filing 213 RESPONSE to Motion re #206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)
March 25, 2022	Filing 212 Third RESPONSE to Motion re #202 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: sanctions MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support Certification filed by Defendant Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, email chain in support of Exhibt B, #2 Exhibit B, PowerPoint to TIBA, #3 Exhibit C, email chain in support of Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit D, PowerPoint to LAZ)(Ong, Jacob)
March 25, 2022	Filing 211 Second RESPONSE to Motion re #202 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: sanctions MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Jeremy James MC Michael Barker. (Ong, Jacob)
March 25, 2022	Filing 210 Dft Amit Statement and Certification Regarding RFP 38 and court order 207. Response re #207 Order filed by Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(kpf)
March 24, 2022	Filing 209 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Exhibit 1-D, #6 Exhibit 1-E, #7 Exhibit 1-F, #8 Exhibit 1-G, #9 Exhibit 1-H, #10 Exhibit 1-I, #11 Exhibit 1-J, #12 Exhibit 1-K, #13 Exhibit 1-L, #14 Exhibit 1-M, #15 Exhibit 1-N, #16 Exhibit 1-O, #17 Exhibit 1-P, #18 Exhibit 1-Q, #19 Exhibit 1-R, #20 Exhibit 1-S, #21 Exhibit 1-T, #22 Exhibit 1-U)(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 24, 2022	Filing 208 Motions No Longer Referred: #206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)
March 23, 2022	Filing 207 ORDER re: Plaintiffs short form discovery motion seeking sanctions. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 3/23/22. (jrj)
March 22, 2022	Filing 206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 22, 2022	Filing 205 REPLY to Response to Motion re #202 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: sanctions MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (email), #2 Exhibit B (correspondence between counsel))(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 19, 2022	Filing 204 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit A, #2 Affidavit B)(Ong, Jacob)
March 19, 2022	Filing 203 First RESPONSE to Motion re #202 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: sanctions MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (email), #2 Exhibit B (email), #3 Exhibit C (email))(Ong, Jacob)
March 18, 2022	Filing 202 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: sanctions , MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (deposition transcript excerpts acknowledging discovery deficiencies)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 11, 2022	Filing 201 NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of flash drive filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. The flash drive was not entered on the docket due to (size, file type, CD, DVD, etc) and will be retained in a case file folder in the Clerk's Office while the case is active, and according to the retention schedule set forth by the Judicial Conference thereafter. THE FLASH DRIVE IS SEALED. (jrj)
March 11, 2022	Filing 199 ORDER - This matter is before the court on several issues that have arisen in this case. Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment #192 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The court grants an extension, but Plaintiffs shall have only until March 24, 2022 to file their opposition brief to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs' Motion for Amended Scheduling Order #195 is DENIED. On February 14, 2022, Mr. Amit filed a Notice of Documentation of Costs #175 . The court has reviewed the document and concludes the costs are reasonable. Plaintiffs shall reimburse Mr. Amit $250 on or before March 31, 2022. The court reiterates that documents previously designated as confidential by the court, see Memorandum Decision, at 12 #112 , shall retain that status unless the court orders otherwise. Court Reporter required Y. Interpreter required N. Is this an In-person Hearing Y. The court sets an in-person Evidentiary Hearing for April 20, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. to address whether some or all of the sealed documents in this case should be unsealed. ( Evidentiary Hearing set for 4/20/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Clark Waddoups.) At the April 20, 2022 in-person hearing, the court will also hear oral argument on the Motion to Dismiss #148 and Second Motion for Summary Judgment #166 . The court will enter a separate notice once it determines in which courtroom the Evidentiary Hearing and Hearing on Motions will be held. If a second day is needed to complete oral argument, the parties should be prepared to continue the hearing through April 21, 2022. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 3/11/22. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah(jrj)
March 10, 2022	Filing 198 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Counsel, pro-se party, court, and court reporter present by Zoom video conference. Argument heard on the plaintiffs' motion to amend the scheduling order to take additional 30(b)(6) depositions. Court denied the motion. Briefing on the MSJ: Responses due 3/24/2022; Reply due 4/1/2022. Oral argument and evidentiary hearing set for 4/20/2022 at 10:00 a.m., in-person (courtroom TBD). Court will issue a written order with the ruling and dates.Court adjourned. granting #192 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and, #192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and and Memorandum in Support , #195 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support , #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support ( Replies due by 4/1/2022., Responses due by 3/24/2022); denying #195 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order ; Motion Hearing held on 3/10/2022 re #192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and and Memorandum in Support filed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, #195 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA ; Status Conference held on 3/10/2022; Set Deadlines/Hearing as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and, #192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and and Memorandum in Support , #195 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support , #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support :( Replies due by 4/1/2022., Responses due by 3/24/2022, Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2022 at 10:00 AM in Rm 1.100 (Clerk's Office) before Judge Clark Waddoups.). Written Order to follow oral order: Yes. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson.(Time Start: 9:30, Time End: 10:10, Room Video Conference.) (asb)
March 10, 2022	Filing 197 Motions No Longer Referred: #195 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)
March 10, 2022	Filing 196 ORDER granting #190 Motion for Short Term Discovery; terminating #190 Motion to Expedite. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, RedLPR, LLC shall produce to Plaintiffs all documents and communications responsive to RFP 38. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 3/10/22. (jrj)
March 9, 2022	Filing 195 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 8, 2022	Filing 194 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: #192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 3/10/2022 at 09:30 AM in US District Court-SLCU virtual Court Via Zoom Conference before Judge Clark Waddoups. This hearing will be combined with the Status and Scheduling Conference previously noticed for the same date and time. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah (tdp)
March 8, 2022	Filing 193 Motions No Longer Referred: #192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion will be handled by District Court Judge. (tdp)
March 8, 2022	Filing 192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 3, 2022	Filing 191 First RESPONSE to Motion re #190 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents / communications responsive to RFP 38 MOTION to Expedite Motion to Compel and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Ong, Jacob)
February 22, 2022	Filing 190 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents / communications responsive to RFP 38 , MOTION to Expedite Motion to Compel and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 19, 2022	Filing 189 NOTICE OF HEARING: Status and Scheduling Conference set for 3/10/2022 at 09:30 AM in US District Court-SLCU virtual Court Via Zoom Conference before Judge Clark Waddoups.Several issues have arisen about sealed documents and how the court's system works relative to sealed documents. The Status Conference is to address the procedural aspects of redacted and sealed documents.Per #112 Memorandum Decision and Order, certain documents have been deemed confidential by the court. Those documents are sealed and must continue to be treated as such in all filings as long as the court's order remains in place. Additional arguments have been raised, however, about whether some of those documents should continue under seal. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is to set a date for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether the documents satisfy the requirements to continue under seal.A video link will be emailed to counsel, the pro se defendant, and the court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others are instructed to email utdecf_waddoups@utd.uscourtgs.gove to obtain video link.Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah (tdp)
February 19, 2022	Filing 188 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #184 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 2/19/2022. No attached document. (tdp)
February 19, 2022	Filing 187 DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice 181 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 2/19/2022. No attached document. (tdp)
February 19, 2022	Filing 186 Motions No Longer Referred: #184 Redacted MOTION to Seal Document and Memorandum in Support (seeking limited redactions to Dkt. Nos. 181, 181-5), and 181 MOTION to Compel Deposition of Counsel and Memorandum in Support. The motions will be handled by district judge. (tdp)
February 19, 2022	Filing 185 NOTICE VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for 07/13/2022 before Judge Waddoups. The court vacated the hearing on 2/15/2022. See Notice (ECF No. 180). Although the latest #182 Scheduling Order references the hearing, this notice clarifies that the hearing remains vacated due to the pending dispositive motions. (tdp)
February 18, 2022	Filing 184 Redacted MOTION to Seal Document and Memorandum in Support (seeking limited redactions to Dkt. Nos. 181, 181-5) filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Amit Motion - Dkt.181) (redacted), #2 Exhibit B (Ex. 1 to Amit Motion - Dkt. 181-1) (unredacted), #3 Exhibit C (Ex. 2 to Amit Motion - Dkt. 181-2) (unredacted), #4 Exhibit D (Ex. 3 to Amit Motion - Dkt. 181-3) (unredacted), #5 Exhibit E (Ex. 4 to Amit Motion - Dkt. 181-4) (unredacted), #6 Exhibit F (Ex. 5 to Amit Motion - Dkt. 181-5) (redacted), #7 Exhibit G (emails), #8 Exhibit H (emails)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 17, 2022	Filing 183 REPLY to Response to Motion re #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Sealed, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3-Sealed, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(jrj) Modified on 2/18/2022-two exhibits made Sealed per call from Counsel.(jrj).
February 17, 2022	Filing 182 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 1/8/2021. Expert Discovery due by 6/9/2022. Motions due by 7/8/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 07/13/22. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/17/22. (jrj)
February 15, 2022	Filing 180 NOTICE VACATING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for 5/12/2022 before Judge Waddoups. The #145 Amended Scheduling Order changed the hearing date to 7/13/2022. The purpose of the hearing is to set a trial date. After the hearing was scheduled, the defendants filed dispositive motions. Those motions must be decided before it is known whether a trial is necessary. Accordingly, the court also VACATES the Status and Scheduling Conference set for 7/13/2022 before Judge Waddoups. (tdp)
February 15, 2022	Filing 179 ORDER WITHDRAWING REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg for a Settlement Conference. The referral is withdrawn for the reasons stated in the Docket Text Order (ECF No. 176) issued by Judge Oberg on February 14, 2022. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 2/15/2022. (tdp)
February 15, 2022	Filing 178 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #172 MOTION to Compel Deposition of Counsel and Memorandum in Support. The document was filed incorrectly. The clerk requests the filer of the original document to refile the pleading. The new pleading will receive a new document number on the docket. These need to be filed separately so they may be properly briefed pursuant to Rule DUCivR 7-1(a)(3). (jrj)
February 14, 2022	Filing 177 APPENDIX to #174 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution (Appendix of Evidence). (Reinitz, Ariel)
February 14, 2022	Filing 176 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The order referring this case for a settlement conference directed the parties to contact Magistrate Judge Oberg on or before February 3, 2022 to schedule the conference, (Doc. No. 157), but the parties did not do so. On February 7, 2022, the parties were ordered to email Judge Oberg's chambers by February 11, 2022, indicating whether they wished to proceed with the settlement conference and, if so, providing the earliest date they would be ready to proceed. The order stated: "If the parties fail to do so, Judge Oberg will request that the district judge terminate the referral." (Doc. No. 165.) Thereafter, Mr. Amit emailed Judge Oberg's chambers indicating he did not wish to proceed with the conference. No other party contacted Judge Oberg's chambers. Because no parties have indicated they wish to proceed at this point, Judge Oberg requests that the district judge terminate the settlement referral. No attached document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 2/14/2022. (med)
February 14, 2022	Filing 175 NOTICE of Documentation of Costs by Sagy Amit re #164 Order. (jrj)
February 11, 2022	Filing 174 Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (declaration), #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Exhibit A-4, #6 Exhibit A-5, #7 Exhibit A-6, #8 Exhibit A-7, #9 Exhibit A-8, #10 Exhibit A-9, #11 Exhibit A-10, #12 Exhibit A-11, #13 Exhibit A-12, #14 Exhibit A-13, #15 Exhibit B (declaration), #16 Exhibit B-1, #17 Exhibit B-2, #18 Exhibit B-3, #19 Exhibit B-4, #20 Exhibit B-5, #21 Exhibit B-6, #22 Exhibit B-7, #23 Exhibit B-8, #24 Exhibit B-9, #25 Exhibit B-10, #26 Exhibit B-11, #27 Exhibit B-12, #28 Exhibit B-13, #29 Exhibit B-14, #30 Exhibit B-15, #31 Exhibit B-16, #32 Exhibit C (declaration), #33 Exhibit C-1, #34 Exhibit C-2, #35 Exhibit C-3)(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 10, 2022	Filing 173 REPLY to Response to Motion re #172 MOTION to Compel Deposition of Counsel and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (declaration), #2 Exhibit 1-A (email), #3 Exhibit 1-B (document production))(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 10, 2022	Filing 172 Response to #170 and MOTION to Compel Deposition of Counsel and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)
February 10, 2022	Filing 171 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting Defendants' Motion #169 to Seal Document 27 of Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 02/10/2022.
February 9, 2022	Filing 170 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit B (emails re: discovery), #3 Exhibit C (emails re: discovery), #4 Exhibit D (emails re: discovery)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 9, 2022	Filing 169 MOTION to Seal Document #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Ong, Jacob)
February 8, 2022	Filing 167 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Electronic Motion Hearing held on 12/14/2021 before Judge Dustin B. Pead. Court Reporter/Transcriber Ed Young, Telephone number (801) 328-3202. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. To redact additional information a Motion to Redact must be filed. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 3/1/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/22/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/9/2022. (alf)
February 8, 2022	Filing 166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Appendix of Evidence, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit A01, #7 Exhibit A02, #8 Exhibit A03, #9 Exhibit A04, #10 Exhibit A05, #11 Exhibit A06, #12 Exhibit A07, #13 Exhibit A08, #14 Exhibit A09, #15 Exhibit A10, #16 Exhibit A11, #17 Exhibit A12, #18 Exhibit A13, #19 Exhibit A14, #20 Exhibit A15, #21 Exhibit A16, #22 Exhibit A17, #23 Exhibit A18, #24 Exhibit A19, #25 Exhibit A20, #26 Exhibit A21, #27 Exhibit A22 - Sealed, #28 Exhibit A23, #29 Exhibit A24, #30 Exhibit A25, #31 Exhibit A26, #32 Exhibit A27, #33 Exhibit A28, #34 Exhibit A29, #35 Exhibit A30, #36 Exhibit A31, #37 Exhibit A32, #38 Exhibit A33, #39 Exhibit A34, #40 Exhibit A35, #41 Exhibit A36, #42 Exhibit A37, #43 Exhibit A38, #44 Exhibit A39, #45 Exhibit A40, #46 Exhibit A41, #47 Exhibit A42, #48 Exhibit A43, #49 Exhibit A44, #50 Exhibit A45, #51 Exhibit A46, #52 Exhibit A47, #53 Exhibit A48, #54 Exhibit A49, #55 Exhibit A50, #56 Exhibit A51, #57 Exhibit A52, #58 Exhibit A53, #59 Exhibit A54, #60 Exhibit B01, #61 Exhibit B02, #62 Exhibit B03, #63 Exhibit B04, #64 Exhibit B05, #65 Exhibit B06, #66 Exhibit B07)(Ong, Jacob) Modified to seal exhibit per counsel on 2/9/2022 (kpf).
February 7, 2022	Filing 165 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The order referring this case for a settlement conference directed the parties to contact Magistrate Judge Oberg on or before February 3, 2022 to schedule the conference. (Doc. No. 157.) Although Judge Waddoups indicated an intent to defer the conference until summary judgment and Rule 11 motions and responses are filed, the referral, including the February 3 scheduling deadline, remained in place. That deadline has passed and the parties have not contacted Magistrate Judge Oberg, nor have they responded to the January 20, 2022 email from Judge Oberg's chambers regarding scheduling. No later than February 11, 2022, the parties must email Judge Oberg's chambers at utdecf_oberg@utd.uscourts.gov indicating whether they wish to proceed with the settlement conference and, if so, providing the earliest date they will be ready to proceed. If the parties fail to do so, Judge Oberg will request that the district judge terminate the referral. No attached document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 2/7/2022. (med)
January 28, 2022	Filing 164 ORDER IMPOSING COSTS AND SETTING SCHEDULE: Plaintiffs shall reimburse Mr. Amit for all costs associated with cancellation of the scheduled depositions. Mr. Amit shall show proof of such costs on or before 2/18/22022. Plaintiff's shall cooperate full in rescheduling the depositions so they may be taken on or before 2/25/2022. The deadline for filing Plaintiff's response to Motion to Dismiss is extended to 2/11/2022. The court reinstates all deadlines set forth in the Amended Scheduling Order no. #145 . Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 01/27/2022. (kpf)
January 25, 2022	Filing 163 Minute Order. Proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Counsel, parties, court, and court reporter present by Zoom video conference. Mr. Amit requested to continue without a stay. Discussion heard. Mr. Amit also stated that he does not believe that plaintiff is attempting to settle in good faith. Court urged Mr. Amit to take into consideration to go forward with settlement conference before Judge Oberg. However, the court is not requiring any party to participate. Mr. Ong stated that he is preparing a motion for summary judgment for his clients and that settlement discussions would not be productive prior to filing the motion and responses are filed. He anticipates filing by end of this week. Mr. Amit intends to file a Rule 11 motion for sanctions for bad faith. Court lifted the stay. Order for settlement conference will remain in place, but will request that the conference be deferred until after the motions and responses are filed. Discussion heard on arranging depositions. Mr. Amit has been requesting Mr. Reintiz to produce witnesses. All requests re: depositions disputes to be handled by Judge Pead.Court adjourned.granting #158 Motion Lift Stay; Motion Hearing held on 1/25/2022 re #158 MOTION for Relief from Court order no. 157 filed by Sagy Amit Written Order to follow oral order: No. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson.(Time Start: 2:30, Time End: 2:45, Room Video Conference.) (asb)
January 25, 2022	Filing 162 SEALED DOCUMENTSealed Exhibits re #161 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1B)(jrj)
January 24, 2022	Filing 161 Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #158 MOTION for Relief from Court order no. 157 filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (declaration) (other exhibits provided to Chambers via email))(Reinitz, Ariel)
January 22, 2022	Filing 160 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: #158 MOTION for Relief from Court order no. 157 . Motion Hearing set for 1/25/2022 at 02:30 PM in US District Court-SLC,UT virtual Court Via Zoom Conference before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court Reporter required - Y. Interpreter required - N. Is this an In-person Hearing - N.Parties should be prepared to address the communications that have occurred relating to a settlement conference and representations made to the court about the same.A video link will be emailed to counsel, the pro se defendant, and the court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others are instructed to email utdecf_waddoups@utd.uscourts.gov to obtain the video link. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah (tdp)
January 22, 2022	Filing 159 Motions No Longer Referred: #158 MOTION for Relief from Court order no. 157 . Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)
January 21, 2022	Filing 158 Prose MOTION for Relief from Court order no. 157 under rule 60(b)(3) filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(kpf)
January 19, 2022	Filing 157 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg under 28:636 (b)(1) for a Settlement Conference. Counsel shall, on or before 02/03/2022, jointly contact the Magistrate to schedule the Settlement Conference. The court further ORDERS that all deadlines and discovery are STAYED pending the outcome of the Settlement Conference. If settlement is not reached, new deadlines will be set. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 01/19/2022. No attached document.(tdp)
