Murphy v. Duchesne County Sheriffs Department
| Anthony Charles Murphy |
| Duchesne County Sheriffs Department |
| 2:2019cv00852 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Bruce S Jenkins |
| Jill N Parrish |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MOTION for Extension of Time to pay the initial filing fee filed by Plaintiff Anthony Charles Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf)
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT TO COLLECTION OF FEES from Inmate Trust Account filed by Anthony Charles Murphy. (kpf)
|
|
Filing 9
Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 50.00 received, receipt number 4681088791 (tlh)
|
|
Filing 8
**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued as to Duchesne County Sheriffs Department. (tlh)
|
|
Filing 7
COMPLAINT against Duchesne County Sheriffs Department (Originally received by the court on 10/31/2019). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Anthony Charles Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish (tlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/8/2019: #2 Envelope ) (tlh).
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying #5 Motion for Service of Process (Prisoner). ; granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial fee: $21.55. If initial partial fee is not paid within 30 days, the case will be dismissed. Collection of Fees Sent: Yes Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 11/07/2019. (tlh)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Service of Process (Prisoner). Summons to be served on: Duchesne County Sheriffs Department filed by Plaintiff Anthony Charles Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order for Service of Process)(tlh)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Appoint Counsel and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Anthony Charles Murphy. (tlh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL Judge Bruce S. Jenkins recused. Case reassigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Bruce S. Jenkins on 11/7/2019. (jag)
|
|
Filing 2
*** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Anthony Charles Murphy received from Correctional Institution. (nl) Modified on 11/1/2019 to correct filing date (nl).
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 10/31/2019) filed by Plaintiff Anthony Charles Murphy. (nl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Murphy v. Duchesne County Sheriffs Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Charles Murphy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Duchesne County Sheriffs Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
