Natans Trading v. Energizer Holdings et al
| Natans Trading |
| American Covers and Energizer Holdings |
| 2:2019cv00587 |
| August 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Paul M Warner |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Third District Court, Salt Lake County, case number 190902439, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3354951) filed by American Covers, Energizer Holdings. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit Returns of Service, #4 Exhibit American Covers Answer to Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit Energizer's Motion to Dismiss, #6 Exhibit Declaration of Kathryn Dugan, #7 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead (Winder, Calvin) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead. Defendants American Covers and Energizer Holdings are directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