January 19, 2022	Filing 156 DOCKET TEXT ORDER GRANTING #155 Motion to Refer Case for Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 01/19/2022. No attached document. (tdp)
January 14, 2022	Filing 155 Joint MOTION for Settlement (seeking referral for court sponsored settlement conference per Dkt. 146) filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
January 13, 2022	Filing 154 REPLY to Response to Motion re #151 MOTION to Unseal Document #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Sagy Amit and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)
January 13, 2022	Filing 153 Motions No Longer Referred: #151 MOTION to Unseal Document, filed by Sagy Amit. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)
January 10, 2022	Filing 152 Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #151 MOTION to Unseal Document #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Sagy Amit and Memorandum in Support (opposition to Dkt. 151) filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
January 6, 2022	Filing 151 MOTION to Unseal Documents #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Sagy Amit and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)
January 6, 2022	Filing 150 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Pursuant to local rule DUCivR 5-3(b), Plaintiffs' Motion to Maintain Seal is GRANTED (ECF No. 149). Docket Numbers 148-1, 148-2 and 148-3 (the "Confidential Exhibits"), as attached to Defendant Sagy Amit's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 148), shall remain under seal as required by the Court's earlier Order (EF No. 112 at 12). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 01/06/2022.
January 5, 2022	Filing 149 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
January 4, 2022	Filing 148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Roadmap2018_V12, #2 Summary SLC meeting 2017, #3 Competitiors)(jrj) Modified on 1/4/2022 exhibits previously filed under seal see order #112 (nl).
December 20, 2021	Filing 147 AMENDED MINUTE ORDER: As set forth on the record at the hearing held on December 14, 2021, Mr. Amit's Short Form Discovery Motion RE: Request for Production 138 is denied without prejudice[See Motion at 142, not 141]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 12/20/2021. No attached document.
December 14, 2021	Filing 146 Minute Order. Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead: Motion Hearing held on 12/14/2021 re #142 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA and #132 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA. Minute Entry & Ruling for December 14, 2021 remote oral argument. Attorney Ariel Reinitz appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs, attorney Jacob Ong appeared on behalf of Defendants RedLPR and Jeremy Barker and Defendant Sagy Amit appeared pro se. Following argument, the Court ruled as follows: 1. Based on the certification of Defendants, as stated on the record, Plaintiffs Short Form Discovery Motion RE: Request for Production 56 is moot #132 ;2. Mr. Amits Short-Form Discovery Motion RE: Request for Production 138 is denied without prejudice #142 . Before December 21, 2021, the parties are ordered to engage in a meet and confer regarding Mr. Amits discovery motion. If after the meet and confer the discovery issue remains unresolved, no later than January 14, 2022, Mr. Amit shall file his full-length discovery motion. Plaintiffs opposition to the motion is due no later than January 26, 2022, and Mr. Amits reply is due no later than February 9, 2022. See, DUCivR 7-1;3. For good cause, Plaintiffs Motion for Amended Scheduling Order is granted #142 . The Court will place the Amended Scheduling Order on the docket; and 4. Within the next thirty days, the parties shall meet and confer to determine if they are interested in referral for purposes of a court sponsored settlement conference. If the parties agree, they shall file a motion requesting that the District Court to refer the matter for settlement.Ruling set forth in detail on the record, no written ruling to follow. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Attorney for Defendant Jacob Ong for RedLPR and Jeremy Barker; Defendant Sagy Amit appearing pro se. Court Reporter: Electronic/Zoom. (tls)
December 14, 2021	Filing 145 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER granting #142 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 1/8/2021. Expert Discovery due by 6/9/2022. Motions due by 7/8/2022. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 12/14/21. (jrj)
December 13, 2021	Filing 144 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #141 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents responsive to Defendants RFP No. 138. filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (correspondence re: discovery))(Reinitz, Ariel)
December 10, 2021	Filing 143 NOTICE OF REMOTE ZOOM HEARING: Discovery Hearing set for 12/14/2021 at 1:30 p.m. on Plaintiffs' Short-Form Discovery Motion Re: Request for Production 56 #132 and Defendant Amit's Short- Form Discovery Motion Re: Request for Production 138 #141 . The hearing will be conducted remotely and instructions on appearing via Zoom will be emailed to the parties.
December 9, 2021	Filing 142 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
December 7, 2021	Filing 141 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents responsive to Defendants RFP No. 138 filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)
December 3, 2021	Filing 140 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Sagy Amit. (jrj)
December 2, 2021	Filing 139 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Jacob C. Ong (not representing Sagy Amit but submitting the form for him as a courtesy) (Ong, Jacob)
December 1, 2021	Filing 138 REQUEST for Removal from Case Service List filed by Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC. (Burt, Bruce)
December 1, 2021	Filing 137 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob C. Ong on behalf of Jeremy James MC Michael Barker (Ong, Jacob)
December 1, 2021	Filing 136 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob C. Ong on behalf of Redlpr LLC (Ong, Jacob)
November 12, 2021	Filing 135 ORDER granting #133 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. Attorney Levi Y. Silver and Nathan D. Thomas withdrawn from case for Redlpr LLC, Sagy Amit, and Jeremy James McMichael Barker. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/12/2021. (jl)
November 9, 2021	Filing 134 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #132 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Silver, Levi)
November 9, 2021	Filing 133 MOTION to Withdraw filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent of REDLPR, #2 Exhibit B - Consent of Sagy Amit, #3 Exhibit C - Consent of Jeremy McMichael Barker, #4 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Thomas, Nathan) Modified by correcting event on 11/12/2021 (jl).
November 2, 2021	Filing 132 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-A (RFP 56 to RedLPR), #2 Exhibit 1-B (RFP 56 to Amit), #3 Exhibit 1-C (RFP 56 to Barker), #4 Exhibit 2-A (RedLPR objections), #5 Exhibit 2-B (Amit objections), #6 Exhibit 2-C (Barker objections), #7 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
October 8, 2021	Filing 131 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SHORT FORM DISCOVERY MOTION - denying #127 Motion to Expedite. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/8/21. (jrj)
October 5, 2021	Filing 130 RESPONSE to Motion re #127 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Silver, Levi)
September 30, 2021	Filing 129 ORDER granting Stipulated #128 Motion Setting Briefing Schedule. RED Defendants' deadline to file an Opposition to Plaintiffs' Short Form Discovery Motion #127 is October 5, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 9/30/21. (jrj)
September 30, 2021	Filing 128 Stipulated MOTION Briefing Schedule re #127 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Silver, Levi)
September 24, 2021	Filing 127 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (RFP 19 to RedLPR), #2 Exhibit 2 (RFP 18 to Amit), #3 Exhibit 3 (RFP 18 to Barker), #4 Exhibit 4 (correspondence re: proposed request), #5 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
September 10, 2021	Filing 126 NOTICE OF HEARING: Status Report and Scheduling Conference set for 5/12/2022 at 02:45 PM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. (asb)
August 9, 2021	Filing 125 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER - granting #124 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 1/8/2021. Expert Discovery due by 4/6/2022. Motions due by 5/6/2022. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 8/9/21. (jrj)
August 8, 2021	Filing 124 Stipulated MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
June 21, 2021	Filing 123 RULING & ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' SHORT FORM DISCOVERY MOTION - ORDER denying #119 Motion to Expedite. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED as MOOT as the emails that are the subject of the Motion have now been produced. Further, in light of the competing narratives and the absence of corroborative documentation memorializing the content of the parties' meet and confer communications, the Court denies Plaintiffs' request for an award of attorney fees and expenses incurred in making the Motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 6/21/21. (jrj)
June 17, 2021	Filing 122 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #119 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Silver, Levi)
June 16, 2021	Filing 121 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT RIVERLANDTECHNOLOGIES LLC - denying as moot #44 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ; granting #120 Motion to Dismiss Party. Riverland Technologies LLC terminated. The hearing scheduled for Thursday, June 24, 2021 at 9:30 AM is terminated as MOOT. HTS' claims against Riverland are hereby dismissed without prejudice, HTS and Riverland to each bear their own costs. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 6/16/21. (jrj)
June 15, 2021	Filing 120 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss Party Riverland Technologies LLC and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Dismissing Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC)(Bronson, Glenn)
June 10, 2021	Filing 119 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (RFPs to Barker), #2 Exhibit B (Defendants' Initial Disclosures), #3 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
June 1, 2021	Filing 118 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Scheduling Conference held on 6/1/2021.Counsel, court, and court reporter present by Zoom video conference. Discussion heard on scheduled the motion to dismiss for oral argument. #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction :( Motion Hearing set for Thursday, 6/24/2021 at 09:30 AM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court adjourned. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant: Bruce Burt, Levi Silver, Nathan Thomas. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson.(Time Start: 10:30, Time End: 10:35, Room Video Conference.)(asb)
May 26, 2021	Filing 117 NOTICE OF HEARING: Scheduling Conference set for 6/1/2021 at 10:30 AM by Zoom video conference before Judge Clark Waddoups. The scheduling conference is to facilitate setting the date for an evidentiary hearing. Because the scheduling conference will be short and conducted via Zoom, the parties are to make every effort to make themselves available for it.A video link will be emailed to counsel and the court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others are instructed to email utdecf_waddoups@utd.uscourts.gov to obtain the video link. (tdp)
May 21, 2021	Filing 116 SEALED DOCUMENT re #112 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Sealed Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document,,,, Order on Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document,,,, Order on Motion for Discovery,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Memorandum Decision,,,, Terminate Motions,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Reinitz, Ariel)
May 12, 2021	Filing 115 AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Motion Hearing set for 6/11/2021 at 10:00 AM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Note: Hearing will be held in-person. Parties should be prepared to present evidence on the jurisdictional issue. (tdp)
May 12, 2021	Filing 114 ORDER- the court hereby grants Riverland's request for an evidentiary hearing on personal jurisdiction. The evidentiary hearing is set for June 11, 2021 at 10:00 AM. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 5/12/21. (jrj)
May 12, 2021	Filing 113 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support : Motion Hearing set for Thursday, 5/27/2021 at 02:00 PM by Zoom video conference before Judge Clark Waddoups. Video conference link emailed to counsel and court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others instructed to email utdecf_waddouops@utd.uscourts.gov to obtain video link. (asb)
April 28, 2021	Filing 112 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER- denying without prejudice #49 Motion for Summary Judgment ; terminating #50 Sealed Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; terminating #57 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting #72 Motion for Discovery; terminating #76 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; terminating #79 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; terminating #93 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; terminating #98 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; terminating #102 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. The Clerk has unsealed the documents listed in the order as Column 3. On or before May 31, 2021 HTS shall file a document that identifies the trade secrets at issue with reasonable particularity. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/28/21. (jrj)
April 21, 2021	Filing 111 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #109 Notice (Other),, #103 Sealed Document,,, #102 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, < filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
April 21, 2021	Filing 110 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #76 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #75 Sealed Document,, , #90 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, #75 Sealed Document,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
April 21, 2021	Filing 109 NOTICE of Non-Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Maintain Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief (ECF Nos. 96, 99) Under Seal by Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC re #103 Sealed Document,,, #102 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, < (Silver, Levi)
April 16, 2021	Filing 108 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document, #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #75 Sealed Document,, #73 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Silver, Levi)
April 14, 2021	Filing 107 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #97 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, #106 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion, #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
April 13, 2021	Filing 106 REPLY to Response to Motion re #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
April 8, 2021	Filing 105 Motions No Longer Referred: #102 Plaintiffs' Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document will be addressed by the District Court Judge.
April 7, 2021	Filing 104 ORDER granting #101 Motion for Extension of Time and Plaintiffs' deadline to file its Motion pursuant to Local Rule DUCivR 5-3(b)(2) to maintain under seal portions Defendants Reply Brief (ECF Nos. 96, 99) shall be extended to April 7, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/7/21. (jrj)
April 7, 2021	Filing 103 SEALED DOCUMENT re #102 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, <, #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2-A, #2 Exhibit 2-B, #3 Exhibit 2-C, #4 Exhibit 2-D, #5 Exhibit 2-E, #6 Exhibit 2-F, #7 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Reinitz, Ariel)
April 7, 2021	Filing 102 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2-A, #2 Exhibit 2-B, #3 Exhibit 2-C, #4 Exhibit 2-D, #5 Exhibit 2-E, #6 Exhibit 2-F, #7 Exhibit Certificate of Service) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
April 7, 2021	Filing 101 MOTION for Extension of Time file DUCivR 5-3(b)(2) Motion filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
April 5, 2021	Filing 100 Motions No Longer Referred: Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document #98 . Motion will be handled by District Court Judge.
March 30, 2021	Filing 99 SEALED DOCUMENT re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLCNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Amit Declaration, #2 Exhibit F to Amit Declaration, #3 Exhibit G to Amit Declaration, #4 Affidavit Silver Declaration, #5 Certificate of Service)(Silver, Levi)
March 30, 2021	Filing 98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Silver, Levi)
March 30, 2021	Filing 97 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Silver Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4)(Silver, Levi)
March 30, 2021	Filing 96 Redacted REPLY to Response to Motion re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Amit Declaration, #2 Exhibit E, #3 Exhibit F, #4 Exhibit G, #5 Exhibit H, #6 Exhibit I, #7 Exhibit J, #8 Exhibit K, #9 Exhibit L, #10 Affidavit Barker Declaration, #11 Exhibit M, #12 Affidavit Silver Declaration, #13 Exhibit N, #14 Exhibit O, #15 Exhibit P, #16 Exhibit Q)(Silver, Levi)
March 27, 2021	Filing 95 Motions No Longer Referred: #93 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #92 Sealed Document. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)
March 26, 2021	Filing 94 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document , #91 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion, #78 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, #80 Sealed Document,, #58 Sealed Document,,,,,,,,,,,,,, #92 Sealed Document, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
March 24, 2021	Filing 93 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #92 Sealed Document, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Service) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 24, 2021	Filing 92 SEALED DOCUMENT re #91 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B2 (corresponds to Dkt. 91-1), #2 Exhibit B4 (corresponds to Dkt. 91-2), #3 Exhibit B7 (corresponds to Dkt. 91-3), #4 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 23, 2021	Filing 91 Redacted REPLY to Response to Motion re #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B2 (redacted), #2 Exhibit B4 (redacted), #3 Exhibit B7 (redacted))(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 23, 2021	Filing 90 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #76 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #75 Sealed Document,, filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Silver, Levi)
March 18, 2021	Filing 89 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE - granting Stipulated #87 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #87 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support , #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support . Replies due by 3/30/2021. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 3/18/21. (jrj)
March 17, 2021	Filing 88 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support , #60 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, #77 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
March 17, 2021	Filing 87 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support , #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Silver, Levi)
March 16, 2021	Filing 86 RESPONSE to Motion re #79 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
March 15, 2021	Filing 85 Motions No Longer Referred: #76 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #75 Sealed Document, and #79 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document. Motions will be handled by district judge. (tdp)
March 12, 2021	Filing 84 Motions No Longer Referred: #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)
March 12, 2021	Filing 83 ORDER granting #71 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order Discovery due by 12/6/2021. Motions due by 1/6/2022. See order for additional deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 03/12/2021. (jl)
March 11, 2021	Filing 82 NOTICE of Non-Opposition to Stipulated Motion for Amended Scheduling Order by Riverland Technologies LLC re #71 Stipulated MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order (Burt, Bruce)
March 10, 2021	Filing 81 Motions No Longer Referred: Defendants Redlpr LLC, Sagy Amit and Jeremy James McMichael Barker's Motion Regarding Filing Motion for Summary Judgment And Certain Exhibits Thereto Under Seal #50 will be addressed by the District Court.
March 9, 2021	Filing 80 SEALED DOCUMENT re #78 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLCNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Amit, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Affidavit of Service)(Silver, Levi)
March 9, 2021	Filing 79 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #78 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Silver, Levi) Modified by linking motion to redacted document on 3/10/2021 (jl).
March 9, 2021	Filing 78 Redacted MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Amit Redacted, #2 Exhibit A-Redacted, #3 Exhibit B-Redacted, #4 Exhibit C-Redacted, #5 Exhibit D-Redacted, #6 Exhibit E-Redacted, #7 Exhibit F-Redacted, #8 Exhibit G-Redacted, #9 Exhibit H-Redacted, #10 Exhibit I-Redacted, #11 Exhibit J-Redacted, #12 Exhibit K-Redacted)(Silver, Levi)
March 9, 2021	Filing 77 REPLY to Response to Motion re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC. (Burt, Bruce)
March 9, 2021	Filing 76 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #73 Redacted MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #75 Sealed Document,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Service) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel) Modified by linking motion to redacted document on 3/10/2021 (jl).
March 9, 2021	Filing 75 SEALED DOCUMENT re #73 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-C (corresponds to Dkt. 73-4), #2 Exhibit 1-E (corresponds to Dkt. 73-6), #3 Exhibit 1-F (corresponds to Dkt. 73-7), #4 Exhibit 1-K (corresponds to Dkt. 73-12), #5 Exhibit 1-M (corresponds to Dkt. 73-14), #6 Exhibit 1-S (corresponds to Dkt. 73-20), #7 Exhibit 1-V (corresponds to Dkt. 73-23), #8 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 8, 2021	Filing 74 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Defendant Riverland Technologies, LLC to file a response or, in the alternative, a notice of non-opposition to Plaintiffs' Stipulated Motion for Amended Scheduling Order #71 no later than March 12, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 03/08/2021. (amn)
