Smith v. Comenity Bank
| Charmane Smith |
| Comenity Bank |
| 2:2019cv00665 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dale A Kimball |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
DOCKET TEXT ORDER. Plaintiff informs the court that she does not want the U.S. Marshal to effect service on her behalf and that she intends to seek a waiver of service from the Defendant #6 . Accordingly, although the U.S. Marshal is authorized to serve Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(d) (see also, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3)), the court gives heed to Plaintiff's request and Plaintiff is required to either effect service or seek a waiver from the Defendant within the time required. See, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (d), Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h); see also, https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/sites/utd/files/AO_399.pdf. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/12/2019. (amn)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #5 Order to Show Cause filed by Charmane Smith. (kpf) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE- Plaintiff is directed to respond in writing as to whether the court has jurisdiction to hear her case. Specifically, the court ORDERS Plaintiff to provide either the domicile or the citizenship of Ms. Smith at the time her complaint was filed. In turn, the court FURTHER ORDERS Plaintiff to provide the state of incorporation and the principal place of business for Defendant Comenity Bank. Failure to show cause by November 13, 2019, will result in a recommendation of dismissal to the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/30/2019. (eat)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(B), Magistrate to handle case up to and including R&R on all dispositive matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 9/20/2019. (eat)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Comenity Bank (Originally received by the court on 09/19/2019). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Charmane Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope ) Assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball (tlh) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 09/19/2019. (tlh)
|
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 9/18/2019) filed by Plaintiff Charmane Smith. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Comenity Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Comenity Bank | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charmane Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
