Patton v. Domo Inc et al
Jarrett Patton |
Dana Evan, Mark Gorenberg, Matthew R. Cohler, Domo Inc, Joshua G. James, Fraser Bullock, Glenn Solomon, Nehal Raj and Bruce Felt |
2:2019cv00781 |
October 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Evelyn J Furse |
Dale A Kimball |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Stipulated Motion for Adjournment of Case Deadlines and Conference. All case deadlines and conferences, including those enumerated in ECF No. #6 , other than those deadlines that relate to any motion for the appointment and selection of lead Plaintiff and lead counsel, are adjourned until a lead Plaintiff and lead counsel are appointed. Within 14 days of appointment of lead Plaintiff and lead counsel, the parties should submit a proposed schedule for the Court's approval resetting the deadlines postponed by this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 12/2/2019. (eat) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION re #6 Order to Propose Schedule, Joint Stipulation for Adjournment of Case Deadlines and Conference by Fraser Bullock, Matthew R. Cohler, Domo Inc, Dana Evan, Bruce Felt, Mark Gorenberg, Joshua G. James, Nehal Raj, Glenn Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Talbot, Cory) Modified by changing event type to motion to stay on 12/2/2019 (eat). |
Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendants Fraser Bullock, Matthew R. Cohler, Domo Inc, Dana Evan, Bruce Felt, Mark Gorenberg, Joshua G. James, Nehal Raj, Glenn Solomon. (Talbot, Cory) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ignacio E. Salceda for Defendants. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utah's local rules from the court's web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 11/21/2019. (eat) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Ignacio E. Salceda , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3425272, filed by Defendants Fraser Bullock, Matthew R. Cohler, Domo Inc, Dana Evan, Bruce Felt, Mark Gorenberg, Joshua G. James, Nehal Raj, Glenn Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Application, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Talbot, Cory) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Gregory L. Watts for Defendants. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utah's local rules from the court's web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 11/21/2019. (eat) |
Filing 10 EXHIBITS filed by Fraser Bullock, Matthew R. Cohler, Domo Inc, Dana Evan, Bruce Felt, Mark Gorenberg, Joshua G. James, Nehal Raj, Glenn Solomon re #9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Gregory L. Watts , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3425224,. (Talbot, Cory) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Gregory L. Watts , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number 1088-3425224, filed by Defendants Fraser Bullock, Matthew R. Cohler, Domo Inc, Dana Evan, Bruce Felt, Mark Gorenberg, Joshua G. James, Nehal Raj, Glenn Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Application)(Talbot, Cory) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Cory A. Talbot on behalf of Fraser Bullock, Matthew R. Cohler, Domo Inc, Dana Evan, Bruce Felt, Mark Gorenberg, Joshua G. James, Nehal Raj, Glenn Solomon (Talbot, Cory) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory M. Saylin on behalf of Fraser Bullock, Matthew R. Cohler, Domo Inc, Dana Evan, Bruce Felt, Mark Gorenberg, Joshua G. James, Nehal Raj, Glenn Solomon (Saylin, Gregory) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to Defendants in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 10/21/2019. (eat) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Patrick V. Dahlstrom, for Plaintiff Jarrett Patton. (nl) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Jeremy A. Lieberman and J. Alexander Hood II, for Plaintiff Jarrett Patton. (nl) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 10/18/2019. (eat) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT (Class Action) against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3397300) filed by Jarrett Patton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Appendix Plaintiff's Certification Pursuant to Federal Securities Laws, #3 Supplement Supplement to Appendix-- Schedule A, List of Plaintiff's Purchases and Sales) Assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball (Scofield, David) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball. Plaintiff Jarrett Patton is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.