March 5, 2021	Filing 73 Redacted MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support , #50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Ex. 1 (Declaration), #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Exhibit 1-D, #6 Exhibit 1-E, #7 Exhibit 1-F, #8 Exhibit 1-G, #9 Exhibit 1-H, #10 Exhibit 1-I, #11 Exhibit 1-J, #12 Exhibit 1-K, #13 Exhibit 1-L, #14 Exhibit 1-M, #15 Exhibit 1-N, #16 Exhibit 1-O, #17 Exhibit 1-P, #18 Exhibit 1-Q, #19 Exhibit 1-R, #20 Exhibit 1-S, #21 Exhibit 1-T, #22 Exhibit 1-U, #23 Exhibit 1-V, #24 Appendix Appendix of Evidence)(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 5, 2021	Filing 72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration in Support) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 4, 2021	Filing 71 Stipulated MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
March 2, 2021	Filing 70 ORDER granting #69 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support . Replies due by 3/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 03/01/2021. (jl)
March 1, 2021	Filing 69 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Burt, Bruce)
March 1, 2021	Filing 68 ORDER granting #67 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document and #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support. Replies due by 3/9/2021. Responses due by 3/5/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 03/01/2021. (jl) Modified by correcting deadlines on 3/3/2021 (jl).
February 26, 2021	Filing 67 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support , #50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document, #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document , #58 Sealed Document,,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 16, 2021	Filing 66 ORDER granting #64 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Replies due by 3/2/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/16/21. (jwt)
February 16, 2021	Filing 65 ORDER granting #63 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, Responses due by 2/26/2021; #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document, Responses due by 3/2/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/16/21. (jwt)
February 15, 2021	Filing 64 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Burt, Bruce) Modified on 2/16/2021 correcting entry type to Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply(jwt).
February 12, 2021	Filing 63 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support , #50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document, #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document , #58 Sealed Document,,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 8, 2021	Filing 62 ORDER granting #61 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Responses due by 2/6/2021 Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/8/21. (jwt)
February 8, 2021	Filing 61 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support , #60 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 6, 2021	Filing 60 Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3)(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 2, 2021	Filing 59 Motions No Longer Referred: Plaintiffs' Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document #57 will be addressed by the District Court. (amn)
February 2, 2021	Filing 58 SEALED DOCUMENT re #50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document, #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-1), #2 Exhibit 2 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-2), #3 Exhibit 3 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-3), #4 Exhibit 4 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-4), #5 Exhibit 5 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-5), #6 Exhibit 6 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-6), #7 Exhibit 12 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-12), #8 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 1, 2021	Filing 57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
January 26, 2021	Filing 56 Motions No Longer Referred: #50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by district judge.
January 25, 2021	Filing 55 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: Defendants REDLPR, LLC; Sagey Amit, and Jeremy James McMichael Barker have filed a sealed motion #50 that contains information marked "Confidential" by one or more Plaintiffs. Pursuant to DUCivR 5-3(b)(2)(C)(i), the court notifies Plaintiffs that on or before February 1, 2021, they must file a motion explaining why the documents they have designated "Confidential" should remain under seal. Failure to file such a motion will result in the respective documents being unsealed.The court admonishes the parties that compliance with this rule shall be required for any future filings that meet DUCivR 5-3(b)(2)(C)(i) conditions. Otherwise, the court may unseal future documents without further notice.No attached document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 1/25/2021. (tdp)
January 22, 2021	Filing 54 ORDER granting #53 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Responses due by 2/5/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 1/22/21. (jwt)
January 22, 2021	Filing 53 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
January 20, 2021	Filing 52 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC re #50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed documentSEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document Corrected (Silver, Levi)
January 20, 2021	Filing 51 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support Corrected (Silver, Levi)
January 15, 2021	Filing 50 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties) filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Motion Filed Under Seal, #2 Affidavit Exhibit A Amit Declaration, #3 Exhibit A2 Email, dated June 22, 2020, sent to RED, #4 Exhibit A3 Email, dated July 31, 2020, sent to RED, #5 Exhibit A5 HTS document titled "VRS for Parking Systems - Overview", #6 Exhibit A6 Compilation of specification sheets for cameras sold by HTS, #7 Exhibit A11 Compilation of specification sheets for computers sold by HTS, #8 Exhibit A12 Email from John Whiteman of HTS attaching non-confidential HTS customer presentation, #9 Exhibit A13 "Partners" webpage from HTS' public website, #10 Exhibit A14 Project bid submitted by HTS for potential LPR projection, #11 Exhibit A15 HTS price quotations, #12 Exhibit A16 HTS price list, #13 Exhibit A22 HTS' so-called "Sales Pipeline", #14 Exhibit A24 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #15 Exhibit A25 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #16 Exhibit Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #17 Exhibit A27 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #18 Exhibit A28 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #19 Exhibit A29 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #20 Exhibit A30 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #21 Exhibit A33 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #22 Affidavit Exhibit B Barker Declaration, #23 Exhibit B2 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #24 Exhibit B3 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #25 Exhibit B4 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #26 Exhibit B5 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #27 Exhibit B6 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #28 Exhibit B7 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #29 Exhibit B8 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #30 Exhibit B9 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #31 Exhibit B10 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #32 Exhibit B11 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #33 Exhibit B12 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #34 Affidavit Exhibit C Byerly Declaration, #35 Exhibit C3 Email string between Amit and Robert A. Byerly, #36 Affidavit Exhibit D Silver Declaration, #37 Exhibit D2 Plaintiff's initial responses and objections to the Interrogatories, Dated February 5, 2020, #38 Exhibit D3 Discovery meet-and-confer emails between counsel, #39 Exhibit D5 Plaintiff's amended responses and objections to the Interrogatories, Dated July 8, 2020 (designated "CONFIDENTIAL"), #40 Proposed Order, #41 Proof of Service) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Silver, Levi)
January 15, 2021	Filing 49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of Evidence, #2 Affidavit Exhibit A Amit Declaration -REDACTED], #3 Exhibit A1 Webpage from Houston Airport System Website listing potential bidders, #4 Exhibit A2 Email, dated June 22, 2020, sent to RED [SEALED], #5 Exhibit A3 Email, dated July 31, 2020, sent to RED [SEALED], #6 Exhibit A4 Amit employment agreement, #7 Exhibit A5 HTS document titled "VRS for Parking Systems - Overview" [SEALED], #8 Exhibit A6 Compliation of specification sheets for cameras sold by HTS [SEALED], #9 Exhibit A7 Compilation of specification sheets for various LPR cameras, #10 Exhibit A8 LPR specification guide downloaded from website, #11 Exhibit A9 LPR specification guide downloaded from website, #12 Exhibit A10 LPR specification guide downloaded from website, #13 Exhibit A11 Compilation of specification sheets for computers sold by HTS [SEALED], #14 Exhibit A12 Email from John Whiteman of HTS attaching non-confidential HTS customer presentation [SEALED], #15 Exhibit A13 "Partners" webpage from HTS' public website [SEALED], #16 Exhibit A14 Project bid submitted by HTS for potential LPR projection [SEALED], #17 Exhibit A15 HTS price quotations [SEALED], #18 Exhibit A16 HTS price list [SEALED], #19 Exhibit A17 HTS Form 8-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), #20 Exhibit A18 Exhibitor list for Parking Industry Expo ("PIE") 2020, #21 Exhibit A19 Exhibitor list for PIE 2019, #22 Exhibit A20 Parking Magazine 2020 International Buyers Guide, #23 Exhibit A21 Official Conference Program Guide, International Parking Institute ("IPI") 2018, #24 Exhibit A22 HTS' so-called "Sales Pipeline" [SEALED], #25 Exhibit A23 HTS Form 8-K filed with the SEC, #26 Exhibit A24 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #27 Exhibit A25 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #28 Exhibit A26 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #29 Exhibit A27 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #30 Exhibit A28 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #31 Exhibit A29 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #32 Exhibit A30 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #33 Exhibit A31 Docket sheet from California Superior Court Case No. 37-2018-00044543-CU-BC-CTL, #34 Exhibit A32 Letter, dated October 18, 2019, from Ariel Reinitz, #35 Exhibit A33 Email, dated September 24, 2020, sent to Sagy Amit [SEALED], #36 Affidavit Exhibit B Barker Declaration [REDACTED], #37 Exhibit B1 Barker employment agreement, #38 Exhibit B2 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #39 Exhibit B3 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #40 Exhibit B4 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #41 Exhibit B5 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #42 Exhibit B6 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #43 Exhibit B7 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #44 Exhibit B8 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #45 Exhibit B9 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #46 Exhibit B10 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #47 Exhibit B11 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #48 Exhibit B12 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #49 Affidavit Exhibit C Byerly Declaration [REDACTED], #50 Exhibit C1 Compilation of specification sheets for various LPR cameras, #51 Exhibit C2 Non disclosure agreement, #52 Exhibit C3 Email string between Amit and Robert A. Byerly [SEALED], #53 Affidavit Exhibit D Silver Declaration [REDACTED], #54 Exhibit D1 Defendants' Interrogatories, Set One, dated December 6, 2019 ("Interrogatories"), #55 Exhibit D2 Plaintiff's initial responses and objections to the Interrogatories, Dated February 5, 2020 [SEALED], #56 Exhibit D3 Discovery meet-and-confer emails between counsel [SEALED], #57 Exhibit D4 Discovery meet-and-confer emails between counsel, #58 Exhibit D5 Plaintiff's amended responses and objections to the Interrogatories, Dated July 8, 2020 (designated "CONFIDENTIAL") [SEALED], #59 Text of Proposed Order)(Silver, Levi)
January 15, 2021	Filing 48 ORDER granting #47 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Responses due by 1/22/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 1/15/21. (jwt)
January 15, 2021	Filing 47 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
January 6, 2021	Filing 46 ORDER granting #45 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Responses due by 1/15/2021 Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 1/6/21. (jwt)
January 5, 2021	Filing 45 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
December 9, 2020	Filing 44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - MS lawsuit, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Affidavit of Robert Byerly)(Burt, Bruce)
December 9, 2020	Filing 43 NOTICE of Appearance by Bruce C. Burt on behalf of Riverland Technologies LLC (Burt, Bruce)
November 3, 2020	Filing 42 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA as to Riverland Technologies LLC served on 10/20/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons Issued as to Riverland Technologies LLC)(Reinitz, Ariel)
October 29, 2020	Filing 41 ANSWER to #39 Amended Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC.(Thomas, Nathan)
October 16, 2020	Filing 40 RESTRICTED DOCUMENTSummons Issued Electronically as to Riverland Technologies LLC. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (dw)
October 15, 2020	Filing 39 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC with Jury Demand. New Defendants: Riverland Technologies LLC. filed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (NDA), #2 Exhibit B ("RedMatrix" camera), #3 Exhibit C ("RedMatrix" camera)) (Reinitz, Ariel)
October 13, 2020	Filing 38 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2021., Joinder of Parties due by 1/8/2021., Discovery due by 8/5/2021., Motions due by 9/6/2021., Scheduling/Status Conference reset for 9/15/2021 at 02:45 PM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/12/2020. (lnp)
October 13, 2020	Filing 37 ORDER granting #33 Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint. Complaint to be amended no Later than October 15, 2020. Plaintiffs are directed to place a copy of their First Amended Complaint on the court docket.ORDER granting #34 Plaintffs' unopposed Motion for Amended Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/12/2020. (lnp)
October 6, 2020	Filing 36 Plaintiff's REPLY to Response to Motion re #33 First MOTION to Amend/Correct and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)
September 22, 2020	Filing 35 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #33 First MOTION to Amend/Correct and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Levi Y. Silver in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Join Parties, #2 Exhibit 1 to Silver Declaration -- Riverland Complain)(Thomas, Nathan)
September 8, 2020	Filing 34 Second MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
September 8, 2020	Filing 33 First MOTION to Amend/Correct and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint (clean), #2 Exhibit Ex. A, #3 Exhibit Ex. B, #4 Exhibit Ex. C, #5 Exhibit Amended Complaint (redline)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
May 7, 2020	Filing 32 ORDER granting #31 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 4/5/2021. Motions due by 6/2/2021. Status Conference set for 6/2/2021 at 02:45 PM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 5/6/2020. (lnp)
May 5, 2020	Filing 31 First MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)
February 20, 2020	Filing 30 ORDER granting #29 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. Attorney H. Dickson Burton withdrawn from case for Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/20/2020. (las)
February 20, 2020	Filing 29 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Consent by Plaintiff, #2 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Burton, H.)
December 20, 2019	Filing 28 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn R. Bronson on behalf of HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution (Bronson, Glenn)
October 29, 2019	Filing 27 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 5/5/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 5/5/2020. Expert Discovery due by 12/5/2020. Motions due by 1/5/2021. Scheduling/Status Conference set for 1/13/2021 at 02:45 PM in Rm 8.100 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/29/19. (jmr)
October 28, 2019	Filing 26 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reinitz, Ariel)
October 24, 2019	Filing 25 ORDER granting #24 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of R. Mark Halligan for HTS Image Processing,R. Mark Halligan for HTS USA,R. Mark Halligan for Quest Solution. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/24/19. (jmr)
October 23, 2019	Filing 24 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of R. Mark Halligan , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3401733, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit B - ECF Registration Form, #3 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(Burton, H.)
October 21, 2019	Filing 23 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. The parties have not complied with #12 , #14 , related to submission of an Order to Propose Schedule. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and, on or before October 28, 2019, file an attorney planning meeting report and submit a proposed scheduling order, as outlined in the Order to Propose Schedule at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov/civil-case-scheduling. The proposed scheduling order shall be submitted directly to Magistrate Judge Pead's chambers at utdecf_pead@utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/21/2019. (docket text order, no document attached).
October 16, 2019	Filing 22 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A). Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 10/16/2019. (tdp)
August 21, 2019	Filing 21 All Consent/Reassignment Forms have now been received. After review of all forms, Case Reassigned to District Judge per request of one or more party(s). Case randomly assigned to Judge Clark Waddoups. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to the case. (nl)
August 21, 2019	Filing 20 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (nl)
August 12, 2019	Filing 19 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (nl)
August 8, 2019	Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Levi Y. Silver for Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, and Redlpr LLC. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 8/1/2019. (nl)
August 6, 2019	Filing 17 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Levi Y. Silver and Consent of Local Counsel, Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3342261, filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit B - ECF Registration Form, #3 Exhibit C - Proposed Order)(Thomas, Nathan)
August 6, 2019	Filing 16 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC, Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. Form due by 8/21/2019. (nl)
August 5, 2019	Filing 15 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. Attorney Nathan D. Thomas added to party Sagy Amit(pty:dft), Attorney Nathan D. Thomas added to party Jeremy James MC Michael Barker(pty:dft), Attorney Nathan D. Thomas added to party Redlpr LLC(pty:dft)(Thomas, Nathan)
August 1, 2019	Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time To Propose Schedule. The parties will have up to 14 days from the date counsel for Defendants files an appearance in this case to meet and confer regarding a Proposed Scheduling Order pursuant to this Courts Order to Propose Schedule dated 6/28/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 8/01/2019. (nl)
July 25, 2019	Filing 13 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time Order To Propose Schedule filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Reinitz, Ariel)
June 28, 2019	Filing 12 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 6/28/2019. (las)
June 26, 2019	Filing 11 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ariel Reinitz for HTS Image Processing,Ariel Reinitz for HTS USA,Ariel Reinitz for Quest Solution. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 6/26/2019. (las)
June 24, 2019	Filing 10 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA as to Sagy Amit served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019. (Burton, H.)
June 24, 2019	Filing 9 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA as to Redlpr LLC served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019. (Burton, H.)
June 24, 2019	Filing 8 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA as to Jeremy James MC Michael Barker served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019. (Burton, H.)
June 24, 2019	Filing 7 RESTRICTED DOCUMENTSummons Issued Electronically as to Jeremy James MC Michael Barker. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh)
June 24, 2019	Filing 6 RESTRICTED DOCUMENTSummons Issued Electronically as to Sagy Amit. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh)
June 24, 2019	Filing 5 RESTRICTED DOCUMENTSummons Issued Electronically as to Redlpr LLC. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh)
June 24, 2019	Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Ariel Reinitz, for Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (nl)
June 24, 2019	Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ariel Reinitz , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3308294, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Admission, #2 Exhibit B - ECF Registration Form, #3 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(Burton, H.)
June 24, 2019	Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3308271) filed by Quest Solution, HTS USA, HTS Image Processing. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner (Burton, H.) Modified on 6/24/2019 to add HTS Image Processing as a filer (nl).
June 24, 2019	Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner. Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl)

