Priest v. Randolff et al
| Michael W. Priest |
| FNU Randolff and FNU Winters |
| Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 2:2019cv00943 |
| November 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dee Benson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Service of Process (Prisoner). Summons to be served on: defendants filed by Plaintiff Michael W. Priest. (jds) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Michael W. Priest. (jds) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against FNU Randolff, FNU Winters (Originally received by the court on 11/25/2019). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Michael W. Priest. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Envelope ) Assigned to Judge Dee Benson (tlh) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial fee: TBD. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this order to file with the Court a certified copy of his inmate trust account statements. Collection of Fees Sent: No Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 12/03/2019. (tlh)
|
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia Romero for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 11/25/2019) filed by Plaintiff Michael W. Priest. (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
