Atherton v. Salt Lake City et al
| Arlene R. Atherton |
| St Marks Hospital, Utah State University Police and Salt Lake City |
| 2:2019cv00451 |
| June 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Ted Stewart |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(B), Magistrate to handle case up to and including R&R on all dispositive matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 8/23/2019. (tco)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Salt Lake City, St Marks Hospital, Utah State University Police (Originally received by the court on 06/27/2019). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Arlene R. Atherton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Judge Ted Stewart (tlh) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 07/09/2019. (tlh)
|
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 6/27/2019) filed by Plaintiff Arlene R. Atherton. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