January 25, 2023

Filing 308 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #306 MOTION for Leave to File Addendum to Motion to Pierce Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

January 12, 2023

Filing 307 Motions No Longer Referred: #306 MOTION for Leave to File Addendum to Motion to Pierce Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by District Court Judge. (tdp)

January 11, 2023

Filing 306 MOTION for Leave to File Addendum to Motion to Pierce Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Amit Declaration and Exhibits, #2 Barker Declaration and Exhibits) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)

November 30, 2022

Filing 304 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to file Sur-Reply is GRANTED #303 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/30/2022.

November 21, 2022

Filing 303 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply (in response to Dkt. 301) and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 ([Proposed] Sur-Reply in response to Dkt. 301), #2 Exhibit 1-A (Declaration), #3 Exhibit 1-B (USPTO filing receipt - US 17/237,044), #4 Exhibit 1-C (Patent specification - US 63/013,523) (redacted), #5 Exhibit 1-D (Patent specification - US 17/237,044) (redacted), #6 Exhibit 1-E (USPTO "first action letter" - US 17/237,044), #7 Exhibit 1-F (Bibliographic Data - US 17/237,044)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

November 14, 2022

Filing 302 NOTICE of Evidentiary Objections (to ECF No. 301) by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #301 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion (Reinitz, Ariel)

November 7, 2022

Filing 301 REPLY to Response to Motion re #298 MOTION to Unseal Case and Memorandum in Support MOTION to Pierce the Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration)(jrj)

November 1, 2022

Filing 300 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #298 MOTION to Unseal Case and Memorandum in Support MOTION to Pierce the Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (declaration - A. Reinitz), #2 Exhibit A-1 (Schedule 14A Proxy Statement), #3 Exhibit A-2 (Annual Report), #4 Exhibit A-3 (USPTO Filing Receipt - US 63/013,523), #5 Exhibit B (declaration - J. Whiteman))(Reinitz, Ariel)

October 24, 2022

Filing 299 Motions No Longer Referred: MOTION to Unseal Case and Pierce the Corporate Veil #298 .

October 18, 2022

Filing 298 MOTION to Unseal Case and Memorandum in Support, MOTION to Pierce the Corporate Veil and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 A-Declaration of Sagy Amit in support) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)

July 27, 2022

Filing 297 DOCKET TEXT ORDER terminating #202 Motion to Expedite per 296 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 07/27/2022.

July 27, 2022

Filing 296 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. On March 18, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff's Short Form Discovery Motion #202 ("Motion") subject to certification that Defendants provided all documents responsive to RFP 38 in compliance with the Court's March 10, 2022, Ruling #207 . On March 25, 2022, Defendants filed their certifications [210, 211, 212] and Plaintiff's Motion is now moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 07/27/2022.

July 25, 2022

Filing 295 NOTICE of SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support, #267 Sealed Document,,, #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support, #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and, #290 Sealed Document, #209 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, #174 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Gen. Water Techs. Inc. v. Van Zweden, 2022 UT App 90) (Reinitz, Ariel)

June 30, 2022

Filing 294 Opposition to Dkt. 286 BRIEF re #286 Response (NOT to motion) filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

June 28, 2022

Filing 293 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #292 Brief filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Reinitz, Ariel)

June 28, 2022

Filing 292 Response to ECF No. 291 BRIEF filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

June 24, 2022

Filing 291 ORDER VACATING EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND REQUIRING SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION set for 06/28/2022 before Judge Clark Waddoups. See order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 06/24/2022. (kpf)

June 22, 2022

Filing 290 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #272 Order, #289 Response (NOT to motion), filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Reinitz, Ariel)

June 22, 2022

Filing 289 Redacted RESPONSE re #272 Order,,(Response to Order to Show Cause) filed by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (declaration), #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Exhibit 1-D, #6 Exhibit 1-E)(Reinitz, Ariel)

June 8, 2022

Filing 288 Plaintiff's RESPONSE re #272 Order filed by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

June 7, 2022

Filing 287 REPLY to Response to Motion re #50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel) Modified on 6/8/2022 to take out unnecessary text (jrj).

June 2, 2022

Filing 286 RESPONSE re #249 Memorandum Decision, filed by Sagy Amit. (jrj)

June 2, 2022

Filing 285 REPLY to Response to Motion re #50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT*) filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)

May 27, 2022

Filing 283 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Motion for Summary Judgment held on April 20, 2022 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court Reporter/Transcriber Laura Robinson, RPR, FCRR, CSR, CP, Telephone number (801)328-4800. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. To redact additional information a Motion to Redact must be filed. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 6/17/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/8/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/25/2022. (jrj)

May 26, 2022

Filing 282 EXHIBITS filed by Sagy Amit re #279 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E-Brian Tarbell Declaration Ace Parking, #2 Exhibit F-Amir Borochov Declaration Ohana, #3 Exhibit H1-Hitron Initial contact by AMIT, #4 Exhibit H2-Hitron requestsw LPC cameras for another client, #5 Exhibit H3-Amit reassures Hitron a payment will be made March 2018, #6 Exhibit H4-First request for Dual Head Camera, #7 Exhibit H5-Hitron rendering of Dual head camera sent to Amit and Barker, #8 Exhibit H6-Amit and Hage text messages over the years, #9 Exhibit S0-Levi Silver Email to Plaintiff regarding Reinitz letter, #10 Exhibit S1-Levi Silver Email to Plaintiff regarding Reinitz letter-12192019, #11 Exhibit S2-Notice-Subpeonas Quest RedLPR Ohana and OKYLE)(jrj)

May 26, 2022

Filing 281 EXHIBITS filed by Sagy Amit re #279 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion. Further Exhibits to follow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B2-RE Company Plans, #2 Exhibit B3-RE Chat tomorrow regarding inventory, #3 Exhibit B4-RE ETA UPDATE PO number 3101, #4 Exhibit B5-RE Employee benefits, #5 Exhibit B6-FW Open sales orders-Supply dates 10.4.18, #6 Exhibit B7-RE Employee Benefits, #7 Exhibit Exhibit B8-FW HTS Order...Hialeah PD at Risk, #8 Exhibit B9-RE N70 730nm vs 850nm, #9 Exhibit B10-Amit 1028 Emails and Payments for Trade Shows, #10 Exhibit B11-FW Stevens Institute equipment installation, #11 Exhibit B12-HTS LPI solution at Oklahoma Airport, #12 Exhibit B13-FW O'Donnell Approved, #13 Exhibit B14-GRF LPR, #14 Exhibit B15-Resignation)(jrj)

May 26, 2022

Filing 280 EXHIBITS filed by Sagy Amit re #279 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion. Further exhibits to follow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A1-Amit first email notice of rule 11 violation, #2 Exhibit A2-Amit first email refusing discovery extension, #3 Exhibit A3-Amit first service of 21 days safe harbor, #4 Exhibit A4-Amit requesting depositions and prefiling evidence, #5 Exhibit A5-Amit notifying Reinitz of Bad Faith Settlement use, #6 Exhibit A6-Amit 2nd safe harbor service to all counsel of record, #7 Exhibit A7-Amit 2nd notice of deposition and Reinitz delaying tactics, #8 Exhibit A8-Amit 3rd safe harbor email notifying Reinitz of spoilation of evidence, #9 Exhibit A9-Amit email asking Reinitz to stopy delaying and increasing the costs of bad faith, #10 Exhibit A10-Amit email calling out Reinitz on his abuse of discovery in attempt to increase costs, #11 Exhibit A11-Amit 3rd notice to Reinitz to accept depositions invites, #12 Exhibit A12-Amit email calling out Reinitz on his delays in scheduling depositions, #13 Exhibit A13-Amit email asking Reinitz to produce NDA's, #14 Exhibit A14-Amit email asking Reinitz to produce documents received via subpoena, #15 Exhibit A15-Amit email showing all contracts with plaintiff were signed after defendants resignation, #16 Exhibit A16-Amit email asking for subpeonad documents-3rd request, #17 Exhibit A17-Amit email notifiying Reinitz of his abuse of process and unclean hands, #18 Exhibit A18-Amit 5th email notifying Reinitz of violation of rule 11, #19 Exhibit A19-Reinitz bad faith settlement tactics, #20 Exhibit A10-Amit notifying Reinitz of minimum settlement agreeable by defendants, #21 Exhibit A21-Good faith attempt to settle by defendants, #22 Exhibit A22-Amit 6th email notifying Reinitz of violation of rule 11 and spoilation of evidence, #23 Exhibit A23-Dfts 4th good faith attempt to settle during safe harbor, #24 Exhibit A24-Reinitz objections to produce document received via subpoenas, #25 Exhibit A25-Amit questioning Reinitz on taking deposition on the last day, #26 Exhibit A26-Amit notifying Reinitz of his misconduct throughout litigation, #27 Exhibit A27-Amit notifying Reinitz of perjury during Lustgarten deposition, #28 Exhibit A28-Dfts 5th good faith attempt to settle during safe harbor, #29 Exhibit A29-Amit good faith attempt to peacefully resolve the San Diego action, #30 Exhibit A30-Amit good faith notification of intention to file a RICO claim, #31 Exhibit A31-Dfts 6th good faith attempt to settle before filing RICO claim, #32 Exhibit A32-Reinitz Withdraw as counsel from 3 pending cases on April 21 2022)(jrj)

May 26, 2022

Filing 279 REPLY to Response to Motion re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declaration of Sagy Amit in support of Rule 11 Sanctions, #2 Exhibit B-Declaration of Jeremy Barker in support of Rule 11 Sanctions) Further exhibits will follow.(jrj)

May 26, 2022

Filing 277 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on April 21, 2022 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke, CSR, RPR, RMR, Telephone number 801-521-7238. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. To redact additional information a Motion to Redact must be filed. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 6/16/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/7/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/24/2022. (jrj)

May 25, 2022

Filing 276 APPENDIX to #275 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-E)(Reinitz, Ariel)

May 23, 2022

Filing 275 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Exhibit 1-D, #6 Exhibit 1-F, #7 Exhibit 1-G, #8 Exhibit 1-H, #9 Exhibit 1-I)(Reinitz, Ariel)

May 23, 2022

Filing 272 NOTICE OF HEARING TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED ON HTS - REDACTED VERSION FOR RELEASE TO PUBLIC-On or before June 8, 2022, HTS shall inform the court whether it intends to put on evidence at the June 28, 2022 hearing and how many days it needs at the hearing to address the above. See Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 5/23/22. (jrj)

May 17, 2022

Filing 271 Minute Entry Status Conference held on 5/17/2022 for proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Counsel, Mr. Amit, court, and court reporter present by Zoom video conference. Discussion heard on rescheduling the Rule 11 motion hearing, due to delay in preparation of the transcripts. Mr. Ong intends to join the motion on behalf of his clients. Mr. Amit requested a one-week extension to respond to his Rule 11 motion. Court granted the request. Court stayed expert discovery deadline, pending resolution of the Rule 11 motion(s). Set Deadlines/Hearing as to #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support : Replies due by 5/27/2022. Motion Hearing set for 6/28/2022 - 06/29/2022 at 10:00 AM - 04:00 PM [Courtroom TBD] before Judge Clark Waddoups.Court adjourned. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant: Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Kelly Hicken.(Time Start: 11:00, Time End: 11:15, Room Video Conference.)(asb)

May 9, 2022

Filing 270 NOTICE OF HEARING: Status Conference set for 5/17/2022 at 11:00 AM in US District Court-SLCU *virtual Court Via Zoom Conference* before Judge Clark Waddoups. Video link will be emailed to counsel, the pro se defendant, and the court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others instructed to email utdecf_waddoups@utd.uscourts.gov to obtain video link. (tdp)

May 9, 2022

Filing 269 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The hearing transcript for April 20, 2022 hearing is anticipated to be released tomorrow. The court has been informed, however, that the hearing transcript for the April 21, 2022 hearing will not be available until May 18, 2022. Due to this delay, the court further extends briefing relative to Docket Text Order (ECF No. 245). The following second amended schedule shall apply:1. Plaintiffs shall file an opening brief on or before May 23, 2022;2. Defendants shall file an opposition brief on or before June 2, 2022;3. Plaintiffs shall file a reply brief, if any, on or before June 7, 2022. No attached document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 5/9/2022. (tdp)

May 6, 2022

Filing 268 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #116 Sealed Document,, #249 Memorandum Decision,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Reinitz, Ariel)

May 6, 2022

Filing 267 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support, #266 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 261 Order on Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (declaration), #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Exhibit 1-D, #6 Exhibit 1-E, #7 Exhibit 1-F, #8 Exhibit 1-G, #9 Exhibit 1-H, #10 Exhibit 1-I, #11 Exhibit 1-J, #12 Exhibit 1-K, #13 Exhibit 1-L, #14 Exhibit 1-M, #15 Exhibit 1-N, #16 Exhibit 1-O, #17 Exhibit 1-P, #18 Exhibit 1-Q, #19 Exhibit 1-R, #20 Exhibit 1-S, #21 Exhibit 1-T, #22 Exhibit 1-U, #23 Exhibit 1-V)(Reinitz, Ariel)

May 6, 2022

Filing 266 Redacted MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (declaration) (redacted), #2 Exhibit 1-Q, #3 Exhibit 1-R, #4 Exhibit 1-S)(Reinitz, Ariel)

May 4, 2022

Filing 265 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #263 Motion for Extension of Time. For briefing relative to Docket Text Order (ECF No. 245), the following amended schedule shall apply:1. Plaintiffs shall file an opening brief on or before May 13, 2022;2. Defendants shall file an opposition brief on or before May 27, 2022;3. Plaintiffs shall file a reply brief, if any, on or before June 1, 2022. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 5/4/2022. No attached document. (tdp)

May 3, 2022

Filing 264 Motions No Longer Referred: #263 MOTION for Extension of Time briefing schedule set in Dkt. 249 and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)

May 3, 2022

Filing 263 MOTION for Extension of Time briefing schedule set in Dkt. 249 and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (email re: hearing transcript)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

April 29, 2022

Filing 262 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting in part and denying in part #257 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages.1. The court grants Plaintiffs leave to file an overlength opening brief re ECF No. 245. Such brief shall not exceed 40 pages.2. Plaintiffs also may file an overlength brief in opposition to ECF No. 243. Such brief shall not exceed 28 pages. 3. The court denies Plaintiffs leave to file an overlength reply brief re ECF No. 245 because the request is premature. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 04/29/2022. No attached document. (tdp)

April 29, 2022

Filing 261 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #256 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Documents. At this time, the court will allow Plaintiffs to file the specified documents under seal for in camera review due to their alleged privileged nature. After the court's review, it will determine if the documents should be disclosed to the defendants. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/29/2022. No attached document. (tdp)

April 29, 2022

Filing 260 REPLY to Response to Motion re #256 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support , #257 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

April 29, 2022

Filing 259 Motions No Longer Referred: #256 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support , and #257 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and Memorandum in Support. Motions will be handled by district judge. (tdp)

April 29, 2022

Filing 258 RESPONSE to Motion re #256 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support , #257 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)

April 28, 2022

Filing 257 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

April 28, 2022

Filing 256 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #243 MOTION for Sanctions and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

April 25, 2022

Filing 249 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - The court dismisses Counts III and VI to the extent they are based on factual allegations supporting a misappropriation of trade secrets or otherwise confidential information. Additionally, the court directs the following: The Clerks Office shall lodge the exhibits Mr. Amit submitted on April 13, 2022, with an effective date of April 13, 2022; On or before May 6, 2022, Plaintiffs shall supplement the record with the underlying documents on which they rely in their Trade Secret designation #116 and their opposition to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment and Motions to Dismiss; The briefing schedules set forth above supersede prior dates that were set and shall govern the parties briefing. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/25/22. (jrj)

April 21, 2022

Filing 248 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Counsel and parties present. Argument heard on the pending dispostive motions. Briefing on the preemptive copyright issue and Rule 11 motion: Responses due by 5/9/2022, Replies due by 5/16/2022. Motion Hearing set for 6/9/2022 at 10:00 AM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court adjourned.Motion Hearing held on 4/21/2022 re: 49 50 148 166 204 Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant: Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Becky Janke.(Time Start: 10:00, Time End: 4:40, Room 7.300.)(asb)

April 20, 2022

Filing 247 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Counsel and parties present. Argument heard on the pending motions for summary judgment. Court recessed and will reconvene Thursday, 4/21/2022 at 10:00 a.m.Court adjourned. Motion Hearing held on 4/20/2022 re: #49 #50 #148 #166 #204 . Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant: Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson.(Time Start: 10:00, Time End: 4:15, Room 7.300.)(asb)

April 19, 2022

Filing 246 Motions No Longer Referred: Defendant's Motion for Sanctions #243 will be handled by the District Court.

