Hawkins v. Arriola
Dallin Hawkins |
Brandii Arriola |
Prisoner Litigation Unit |
2:2019cv00583 |
August 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Jill N Parrish |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Brandii Arriola (Originally received by the court on 08/20/2019). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Dallin Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope ) Assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish (tlh) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #3 Motion for Service of Process (Prisoner). ; granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial fee: TBD. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this order to file with the Court a certified copy of his inmate trust account statements. Collection of Fees Sent: No; denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 09/16/2019. (tlh) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Service of Process (Prisoner). Summons to be served on: Brandi Arriola filed by Plaintiff Dallin Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order for Service of Process)(tlh) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Dallin Hawkins. (tlh) |
Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia Romero for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 08/20/2019) filed by Plaintiff Dallin Hawkins. (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.