April 18, 2022

Filing 245 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: Having reviewed the pending Motions to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment, and the record, the court concludes it is necessary to re-open the first Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. #49 and #50 ) and the April 28, 2021 Memorandum Decision (ECF No. #112 ) as to the Non-Trade Secret Claims. On the second day of the hearing (April 21, 2022), the court requests that the parties be prepared to address the following issues:1.To the extent Counts III through VII are not based on trade secret misappropriation, is there evidence creating material issues of fact as to these claims? If so, what is such evidence?2.To the extent Counts III through VII are not based on trade secret misappropriation, are any of them barred by copyright preemption law?3.To the extent Counts III through VII are not based on trade secret misappropriation, are any of them barred by the first to breach rule or economic loss rule? Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/18/2022. No attached document. (tdp)

April 18, 2022

Filing 244 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: #240 Motion to Lodge HTS Purchase Agreement is GRANTED. The [240-1] agreement shall be considered part of the record. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/18/2022. No attached document. (tdp)

April 18, 2022

Filing 243 MOTION for Rule 11 Sanctions and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Recommendations, #2 Exhibit A1-Amit vs. HTS, #3 Exhibit A2-Employment Docs, #4 Exhibit A3-Neev-Niv-Nissenson Signature, #5 Exhibit A4-HTS-Barker Employment, #6 Exhibit A5-Amit and Mayer at BOMA, #7 Exhibit A6-Teamtronics acquires HTS for 4 million, #8 Exhibit A7-Quest HTS Ltr Precision Bell 10-18-2019, #9 Exhibit B-Haim Nissenson Subpoena and HTS V Amit complaint, #10 Exhibit B1-Nissenson v RADA, #11 Exhibit B2-9-30-21-Niv Guy Nissensoh SEC, #12 Exhibit B3-Swiftnet V. MG Telecom, #13 Exhibit B4-Verizon UK Ltd v Swiftnet Ltd, #14 Exhibit B5-NTS Comm vs. State of Texas Franchise Tax, #15 Exhibit B6-Tax Withholding Lien-Niv Nessenson, #16 Exhibit B7-Anney PIV Nissenson Family, #17 Exhibit B8-Nissenson Niv Neev signatures, #18 Exhibit B9-Big Game vast crypto scam) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)

April 15, 2022

Filing 242 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re 229 Order,,,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Reinitz, Ariel)

April 15, 2022

Filing 241 EXHIBITS filed by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re 229 Order,,,,, #209 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Reinitz, Ariel)

April 15, 2022

Filing 240 MOTION to Lodge HTS Purchase Agreement and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 TA-Quest-HTS Acquisition Agreement) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)

April 14, 2022

Filing 239 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTIONS re: #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support, #204 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support , #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant) Motions Hearing set for 4/20/2022 at 10:00 AM in Rm 7.300 before Judge Clark Waddoups. ***Note: The hearing on the pending motions is not an evidentiary hearing. Instead, the parties may only present oral argument on the motions. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah (tdp)

April 14, 2022

Filing 238 NOTICE VACATING EVIDENTIARY HEARING set for 04/20/2022 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge Waddoups. Part 1 of the hearing scheduled for April 20, 2022 is VACATED. Once the court issues a ruling on the #148 and #204 Motions to Dismiss and the #166 Second Motion for Summary Judgment, if a party concludes the court should hear the motion to unseal documents, the court will set a new date for the evidentiary hearing. (tdp)

April 14, 2022

Filing 237 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Status Conference held on 4/14/2022. Counsel present by Zoom video conference. Court informed counsel that the evidentiary hearing on the sealed documents will not be conducted on April 20-21, 2022. Counsel to be prepared for oral argument on the pending motion for summary judgment and motion to dismiss on April 20-21, 2022. Court adjourned. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Attorney for Defendant: Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson.(Time Start: 3:00, Time End: 3:10, Room Video Conference.)(asb)

April 13, 2022

Filing 236 Proposed Exhibit & Witness List for hearings to be held 4/20/2022 and 4/21/2022 by Sagy Amit. (asb) .

April 13, 2022

Filing 235 Witness and Exhibit List, filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)

April 13, 2022

Filing 234 NOTICE of listing of exhibits Plaintiffs may offer at Apr. 20, 2022 evidentiary hearing by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #218 Order on Motion for ADR, (Reinitz, Ariel)

April 12, 2022

Filing 233 RESPONSE re #232 Notice (Other)/Plaintiff Objection, filed by Sagy Amit. (jrj)

April 12, 2022

Filing 232 NOTICE of Plaintiffs' objections to the voluntary appearance of witnesses at April 20, 2022 evidentiary hearing by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #223 Witness List(Proposed), #218 Order on Motion for ADR, (Reinitz, Ariel)

April 12, 2022

Filing 231 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re 229 Order, filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)

April 12, 2022

Filing 230 NOTICE of Docket from Mississippi(61CI1:20-cv-00218-JM) filed by Sagy Amit per Order 229 . (jrj)

April 12, 2022

NOTICE OF HEARING (to add courtroom number): Evidentiary Hearing set for 4/20/2022 - 4/21/2022 at 10:00 AM in Rm 7.300 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Motions Hearing re: #204 MOTION to Dismiss; , #148 MOTION to Dismiss; #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment set for 4/20/2022 - 4/21/2022 at 10:00 AM in Rm 7.300 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Courtroom 7.300, Salt Lake City, Utah. (asb)

April 11, 2022

Filing 229 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The court has concluded the following items are needed in connection with Part 2 of the April 20, 2022 hearing:1. Plaintiffs shall provide a copy of the Settlement Agreement and any releases reached between them and Riverland Technologies, LLC in Mississippi Case No. 61CI1:20-cv-218-JE. The document shall be filed under seal without service on the defendants in this matter, and will be reviewed by the court in camera.2. REDLPR, LLC shall provide a copy of the docket list in Mississippi Case No. 61CI1:20-cv-218-JE. Only the docket list, and not the documents themselves, need to be provided.3. Mr. Amit shall provide a copy of the Settlement Agreement and any releases reached between him and the Plaintiffs in California Case No. 37-2018-00044543-CU-BC-CTL. Mr. Amit shall file the document under seal.4. In Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs attached Exhibit 1-K. The Exhibit references three attachments. Plaintiffs shall provide a copy of those three attachments.The requested items shall be filed on the docket, in accordance with the above instructions, on or before April 15, 2022. No attached document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/11/2022. (tdp)

April 11, 2022

Filing 228 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The court grants #226 Motion Requesting In-Person Hearing.The April 20, 2022 hearing has two parts. Part 1 is an evidentiary hearing on whether certain documents, designated in the record as Confidential, should remain under seal. The determination about whether a document is Confidential is different from the determination about whether a document is a trade secret. The evidentiary hearing will focus only on whether the designated documents should remain under seal as Confidential.Part 2 is oral argument on the Motion to Dismiss (ECF Nos. #148 and #204 ) and the Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. #166 ). See Order, at Paragraph 8 (ECF No. #199 ).If two days are needed for the hearing, the parties should be prepared to continue the hearing through April 21, 2022. The court will notify the parties shortly about the courtroom number in which the hearing will be held. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/11/2022. No attached document. (tdp)

April 11, 2022

Filing 227 Motions No Longer Referred: Defendants' Motion Requesting In Person Hearing #226 will be addressed by the District Court.

April 9, 2022

Filing 226 First MOTION Requesting In-Person Hearing filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Ong, Jacob)

April 9, 2022

Filing 225 First REPLY to Response to Motion re #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of Exhibits, #2 Affidavit 7 of Barker, #3 Affidavit 9 of Ong, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 10a, #6 Exhibit 11)(Ong, Jacob)

April 8, 2022

Filing 224 NOTICE of witnesses Plaintiffs will or may call at Apr. 20, 2022 Evidentiary Hearing by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #218 Order on Motion for ADR, (Reinitz, Ariel)

April 8, 2022

Filing 223 Proposed Witness List for April 20th Evidentiary Hearing by Sagy Amit. (jrj)

April 8, 2022

Filing 222 NOTICE of Mediator Selection and Mediation Date by HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution re #218 Order on Motion for ADR, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Reinitz, Ariel)

April 4, 2022

Filing 220 DEPOSITION(s) of Various-See Attachments/Submission taken on Various dates-See Attachments/Submission. filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Barker,Jeremy-011822, #2 Exhibit 2-2-Whiteman,John-021022, #3 Exhibit 3-Hofman,Yoram-022222, #4 Exhibit 4-Lustgarten,Shai-022322)(jrj)

April 1, 2022

Filing 219 DEPOSITION of S. Amit, J. Barker, RedLPR (30(b)(6) by Mr. Barker) taken on March 7-9, 2022 filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Amit deposition transcript), #2 Exhibit B1 (Barker deposition transcript, pt. 1), #3 Exhibit B2 (Barker deposition transcript, pt. 2), #4 Exhibit C (RedLPR 30(b)(6) deposition transcript) (by Mr. Barker))(Reinitz, Ariel)

April 1, 2022

Filing 218 ORDER granting #206 Motion for ADR - Mediation. Plaintiffs shall file on the docket the full transcripts for the depositions of Sagy Amit, Jeremy Barker, and the 30(b)(6) deposition of REDLPR, LLC by 6:00 p.m. today. Plaintiffs shall simultaneously provide a copy to the defendants. See Order for other details and deadlines. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/1/22. (jrj)

March 30, 2022

Filing 217 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: #206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support: Motion Hearing set for 4/1/2022 at 11:00 AM in US District Court-SLCU *virtual Court Via Zoom Conference* before Judge Clark Waddoups. Video link will be emailed to counsel, the pro se defendant, and the court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others instructed to email utdecf_waddoups@utd.uscourts.gov to obtain video link. (tdp)

March 28, 2022

Filing 216 APPENDIX to #209 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution (Appendix of Evidence). (Reinitz, Ariel)

March 28, 2022

Filing 215 First RESPONSE to Motion re #206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Ong, Jacob)

March 28, 2022

Filing 214 Plaintiff's REPLY to Response to Motion re #206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support (confirming Plaintiffs' agreement with Mr. Amit's stipulations in Dkt. 213) filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

March 28, 2022

Filing 213 RESPONSE to Motion re #206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)

March 25, 2022

Filing 212 Third RESPONSE to Motion re #202 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: sanctions MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support Certification filed by Defendant Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, email chain in support of Exhibt B, #2 Exhibit B, PowerPoint to TIBA, #3 Exhibit C, email chain in support of Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit D, PowerPoint to LAZ)(Ong, Jacob)

March 25, 2022

Filing 211 Second RESPONSE to Motion re #202 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: sanctions MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Jeremy James MC Michael Barker. (Ong, Jacob)

March 25, 2022

Filing 210 Dft Amit Statement and Certification Regarding RFP 38 and court order 207. Response re #207 Order filed by Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(kpf)

March 24, 2022

Filing 209 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Exhibit 1-D, #6 Exhibit 1-E, #7 Exhibit 1-F, #8 Exhibit 1-G, #9 Exhibit 1-H, #10 Exhibit 1-I, #11 Exhibit 1-J, #12 Exhibit 1-K, #13 Exhibit 1-L, #14 Exhibit 1-M, #15 Exhibit 1-N, #16 Exhibit 1-O, #17 Exhibit 1-P, #18 Exhibit 1-Q, #19 Exhibit 1-R, #20 Exhibit 1-S, #21 Exhibit 1-T, #22 Exhibit 1-U)(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 24, 2022

Filing 208 Motions No Longer Referred: #206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)

March 23, 2022

Filing 207 ORDER re: Plaintiffs short form discovery motion seeking sanctions. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 3/23/22. (jrj)

March 22, 2022

Filing 206 Plaintiff's MOTION for ADR - Mediation and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 22, 2022

Filing 205 REPLY to Response to Motion re #202 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: sanctions MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (email), #2 Exhibit B (correspondence between counsel))(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 19, 2022

Filing 204 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit A, #2 Affidavit B)(Ong, Jacob)

March 19, 2022

Filing 203 First RESPONSE to Motion re #202 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: sanctions MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (email), #2 Exhibit B (email), #3 Exhibit C (email))(Ong, Jacob)

March 18, 2022

Filing 202 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: sanctions , MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (deposition transcript excerpts acknowledging discovery deficiencies)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 11, 2022

Filing 201 NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of flash drive filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. The flash drive was not entered on the docket due to (size, file type, CD, DVD, etc) and will be retained in a case file folder in the Clerk's Office while the case is active, and according to the retention schedule set forth by the Judicial Conference thereafter. THE FLASH DRIVE IS SEALED. (jrj)

March 11, 2022

Filing 199 ORDER - This matter is before the court on several issues that have arisen in this case. Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment #192 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The court grants an extension, but Plaintiffs shall have only until March 24, 2022 to file their opposition brief to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs' Motion for Amended Scheduling Order #195 is DENIED. On February 14, 2022, Mr. Amit filed a Notice of Documentation of Costs #175 . The court has reviewed the document and concludes the costs are reasonable. Plaintiffs shall reimburse Mr. Amit $250 on or before March 31, 2022. The court reiterates that documents previously designated as confidential by the court, see Memorandum Decision, at 12 #112 , shall retain that status unless the court orders otherwise. Court Reporter required Y. Interpreter required N. Is this an In-person Hearing Y. The court sets an in-person Evidentiary Hearing for April 20, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. to address whether some or all of the sealed documents in this case should be unsealed. ( Evidentiary Hearing set for 4/20/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Clark Waddoups.) At the April 20, 2022 in-person hearing, the court will also hear oral argument on the Motion to Dismiss #148 and Second Motion for Summary Judgment #166 . The court will enter a separate notice once it determines in which courtroom the Evidentiary Hearing and Hearing on Motions will be held. If a second day is needed to complete oral argument, the parties should be prepared to continue the hearing through April 21, 2022. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 3/11/22. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah(jrj)

March 10, 2022

Filing 198 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Counsel, pro-se party, court, and court reporter present by Zoom video conference. Argument heard on the plaintiffs' motion to amend the scheduling order to take additional 30(b)(6) depositions. Court denied the motion. Briefing on the MSJ: Responses due 3/24/2022; Reply due 4/1/2022. Oral argument and evidentiary hearing set for 4/20/2022 at 10:00 a.m., in-person (courtroom TBD). Court will issue a written order with the ruling and dates.Court adjourned. granting #192 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and, #192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and and Memorandum in Support , #195 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support , #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support ( Replies due by 4/1/2022., Responses due by 3/24/2022); denying #195 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order ; Motion Hearing held on 3/10/2022 re #192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and and Memorandum in Support filed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, #195 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA ; Status Conference held on 3/10/2022; Set Deadlines/Hearing as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and, #192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and and Memorandum in Support , #195 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support , #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support :( Replies due by 4/1/2022., Responses due by 3/24/2022, Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2022 at 10:00 AM in Rm 1.100 (Clerk's Office) before Judge Clark Waddoups.). Written Order to follow oral order: Yes. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson.(Time Start: 9:30, Time End: 10:10, Room Video Conference.) (asb)

March 10, 2022

Filing 197 Motions No Longer Referred: #195 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)

March 10, 2022

Filing 196 ORDER granting #190 Motion for Short Term Discovery; terminating #190 Motion to Expedite. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, RedLPR, LLC shall produce to Plaintiffs all documents and communications responsive to RFP 38. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 3/10/22. (jrj)

March 9, 2022

Filing 195 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 8, 2022

Filing 194 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: #192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 3/10/2022 at 09:30 AM in US District Court-SLCU *virtual Court Via Zoom Conference* before Judge Clark Waddoups. This hearing will be combined with the Status and Scheduling Conference previously noticed for the same date and time. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah (tdp)

March 8, 2022

Filing 193 Motions No Longer Referred: #192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion will be handled by District Court Judge. (tdp)

March 8, 2022

Filing 192 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 3, 2022

Filing 191 First RESPONSE to Motion re #190 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents / communications responsive to RFP 38 MOTION to Expedite Motion to Compel and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Ong, Jacob)

February 22, 2022

Filing 190 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents / communications responsive to RFP 38 , MOTION to Expedite Motion to Compel and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 19, 2022

Filing 189 NOTICE OF HEARING: Status and Scheduling Conference set for 3/10/2022 at 09:30 AM in US District Court-SLCU *virtual Court Via Zoom Conference* before Judge Clark Waddoups.Several issues have arisen about sealed documents and how the court's system works relative to sealed documents. The Status Conference is to address the procedural aspects of redacted and sealed documents.Per #112 Memorandum Decision and Order, certain documents have been deemed confidential by the court. Those documents are sealed and must continue to be treated as such in all filings as long as the court's order remains in place. Additional arguments have been raised, however, about whether some of those documents should continue under seal. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is to set a date for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether the documents satisfy the requirements to continue under seal.A video link will be emailed to counsel, the pro se defendant, and the court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others are instructed to email utdecf_waddoups@utd.uscourtgs.gove to obtain video link.Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah (tdp)

February 19, 2022

Filing 188 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #184 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 2/19/2022. No attached document. (tdp)

February 19, 2022

Filing 187 DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice 181 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 2/19/2022. No attached document. (tdp)

February 19, 2022

Filing 186 Motions No Longer Referred: #184 Redacted MOTION to Seal Document and Memorandum in Support (seeking limited redactions to Dkt. Nos. 181, 181-5), and 181 MOTION to Compel Deposition of Counsel and Memorandum in Support. The motions will be handled by district judge. (tdp)

February 19, 2022

Filing 185 NOTICE VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for 07/13/2022 before Judge Waddoups. The court vacated the hearing on 2/15/2022. See Notice (ECF No. 180). Although the latest #182 Scheduling Order references the hearing, this notice clarifies that the hearing remains vacated due to the pending dispositive motions. (tdp)

February 18, 2022

Filing 184 Redacted MOTION to Seal Document and Memorandum in Support (seeking limited redactions to Dkt. Nos. 181, 181-5) filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Amit Motion - Dkt.181) (redacted), #2 Exhibit B (Ex. 1 to Amit Motion - Dkt. 181-1) (unredacted), #3 Exhibit C (Ex. 2 to Amit Motion - Dkt. 181-2) (unredacted), #4 Exhibit D (Ex. 3 to Amit Motion - Dkt. 181-3) (unredacted), #5 Exhibit E (Ex. 4 to Amit Motion - Dkt. 181-4) (unredacted), #6 Exhibit F (Ex. 5 to Amit Motion - Dkt. 181-5) (redacted), #7 Exhibit G (emails), #8 Exhibit H (emails)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 17, 2022

Filing 183 REPLY to Response to Motion re #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Sealed, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3-Sealed, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(jrj) Modified on 2/18/2022-two exhibits made Sealed per call from Counsel.(jrj).

February 17, 2022

Filing 182 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 1/8/2021. Expert Discovery due by 6/9/2022. Motions due by 7/8/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 07/13/22. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/17/22. (jrj)

February 15, 2022

Filing 180 NOTICE VACATING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for 5/12/2022 before Judge Waddoups. The #145 Amended Scheduling Order changed the hearing date to 7/13/2022. The purpose of the hearing is to set a trial date. After the hearing was scheduled, the defendants filed dispositive motions. Those motions must be decided before it is known whether a trial is necessary. Accordingly, the court also VACATES the Status and Scheduling Conference set for 7/13/2022 before Judge Waddoups. (tdp)

February 15, 2022

Filing 179 ORDER WITHDRAWING REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg for a Settlement Conference. The referral is withdrawn for the reasons stated in the Docket Text Order (ECF No. 176) issued by Judge Oberg on February 14, 2022. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 2/15/2022. (tdp)

February 15, 2022

Filing 178 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #172 MOTION to Compel Deposition of Counsel and Memorandum in Support. The document was filed incorrectly. The clerk requests the filer of the original document to refile the pleading. The new pleading will receive a new document number on the docket. These need to be filed separately so they may be properly briefed pursuant to Rule DUCivR 7-1(a)(3). (jrj)

February 14, 2022

Filing 177 APPENDIX to #174 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution (Appendix of Evidence). (Reinitz, Ariel)

February 14, 2022

Filing 176 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The order referring this case for a settlement conference directed the parties to contact Magistrate Judge Oberg on or before February 3, 2022 to schedule the conference, (Doc. No. 157), but the parties did not do so. On February 7, 2022, the parties were ordered to email Judge Oberg's chambers by February 11, 2022, indicating whether they wished to proceed with the settlement conference and, if so, providing the earliest date they would be ready to proceed. The order stated: "If the parties fail to do so, Judge Oberg will request that the district judge terminate the referral." (Doc. No. 165.) Thereafter, Mr. Amit emailed Judge Oberg's chambers indicating he did not wish to proceed with the conference. No other party contacted Judge Oberg's chambers. Because no parties have indicated they wish to proceed at this point, Judge Oberg requests that the district judge terminate the settlement referral. No attached document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 2/14/2022. (med)

February 14, 2022

Filing 175 NOTICE of Documentation of Costs by Sagy Amit re #164 Order. (jrj)

February 11, 2022

Filing 174 Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (declaration), #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Exhibit A-4, #6 Exhibit A-5, #7 Exhibit A-6, #8 Exhibit A-7, #9 Exhibit A-8, #10 Exhibit A-9, #11 Exhibit A-10, #12 Exhibit A-11, #13 Exhibit A-12, #14 Exhibit A-13, #15 Exhibit B (declaration), #16 Exhibit B-1, #17 Exhibit B-2, #18 Exhibit B-3, #19 Exhibit B-4, #20 Exhibit B-5, #21 Exhibit B-6, #22 Exhibit B-7, #23 Exhibit B-8, #24 Exhibit B-9, #25 Exhibit B-10, #26 Exhibit B-11, #27 Exhibit B-12, #28 Exhibit B-13, #29 Exhibit B-14, #30 Exhibit B-15, #31 Exhibit B-16, #32 Exhibit C (declaration), #33 Exhibit C-1, #34 Exhibit C-2, #35 Exhibit C-3)(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 10, 2022

Filing 173 REPLY to Response to Motion re #172 MOTION to Compel Deposition of Counsel and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (declaration), #2 Exhibit 1-A (email), #3 Exhibit 1-B (document production))(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 10, 2022

Filing 172 Response to #170 and MOTION to Compel Deposition of Counsel and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)

February 10, 2022

Filing 171 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting Defendants' Motion #169 to Seal Document 27 of Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 02/10/2022.

February 9, 2022

Filing 170 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit B (emails re: discovery), #3 Exhibit C (emails re: discovery), #4 Exhibit D (emails re: discovery)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 9, 2022

Filing 169 MOTION to Seal Document #166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Ong, Jacob)

February 8, 2022

Filing 167 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Electronic Motion Hearing held on 12/14/2021 before Judge Dustin B. Pead. Court Reporter/Transcriber Ed Young, Telephone number (801) 328-3202. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. To redact additional information a Motion to Redact must be filed. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 3/1/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/22/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/9/2022. (alf)

February 8, 2022

Filing 166 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment JOINTLY filed by Sagy Amit (Pro Se Defendant ) and filed by Defendants Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Appendix of Evidence, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit A01, #7 Exhibit A02, #8 Exhibit A03, #9 Exhibit A04, #10 Exhibit A05, #11 Exhibit A06, #12 Exhibit A07, #13 Exhibit A08, #14 Exhibit A09, #15 Exhibit A10, #16 Exhibit A11, #17 Exhibit A12, #18 Exhibit A13, #19 Exhibit A14, #20 Exhibit A15, #21 Exhibit A16, #22 Exhibit A17, #23 Exhibit A18, #24 Exhibit A19, #25 Exhibit A20, #26 Exhibit A21, #27 Exhibit A22 - Sealed, #28 Exhibit A23, #29 Exhibit A24, #30 Exhibit A25, #31 Exhibit A26, #32 Exhibit A27, #33 Exhibit A28, #34 Exhibit A29, #35 Exhibit A30, #36 Exhibit A31, #37 Exhibit A32, #38 Exhibit A33, #39 Exhibit A34, #40 Exhibit A35, #41 Exhibit A36, #42 Exhibit A37, #43 Exhibit A38, #44 Exhibit A39, #45 Exhibit A40, #46 Exhibit A41, #47 Exhibit A42, #48 Exhibit A43, #49 Exhibit A44, #50 Exhibit A45, #51 Exhibit A46, #52 Exhibit A47, #53 Exhibit A48, #54 Exhibit A49, #55 Exhibit A50, #56 Exhibit A51, #57 Exhibit A52, #58 Exhibit A53, #59 Exhibit A54, #60 Exhibit B01, #61 Exhibit B02, #62 Exhibit B03, #63 Exhibit B04, #64 Exhibit B05, #65 Exhibit B06, #66 Exhibit B07)(Ong, Jacob) Modified to seal exhibit per counsel on 2/9/2022 (kpf).

February 7, 2022

Filing 165 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The order referring this case for a settlement conference directed the parties to contact Magistrate Judge Oberg on or before February 3, 2022 to schedule the conference. (Doc. No. 157.) Although Judge Waddoups indicated an intent to defer the conference until summary judgment and Rule 11 motions and responses are filed, the referral, including the February 3 scheduling deadline, remained in place. That deadline has passed and the parties have not contacted Magistrate Judge Oberg, nor have they responded to the January 20, 2022 email from Judge Oberg's chambers regarding scheduling. No later than February 11, 2022, the parties must email Judge Oberg's chambers at utdecf_oberg@utd.uscourts.gov indicating whether they wish to proceed with the settlement conference and, if so, providing the earliest date they will be ready to proceed. If the parties fail to do so, Judge Oberg will request that the district judge terminate the referral. No attached document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 2/7/2022. (med)

January 28, 2022

Filing 164 ORDER IMPOSING COSTS AND SETTING SCHEDULE: Plaintiffs shall reimburse Mr. Amit for all costs associated with cancellation of the scheduled depositions. Mr. Amit shall show proof of such costs on or before 2/18/22022. Plaintiff's shall cooperate full in rescheduling the depositions so they may be taken on or before 2/25/2022. The deadline for filing Plaintiff's response to Motion to Dismiss is extended to 2/11/2022. The court reinstates all deadlines set forth in the Amended Scheduling Order no. #145 . Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 01/27/2022. (kpf)

January 25, 2022

Filing 163 Minute Order. Proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Counsel, parties, court, and court reporter present by Zoom video conference. Mr. Amit requested to continue without a stay. Discussion heard. Mr. Amit also stated that he does not believe that plaintiff is attempting to settle in good faith. Court urged Mr. Amit to take into consideration to go forward with settlement conference before Judge Oberg. However, the court is not requiring any party to participate. Mr. Ong stated that he is preparing a motion for summary judgment for his clients and that settlement discussions would not be productive prior to filing the motion and responses are filed. He anticipates filing by end of this week. Mr. Amit intends to file a Rule 11 motion for sanctions for bad faith. Court lifted the stay. Order for settlement conference will remain in place, but will request that the conference be deferred until after the motions and responses are filed. Discussion heard on arranging depositions. Mr. Amit has been requesting Mr. Reintiz to produce witnesses. All requests re: depositions disputes to be handled by Judge Pead.Court adjourned.granting #158 Motion Lift Stay; Motion Hearing held on 1/25/2022 re #158 MOTION for Relief from Court order no. 157 filed by Sagy Amit Written Order to follow oral order: No. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant Jacob Ong, Sagy Amit. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson.(Time Start: 2:30, Time End: 2:45, Room Video Conference.) (asb)

January 25, 2022

Filing 162 **SEALED DOCUMENT**Sealed Exhibits re #161 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1B)(jrj)

January 24, 2022

Filing 161 Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #158 MOTION for Relief from Court order no. 157 filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (declaration) (other exhibits provided to Chambers via email))(Reinitz, Ariel)

January 22, 2022

Filing 160 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: #158 MOTION for Relief from Court order no. 157 . Motion Hearing set for 1/25/2022 at 02:30 PM in US District Court-SLC,UT *virtual Court Via Zoom Conference* before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court Reporter required - Y. Interpreter required - N. Is this an In-person Hearing - N.Parties should be prepared to address the communications that have occurred relating to a settlement conference and representations made to the court about the same.A video link will be emailed to counsel, the pro se defendant, and the court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others are instructed to email utdecf_waddoups@utd.uscourts.gov to obtain the video link. Court Address: 351 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah (tdp)

January 22, 2022

Filing 159 Motions No Longer Referred: #158 MOTION for Relief from Court order no. 157 . Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)

January 21, 2022

Filing 158 Prose MOTION for Relief from Court order no. 157 under rule 60(b)(3) filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(kpf)

January 19, 2022

Filing 157 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg under 28:636 (b)(1) for a Settlement Conference. Counsel shall, on or before 02/03/2022, jointly contact the Magistrate to schedule the Settlement Conference. The court further ORDERS that all deadlines and discovery are STAYED pending the outcome of the Settlement Conference. If settlement is not reached, new deadlines will be set. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 01/19/2022. No attached document.(tdp)

January 19, 2022

Filing 156 DOCKET TEXT ORDER GRANTING #155 Motion to Refer Case for Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 01/19/2022. No attached document. (tdp)

January 14, 2022

Filing 155 Joint MOTION for Settlement (seeking referral for court sponsored settlement conference per Dkt. 146) filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

January 13, 2022

Filing 154 REPLY to Response to Motion re #151 MOTION to Unseal Document #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Sagy Amit and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (jrj)

January 13, 2022

Filing 153 Motions No Longer Referred: #151 MOTION to Unseal Document, filed by Sagy Amit. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)

January 10, 2022

Filing 152 Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #151 MOTION to Unseal Document #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Sagy Amit and Memorandum in Support (opposition to Dkt. 151) filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

January 6, 2022

Filing 151 MOTION to Unseal Documents #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Sagy Amit and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)

January 6, 2022

Filing 150 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Pursuant to local rule DUCivR 5-3(b), Plaintiffs' Motion to Maintain Seal is GRANTED (ECF No. 149). Docket Numbers 148-1, 148-2 and 148-3 (the "Confidential Exhibits"), as attached to Defendant Sagy Amit's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 148), shall remain under seal as required by the Court's earlier Order (EF No. 112 at 12). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 01/06/2022.

January 5, 2022

Filing 149 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

January 4, 2022

Filing 148 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. (Attachments: #1 Roadmap2018_V12, #2 Summary SLC meeting 2017, #3 Competitiors)(jrj) Modified on 1/4/2022 exhibits previously filed under seal see order #112 (nl).

December 20, 2021

Filing 147 AMENDED MINUTE ORDER: As set forth on the record at the hearing held on December 14, 2021, Mr. Amit's Short Form Discovery Motion RE: Request for Production 138 is denied without prejudice[See Motion at 142, not 141]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 12/20/2021. No attached document.

December 14, 2021

Filing 146 Minute Order. Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead: Motion Hearing held on 12/14/2021 re #142 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA and #132 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA. Minute Entry & Ruling for December 14, 2021 remote oral argument. Attorney Ariel Reinitz appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs, attorney Jacob Ong appeared on behalf of Defendants RedLPR and Jeremy Barker and Defendant Sagy Amit appeared pro se. Following argument, the Court ruled as follows: 1. Based on the certification of Defendants, as stated on the record, Plaintiffs Short Form Discovery Motion RE: Request for Production 56 is moot #132 ;2. Mr. Amits Short-Form Discovery Motion RE: Request for Production 138 is denied without prejudice #142 . Before December 21, 2021, the parties are ordered to engage in a meet and confer regarding Mr. Amits discovery motion. If after the meet and confer the discovery issue remains unresolved, no later than January 14, 2022, Mr. Amit shall file his full-length discovery motion. Plaintiffs opposition to the motion is due no later than January 26, 2022, and Mr. Amits reply is due no later than February 9, 2022. See, DUCivR 7-1;3. For good cause, Plaintiffs Motion for Amended Scheduling Order is granted #142 . The Court will place the Amended Scheduling Order on the docket; and 4. Within the next thirty days, the parties shall meet and confer to determine if they are interested in referral for purposes of a court sponsored settlement conference. If the parties agree, they shall file a motion requesting that the District Court to refer the matter for settlement.Ruling set forth in detail on the record, no written ruling to follow. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Attorney for Defendant Jacob Ong for RedLPR and Jeremy Barker; Defendant Sagy Amit appearing pro se. Court Reporter: Electronic/Zoom. (tls)

December 14, 2021

Filing 145 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER granting #142 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 1/8/2021. Expert Discovery due by 6/9/2022. Motions due by 7/8/2022. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 12/14/21. (jrj)

December 13, 2021

Filing 144 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #141 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents responsive to Defendants RFP No. 138. filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (correspondence re: discovery))(Reinitz, Ariel)

December 10, 2021

Filing 143 NOTICE OF REMOTE ZOOM HEARING: Discovery Hearing set for 12/14/2021 at 1:30 p.m. on Plaintiffs' Short-Form Discovery Motion Re: Request for Production 56 #132 and Defendant Amit's Short- Form Discovery Motion Re: Request for Production 138 #141 . The hearing will be conducted remotely and instructions on appearing via Zoom will be emailed to the parties.

December 9, 2021

Filing 142 MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

December 7, 2021

Filing 141 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents responsive to Defendants RFP No. 138 filed by Defendant Sagy Amit. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(jrj)

December 3, 2021

Filing 140 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Sagy Amit. (jrj)

December 2, 2021

Filing 139 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Jacob C. Ong (not representing Sagy Amit but submitting the form for him as a courtesy) (Ong, Jacob)

December 1, 2021

Filing 138 REQUEST for Removal from Case Service List filed by Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC. (Burt, Bruce)

December 1, 2021

Filing 137 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob C. Ong on behalf of Jeremy James MC Michael Barker (Ong, Jacob)

December 1, 2021

Filing 136 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob C. Ong on behalf of Redlpr LLC (Ong, Jacob)

November 12, 2021

Filing 135 ORDER granting #133 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. Attorney Levi Y. Silver and Nathan D. Thomas withdrawn from case for Redlpr LLC, Sagy Amit, and Jeremy James McMichael Barker. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/12/2021. (jl)

November 9, 2021

Filing 134 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #132 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Silver, Levi)

November 9, 2021

Filing 133 MOTION to Withdraw filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent of REDLPR, #2 Exhibit B - Consent of Sagy Amit, #3 Exhibit C - Consent of Jeremy McMichael Barker, #4 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Thomas, Nathan) Modified by correcting event on 11/12/2021 (jl).

November 2, 2021

Filing 132 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-A (RFP 56 to RedLPR), #2 Exhibit 1-B (RFP 56 to Amit), #3 Exhibit 1-C (RFP 56 to Barker), #4 Exhibit 2-A (RedLPR objections), #5 Exhibit 2-B (Amit objections), #6 Exhibit 2-C (Barker objections), #7 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

October 8, 2021

Filing 131 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SHORT FORM DISCOVERY MOTION - denying #127 Motion to Expedite. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/8/21. (jrj)

October 5, 2021

Filing 130 RESPONSE to Motion re #127 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Silver, Levi)

September 30, 2021

Filing 129 ORDER granting Stipulated #128 Motion Setting Briefing Schedule. RED Defendants' deadline to file an Opposition to Plaintiffs' Short Form Discovery Motion #127 is October 5, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 9/30/21. (jrj)

September 30, 2021

Filing 128 Stipulated MOTION Briefing Schedule re #127 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Silver, Levi)

September 24, 2021

Filing 127 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (RFP 19 to RedLPR), #2 Exhibit 2 (RFP 18 to Amit), #3 Exhibit 3 (RFP 18 to Barker), #4 Exhibit 4 (correspondence re: proposed request), #5 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

September 10, 2021

Filing 126 NOTICE OF HEARING: Status Report and Scheduling Conference set for 5/12/2022 at 02:45 PM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. (asb)

August 9, 2021

Filing 125 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER - granting #124 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 1/8/2021. Expert Discovery due by 4/6/2022. Motions due by 5/6/2022. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 8/9/21. (jrj)

August 8, 2021

Filing 124 Stipulated MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

June 21, 2021

Filing 123 RULING & ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' SHORT FORM DISCOVERY MOTION - ORDER denying #119 Motion to Expedite. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED as MOOT as the emails that are the subject of the Motion have now been produced. Further, in light of the competing narratives and the absence of corroborative documentation memorializing the content of the parties' meet and confer communications, the Court denies Plaintiffs' request for an award of attorney fees and expenses incurred in making the Motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 6/21/21. (jrj)

June 17, 2021

Filing 122 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #119 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Silver, Levi)

June 16, 2021

Filing 121 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT RIVERLANDTECHNOLOGIES LLC - denying as moot #44 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ; granting #120 Motion to Dismiss Party. Riverland Technologies LLC terminated. The hearing scheduled for Thursday, June 24, 2021 at 9:30 AM is terminated as MOOT. HTS' claims against Riverland are hereby dismissed without prejudice, HTS and Riverland to each bear their own costs. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 6/16/21. (jrj)

June 15, 2021

Filing 120 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss Party Riverland Technologies LLC and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Dismissing Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC)(Bronson, Glenn)

June 10, 2021

Filing 119 MOTION to Expedite Short Form Discovery Motion and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (RFPs to Barker), #2 Exhibit B (Defendants' Initial Disclosures), #3 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

June 1, 2021

Filing 118 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Clark Waddoups: Scheduling Conference held on 6/1/2021.Counsel, court, and court reporter present by Zoom video conference. Discussion heard on scheduled the motion to dismiss for oral argument. #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction :( Motion Hearing set for Thursday, 6/24/2021 at 09:30 AM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Court adjourned. Attorney for Plaintiff: Ariel Reinitz, Glenn Bronson, Attorney for Defendant: Bruce Burt, Levi Silver, Nathan Thomas. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson.(Time Start: 10:30, Time End: 10:35, Room Video Conference.)(asb)

May 26, 2021

Filing 117 NOTICE OF HEARING: Scheduling Conference set for 6/1/2021 at 10:30 AM by Zoom video conference before Judge Clark Waddoups. The scheduling conference is to facilitate setting the date for an evidentiary hearing. Because the scheduling conference will be short and conducted via Zoom, the parties are to make every effort to make themselves available for it.A video link will be emailed to counsel and the court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others are instructed to email utdecf_waddoups@utd.uscourts.gov to obtain the video link. (tdp)

May 21, 2021

Filing 116 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #112 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,, Order on Sealed Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document,,,, Order on Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document,,,, Order on Motion for Discovery,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Memorandum Decision,,,, Terminate Motions,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Reinitz, Ariel)

May 12, 2021

Filing 115 AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Motion Hearing set for 6/11/2021 at 10:00 AM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Note: Hearing will be held in-person. Parties should be prepared to present evidence on the jurisdictional issue. (tdp)

May 12, 2021

Filing 114 ORDER- the court hereby grants Riverland's request for an evidentiary hearing on personal jurisdiction. The evidentiary hearing is set for June 11, 2021 at 10:00 AM. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 5/12/21. (jrj)

May 12, 2021

Filing 113 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support : Motion Hearing set for Thursday, 5/27/2021 at 02:00 PM by Zoom video conference before Judge Clark Waddoups. Video conference link emailed to counsel and court reporter by Outlook calendar invitation. All others instructed to email utdecf_waddouops@utd.uscourts.gov to obtain video link. (asb)

April 28, 2021

Filing 112 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER- denying without prejudice #49 Motion for Summary Judgment ; terminating #50 Sealed Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; terminating #57 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; granting #72 Motion for Discovery; terminating #76 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; terminating #79 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; terminating #93 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; terminating #98 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; terminating #102 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. The Clerk has unsealed the documents listed in the order as Column 3. On or before May 31, 2021 HTS shall file a document that identifies the trade secrets at issue with reasonable particularity. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/28/21. (jrj)

April 21, 2021

Filing 111 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #109 Notice (Other),, #103 Sealed Document,,, #102 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, < filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

April 21, 2021

Filing 110 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #76 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #75 Sealed Document,, , #90 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, #75 Sealed Document,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

April 21, 2021

Filing 109 NOTICE of Non-Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Maintain Portions of Defendants' Reply Brief (ECF Nos. 96, 99) Under Seal by Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC re #103 Sealed Document,,, #102 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, < (Silver, Levi)

April 16, 2021

Filing 108 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document, #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #75 Sealed Document,, #73 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Silver, Levi)

April 14, 2021

Filing 107 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #97 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, #106 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion, #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

April 13, 2021

Filing 106 REPLY to Response to Motion re #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

April 8, 2021

Filing 105 Motions No Longer Referred: #102 Plaintiffs' Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document will be addressed by the District Court Judge.

April 7, 2021

Filing 104 ORDER granting #101 Motion for Extension of Time and Plaintiffs' deadline to file its Motion pursuant to Local Rule DUCivR 5-3(b)(2) to maintain under seal portions Defendants Reply Brief (ECF Nos. 96, 99) shall be extended to April 7, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/7/21. (jrj)

April 7, 2021

Filing 103 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #102 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, <, #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2-A, #2 Exhibit 2-B, #3 Exhibit 2-C, #4 Exhibit 2-D, #5 Exhibit 2-E, #6 Exhibit 2-F, #7 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Reinitz, Ariel)

April 7, 2021

Filing 102 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #99 Sealed Document,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2-A, #2 Exhibit 2-B, #3 Exhibit 2-C, #4 Exhibit 2-D, #5 Exhibit 2-E, #6 Exhibit 2-F, #7 Exhibit Certificate of Service) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

April 7, 2021

Filing 101 MOTION for Extension of Time file DUCivR 5-3(b)(2) Motion filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

April 5, 2021

Filing 100 Motions No Longer Referred: Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document #98 . Motion will be handled by District Court Judge.

March 30, 2021

Filing 99 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, #98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLCNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Amit Declaration, #2 Exhibit F to Amit Declaration, #3 Exhibit G to Amit Declaration, #4 Affidavit Silver Declaration, #5 Certificate of Service)(Silver, Levi)

March 30, 2021

Filing 98 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #96 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion,, filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Silver, Levi)

March 30, 2021

Filing 97 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Silver Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4)(Silver, Levi)

March 30, 2021

Filing 96 Redacted REPLY to Response to Motion re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Amit Declaration, #2 Exhibit E, #3 Exhibit F, #4 Exhibit G, #5 Exhibit H, #6 Exhibit I, #7 Exhibit J, #8 Exhibit K, #9 Exhibit L, #10 Affidavit Barker Declaration, #11 Exhibit M, #12 Affidavit Silver Declaration, #13 Exhibit N, #14 Exhibit O, #15 Exhibit P, #16 Exhibit Q)(Silver, Levi)

March 27, 2021

Filing 95 Motions No Longer Referred: #93 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #92 Sealed Document. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)

March 26, 2021

Filing 94 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document , #91 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion, #78 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, #80 Sealed Document,, #58 Sealed Document,,,,,,,,,,,,,, #92 Sealed Document, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

March 24, 2021

Filing 93 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #92 Sealed Document, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Service) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 24, 2021

Filing 92 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #91 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B2 (corresponds to Dkt. 91-1), #2 Exhibit B4 (corresponds to Dkt. 91-2), #3 Exhibit B7 (corresponds to Dkt. 91-3), #4 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 23, 2021

Filing 91 Redacted REPLY to Response to Motion re #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B2 (redacted), #2 Exhibit B4 (redacted), #3 Exhibit B7 (redacted))(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 23, 2021

Filing 90 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #76 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #75 Sealed Document,, filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Silver, Levi)

March 18, 2021

Filing 89 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE - granting Stipulated #87 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #87 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support , #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support . Replies due by 3/30/2021. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 3/18/21. (jrj)

March 17, 2021

Filing 88 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support , #60 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, #77 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

March 17, 2021

Filing 87 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support , #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Silver, Levi)

March 16, 2021

Filing 86 RESPONSE to Motion re #79 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

March 15, 2021

Filing 85 Motions No Longer Referred: #76 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #75 Sealed Document, and #79 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document. Motions will be handled by district judge. (tdp)

March 12, 2021

Filing 84 Motions No Longer Referred: #72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by district judge. (tdp)

March 12, 2021

Filing 83 ORDER granting #71 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order Discovery due by 12/6/2021. Motions due by 1/6/2022. See order for additional deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 03/12/2021. (jl)

March 11, 2021

Filing 82 NOTICE of Non-Opposition to Stipulated Motion for Amended Scheduling Order by Riverland Technologies LLC re #71 Stipulated MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order (Burt, Bruce)

March 10, 2021

Filing 81 Motions No Longer Referred: Defendants Redlpr LLC, Sagy Amit and Jeremy James McMichael Barker's Motion Regarding Filing Motion for Summary Judgment And Certain Exhibits Thereto Under Seal #50 will be addressed by the District Court.

March 9, 2021

Filing 80 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #78 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLCNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Amit, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Affidavit of Service)(Silver, Levi)

March 9, 2021

Filing 79 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #78 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Silver, Levi) Modified by linking motion to redacted document on 3/10/2021 (jl).

March 9, 2021

Filing 78 Redacted MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Amit Redacted, #2 Exhibit A-Redacted, #3 Exhibit B-Redacted, #4 Exhibit C-Redacted, #5 Exhibit D-Redacted, #6 Exhibit E-Redacted, #7 Exhibit F-Redacted, #8 Exhibit G-Redacted, #9 Exhibit H-Redacted, #10 Exhibit I-Redacted, #11 Exhibit J-Redacted, #12 Exhibit K-Redacted)(Silver, Levi)

March 9, 2021

Filing 77 REPLY to Response to Motion re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC. (Burt, Bruce)

March 9, 2021

Filing 76 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #73 Redacted MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #75 Sealed Document,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Service) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel) Modified by linking motion to redacted document on 3/10/2021 (jl).

March 9, 2021

Filing 75 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #73 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-C (corresponds to Dkt. 73-4), #2 Exhibit 1-E (corresponds to Dkt. 73-6), #3 Exhibit 1-F (corresponds to Dkt. 73-7), #4 Exhibit 1-K (corresponds to Dkt. 73-12), #5 Exhibit 1-M (corresponds to Dkt. 73-14), #6 Exhibit 1-S (corresponds to Dkt. 73-20), #7 Exhibit 1-V (corresponds to Dkt. 73-23), #8 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 8, 2021

Filing 74 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Defendant Riverland Technologies, LLC to file a response or, in the alternative, a notice of non-opposition to Plaintiffs' Stipulated Motion for Amended Scheduling Order #71 no later than March 12, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 03/08/2021. (amn)

March 5, 2021

Filing 73 Redacted MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support , #50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Ex. 1 (Declaration), #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C, #5 Exhibit 1-D, #6 Exhibit 1-E, #7 Exhibit 1-F, #8 Exhibit 1-G, #9 Exhibit 1-H, #10 Exhibit 1-I, #11 Exhibit 1-J, #12 Exhibit 1-K, #13 Exhibit 1-L, #14 Exhibit 1-M, #15 Exhibit 1-N, #16 Exhibit 1-O, #17 Exhibit 1-P, #18 Exhibit 1-Q, #19 Exhibit 1-R, #20 Exhibit 1-S, #21 Exhibit 1-T, #22 Exhibit 1-U, #23 Exhibit 1-V, #24 Appendix Appendix of Evidence)(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 5, 2021

Filing 72 MOTION for Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration in Support) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 4, 2021

Filing 71 Stipulated MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

March 2, 2021

Filing 70 ORDER granting #69 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support . Replies due by 3/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 03/01/2021. (jl)

March 1, 2021

Filing 69 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Burt, Bruce)

March 1, 2021

Filing 68 ORDER granting #67 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document and #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support. Replies due by 3/9/2021. Responses due by 3/5/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 03/01/2021. (jl) Modified by correcting deadlines on 3/3/2021 (jl).

February 26, 2021

Filing 67 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support , #50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document, #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document , #58 Sealed Document,,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 16, 2021

Filing 66 ORDER granting #64 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Replies due by 3/2/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/16/21. (jwt)

February 16, 2021

Filing 65 ORDER granting #63 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, Responses due by 2/26/2021; #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document, Responses due by 3/2/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/16/21. (jwt)

February 15, 2021

Filing 64 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Burt, Bruce) Modified on 2/16/2021 correcting entry type to Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply(jwt).

February 12, 2021

Filing 63 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support , #50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document, #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document , #58 Sealed Document,,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 8, 2021

Filing 62 ORDER granting #61 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Responses due by 2/6/2021 Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/8/21. (jwt)

February 8, 2021

Filing 61 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support , #60 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 6, 2021

Filing 60 Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3)(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 2, 2021

Filing 59 Motions No Longer Referred: Plaintiffs' Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document #57 will be addressed by the District Court. (amn)

February 2, 2021

Filing 58 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document, #57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest SolutionNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-1), #2 Exhibit 2 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-2), #3 Exhibit 3 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-3), #4 Exhibit 4 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-4), #5 Exhibit 5 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-5), #6 Exhibit 6 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-6), #7 Exhibit 12 (corresponds to Dkt. 57-12), #8 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 1, 2021

Filing 57 Redacted MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

January 26, 2021

Filing 56 Motions No Longer Referred: #50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support. Motion will be handled by district judge.

January 25, 2021

Filing 55 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: Defendants REDLPR, LLC; Sagey Amit, and Jeremy James McMichael Barker have filed a sealed motion #50 that contains information marked "Confidential" by one or more Plaintiffs. Pursuant to DUCivR 5-3(b)(2)(C)(i), the court notifies Plaintiffs that on or before February 1, 2021, they must file a motion explaining why the documents they have designated "Confidential" should remain under seal. Failure to file such a motion will result in the respective documents being unsealed.The court admonishes the parties that compliance with this rule shall be required for any future filings that meet DUCivR 5-3(b)(2)(C)(i) conditions. Otherwise, the court may unseal future documents without further notice.No attached document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 1/25/2021. (tdp)

January 22, 2021

Filing 54 ORDER granting #53 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Responses due by 2/5/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 1/22/21. (jwt)

January 22, 2021

Filing 53 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

January 20, 2021

Filing 52 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC re #50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document*SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document Corrected (Silver, Levi)

January 20, 2021

Filing 51 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support Corrected (Silver, Levi)

January 15, 2021

Filing 50 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION for Leave to Filed Sealed Document re #49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support (NOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties) filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Motion Filed Under Seal, #2 Affidavit Exhibit A Amit Declaration, #3 Exhibit A2 Email, dated June 22, 2020, sent to RED, #4 Exhibit A3 Email, dated July 31, 2020, sent to RED, #5 Exhibit A5 HTS document titled "VRS for Parking Systems - Overview", #6 Exhibit A6 Compilation of specification sheets for cameras sold by HTS, #7 Exhibit A11 Compilation of specification sheets for computers sold by HTS, #8 Exhibit A12 Email from John Whiteman of HTS attaching non-confidential HTS customer presentation, #9 Exhibit A13 "Partners" webpage from HTS' public website, #10 Exhibit A14 Project bid submitted by HTS for potential LPR projection, #11 Exhibit A15 HTS price quotations, #12 Exhibit A16 HTS price list, #13 Exhibit A22 HTS' so-called "Sales Pipeline", #14 Exhibit A24 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #15 Exhibit A25 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #16 Exhibit Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #17 Exhibit A27 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #18 Exhibit A28 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #19 Exhibit A29 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #20 Exhibit A30 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #21 Exhibit A33 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #22 Affidavit Exhibit B Barker Declaration, #23 Exhibit B2 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #24 Exhibit B3 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #25 Exhibit B4 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #26 Exhibit B5 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #27 Exhibit B6 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #28 Exhibit B7 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #29 Exhibit B8 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #30 Exhibit B9 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #31 Exhibit B10 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #32 Exhibit B11 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #33 Exhibit B12 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker, #34 Affidavit Exhibit C Byerly Declaration, #35 Exhibit C3 Email string between Amit and Robert A. Byerly, #36 Affidavit Exhibit D Silver Declaration, #37 Exhibit D2 Plaintiff's initial responses and objections to the Interrogatories, Dated February 5, 2020, #38 Exhibit D3 Discovery meet-and-confer emails between counsel, #39 Exhibit D5 Plaintiff's amended responses and objections to the Interrogatories, Dated July 8, 2020 (designated "CONFIDENTIAL"), #40 Proposed Order, #41 Proof of Service) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Silver, Levi)

January 15, 2021

Filing 49 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of Evidence, #2 Affidavit Exhibit A Amit Declaration -REDACTED], #3 Exhibit A1 Webpage from Houston Airport System Website listing potential bidders, #4 Exhibit A2 Email, dated June 22, 2020, sent to RED [SEALED], #5 Exhibit A3 Email, dated July 31, 2020, sent to RED [SEALED], #6 Exhibit A4 Amit employment agreement, #7 Exhibit A5 HTS document titled "VRS for Parking Systems - Overview" [SEALED], #8 Exhibit A6 Compliation of specification sheets for cameras sold by HTS [SEALED], #9 Exhibit A7 Compilation of specification sheets for various LPR cameras, #10 Exhibit A8 LPR specification guide downloaded from website, #11 Exhibit A9 LPR specification guide downloaded from website, #12 Exhibit A10 LPR specification guide downloaded from website, #13 Exhibit A11 Compilation of specification sheets for computers sold by HTS [SEALED], #14 Exhibit A12 Email from John Whiteman of HTS attaching non-confidential HTS customer presentation [SEALED], #15 Exhibit A13 "Partners" webpage from HTS' public website [SEALED], #16 Exhibit A14 Project bid submitted by HTS for potential LPR projection [SEALED], #17 Exhibit A15 HTS price quotations [SEALED], #18 Exhibit A16 HTS price list [SEALED], #19 Exhibit A17 HTS Form 8-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), #20 Exhibit A18 Exhibitor list for Parking Industry Expo ("PIE") 2020, #21 Exhibit A19 Exhibitor list for PIE 2019, #22 Exhibit A20 Parking Magazine 2020 International Buyers Guide, #23 Exhibit A21 Official Conference Program Guide, International Parking Institute ("IPI") 2018, #24 Exhibit A22 HTS' so-called "Sales Pipeline" [SEALED], #25 Exhibit A23 HTS Form 8-K filed with the SEC, #26 Exhibit A24 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #27 Exhibit A25 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #28 Exhibit A26 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #29 Exhibit A27 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #30 Exhibit A28 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #31 Exhibit A29 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #32 Exhibit A30 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #33 Exhibit A31 Docket sheet from California Superior Court Case No. 37-2018-00044543-CU-BC-CTL, #34 Exhibit A32 Letter, dated October 18, 2019, from Ariel Reinitz, #35 Exhibit A33 Email, dated September 24, 2020, sent to Sagy Amit [SEALED], #36 Affidavit Exhibit B Barker Declaration [REDACTED], #37 Exhibit B1 Barker employment agreement, #38 Exhibit B2 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #39 Exhibit B3 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #40 Exhibit B4 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #41 Exhibit B5 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #42 Exhibit B6 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #43 Exhibit B7 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #44 Exhibit B8 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #45 Exhibit B9 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #46 Exhibit B10 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #47 Exhibit B11 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #48 Exhibit B12 Emails from/to Amit and/or Barker [SEALED], #49 Affidavit Exhibit C Byerly Declaration [REDACTED], #50 Exhibit C1 Compilation of specification sheets for various LPR cameras, #51 Exhibit C2 Non disclosure agreement, #52 Exhibit C3 Email string between Amit and Robert A. Byerly [SEALED], #53 Affidavit Exhibit D Silver Declaration [REDACTED], #54 Exhibit D1 Defendants' Interrogatories, Set One, dated December 6, 2019 ("Interrogatories"), #55 Exhibit D2 Plaintiff's initial responses and objections to the Interrogatories, Dated February 5, 2020 [SEALED], #56 Exhibit D3 Discovery meet-and-confer emails between counsel [SEALED], #57 Exhibit D4 Discovery meet-and-confer emails between counsel, #58 Exhibit D5 Plaintiff's amended responses and objections to the Interrogatories, Dated July 8, 2020 (designated "CONFIDENTIAL") [SEALED], #59 Text of Proposed Order)(Silver, Levi)

January 15, 2021

Filing 48 ORDER granting #47 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Responses due by 1/22/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 1/15/21. (jwt)

January 15, 2021

Filing 47 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

January 6, 2021

Filing 46 ORDER granting #45 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support. Responses due by 1/15/2021 Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 1/6/21. (jwt)

January 5, 2021

Filing 45 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

December 9, 2020

Filing 44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Riverland Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - MS lawsuit, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Affidavit of Robert Byerly)(Burt, Bruce)

December 9, 2020

Filing 43 NOTICE of Appearance by Bruce C. Burt on behalf of Riverland Technologies LLC (Burt, Bruce)

November 3, 2020

Filing 42 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA as to Riverland Technologies LLC served on 10/20/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons Issued as to Riverland Technologies LLC)(Reinitz, Ariel)

October 29, 2020

Filing 41 ANSWER to #39 Amended Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC.(Thomas, Nathan)

October 16, 2020

Filing 40 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Riverland Technologies LLC. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (dw)

October 15, 2020

Filing 39 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC with Jury Demand. New Defendants: Riverland Technologies LLC. filed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (NDA), #2 Exhibit B ("RedMatrix" camera), #3 Exhibit C ("RedMatrix" camera)) (Reinitz, Ariel)

October 13, 2020

Filing 38 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2021., Joinder of Parties due by 1/8/2021., Discovery due by 8/5/2021., Motions due by 9/6/2021., Scheduling/Status Conference reset for 9/15/2021 at 02:45 PM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/12/2020. (lnp)

October 13, 2020

Filing 37 ORDER granting #33 Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint. Complaint to be amended no Later than October 15, 2020. Plaintiffs are directed to place a copy of their First Amended Complaint on the court docket.ORDER granting #34 Plaintffs' unopposed Motion for Amended Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/12/2020. (lnp)

October 6, 2020

Filing 36 Plaintiff's REPLY to Response to Motion re #33 First MOTION to Amend/Correct and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Reinitz, Ariel)

September 22, 2020

Filing 35 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #33 First MOTION to Amend/Correct and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Levi Y. Silver in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Join Parties, #2 Exhibit 1 to Silver Declaration -- Riverland Complain)(Thomas, Nathan)

September 8, 2020

Filing 34 Second MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

September 8, 2020

Filing 33 First MOTION to Amend/Correct and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint (clean), #2 Exhibit Ex. A, #3 Exhibit Ex. B, #4 Exhibit Ex. C, #5 Exhibit Amended Complaint (redline)) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

May 7, 2020

Filing 32 ORDER granting #31 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 4/5/2021. Motions due by 6/2/2021. Status Conference set for 6/2/2021 at 02:45 PM in Rm 7.200 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 5/6/2020. (lnp)

May 5, 2020

Filing 31 First MOTION for Amended Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Reinitz, Ariel)

February 20, 2020

Filing 30 ORDER granting #29 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. Attorney H. Dickson Burton withdrawn from case for Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/20/2020. (las)

February 20, 2020

Filing 29 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Consent by Plaintiff, #2 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Burton, H.)

December 20, 2019

Filing 28 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn R. Bronson on behalf of HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution (Bronson, Glenn)

October 29, 2019

Filing 27 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 5/5/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 5/5/2020. Expert Discovery due by 12/5/2020. Motions due by 1/5/2021. Scheduling/Status Conference set for 1/13/2021 at 02:45 PM in Rm 8.100 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/29/19. (jmr)

October 28, 2019

Filing 26 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reinitz, Ariel)

October 24, 2019

Filing 25 ORDER granting #24 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of R. Mark Halligan for HTS Image Processing,R. Mark Halligan for HTS USA,R. Mark Halligan for Quest Solution. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/24/19. (jmr)

October 23, 2019

Filing 24 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of R. Mark Halligan , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3401733, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit B - ECF Registration Form, #3 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(Burton, H.)

October 21, 2019

Filing 23 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. The parties have not complied with #12 , #14 , related to submission of an Order to Propose Schedule. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and, on or before October 28, 2019, file an attorney planning meeting report and submit a proposed scheduling order, as outlined in the Order to Propose Schedule at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov/civil-case-scheduling. The proposed scheduling order shall be submitted directly to Magistrate Judge Pead's chambers at utdecf_pead@utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/21/2019. (docket text order, no document attached).

October 16, 2019

Filing 22 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A). Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 10/16/2019. (tdp)

August 21, 2019

Filing 21 All Consent/Reassignment Forms have now been received. After review of all forms, Case Reassigned to District Judge per request of one or more party(s). Case randomly assigned to Judge Clark Waddoups. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to the case. (nl)

August 21, 2019

Filing 20 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (nl)

August 12, 2019

Filing 19 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (nl)

August 8, 2019

Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Levi Y. Silver for Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, and Redlpr LLC. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 8/1/2019. (nl)

August 6, 2019

Filing 17 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Levi Y. Silver and Consent of Local Counsel, Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3342261, filed by Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit B - ECF Registration Form, #3 Exhibit C - Proposed Order)(Thomas, Nathan)

August 6, 2019

Filing 16 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC, Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. Form due by 8/21/2019. (nl)

August 5, 2019

Filing 15 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Sagy Amit, Jeremy James MC Michael Barker, Redlpr LLC. Attorney Nathan D. Thomas added to party Sagy Amit(pty:dft), Attorney Nathan D. Thomas added to party Jeremy James MC Michael Barker(pty:dft), Attorney Nathan D. Thomas added to party Redlpr LLC(pty:dft)(Thomas, Nathan)

August 1, 2019

Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time To Propose Schedule. The parties will have up to 14 days from the date counsel for Defendants files an appearance in this case to meet and confer regarding a Proposed Scheduling Order pursuant to this Courts Order to Propose Schedule dated 6/28/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 8/01/2019. (nl)

July 25, 2019

Filing 13 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time Order To Propose Schedule filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Reinitz, Ariel)

June 28, 2019

Filing 12 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 6/28/2019. (las)

June 26, 2019

Filing 11 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ariel Reinitz for HTS Image Processing,Ariel Reinitz for HTS USA,Ariel Reinitz for Quest Solution. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 6/26/2019. (las)

June 24, 2019

Filing 10 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA as to Sagy Amit served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019. (Burton, H.)

June 24, 2019

Filing 9 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA as to Redlpr LLC served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019. (Burton, H.)

June 24, 2019

Filing 8 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quest Solution, HTS Image Processing, HTS USA as to Jeremy James MC Michael Barker served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019. (Burton, H.)

June 24, 2019

Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Jeremy James MC Michael Barker. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh)

June 24, 2019

Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Sagy Amit. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh)

June 24, 2019

Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Redlpr LLC. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh)

June 24, 2019

Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Ariel Reinitz, for Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (nl)

June 24, 2019

Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ariel Reinitz , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3308294, filed by Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Admission, #2 Exhibit B - ECF Registration Form, #3 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(Burton, H.)

June 24, 2019

Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3308271) filed by Quest Solution, HTS USA, HTS Image Processing. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner (Burton, H.) Modified on 6/24/2019 to add HTS Image Processing as a filer (nl).

June 24, 2019

Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner. Plaintiffs HTS Image Processing, HTS USA, Quest Solution is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl)

Search for this case: Quest Solution et al v. Redlpr LLC et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: HTS Image Processing
Represented By:	H. Dickson Burton
Represented By:	James C. Watson
Represented By:	Ariel Reinitz
Represented By:	R. Mark Halligan
Represented By:	Glenn R. Bronson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: HTS USA
Represented By:	H. Dickson Burton
Represented By:	James C. Watson
Represented By:	Ariel Reinitz
Represented By:	R. Mark Halligan
Represented By:	Glenn R. Bronson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quest Solution
Represented By:	H. Dickson Burton
Represented By:	James C. Watson
Represented By:	Ariel Reinitz
Represented By:	R. Mark Halligan
Represented By:	Glenn R. Bronson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Redlpr LLC
Represented By:	Nathan D. Thomas
Represented By:	Levi Y. Silver
Represented By:	Jacob C. Ong
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jeremy James MC Michael Barker
Represented By:	Nathan D. Thomas
Represented By:	Levi Y. Silver
Represented By:	Jacob C. Ong
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sagy Amit
Represented By:	Nathan D. Thomas
Represented By:	Levi Y. Silver
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Riverland Technologies LLC
Represented By:	Bruce C. Burt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]